I hate to talk, read, and write. Oh, and I hate math: Different teaching resolutions
Posted by: adonis49 on: February 7, 2009
I hate to talk, read, and write. Oh, and I hate math: Different teaching resolutions…
I got this revelation.
Schools use different methods for comprehending languages and natural sciences. Kids are taught the alphabet, words, syntax, grammars, spelling and then much later, they are asked to compose essays. Why this process is not applied in learning natural sciences?
I have strong disagreement on the pedagogy of learning languages.
First, we know that children learn to talk years before they can read. Why kids are not encourage to tell verbal stories before they can read? Why kids’ stories are not recorded and then translated into the written words to encourage the kids into realizing that what they read is indeed another story telling medium?
Second, we know that kids have excellent capabilities to memorize verbally and visually whole short sentences before they understand the fundamentals. Why don’t we develop their cognitive abilities before we force upon them the traditional malignant methodology? The proven outcomes are that kids are devoid of verbal intelligence, hate to read, and would not attempt to write even after they graduate from universities.
Arithmetic and math are used as the foundations for learning natural sciences. We learn to manipulate equations; then solving examples and problems by finding the proper equation that correspond to the natural problem (actually, we are trained to memorize the appropriate equations that apply to the problem given!). Why we are not trained to compose a story that corresponds to an equation, or set of equations (model)?
If kids are asked to compose essays as the final outcome of learning languages, then why students are not trained to compose the natural phenomena from given set of equations?
Would not that be the proper meaning for comprehending the physical world or even the world connected with human behavior?
Would not the skill of modeling a system be more meaningful and straightforward after we learn to compose a world from a model or set of equations? Consequently, scientists and engineers, by researching natural phenomena and man-made systems that correspond to the mathematical models, would be challenged to learn about natural phenomena. Thus, their modeling abilities would be enhanced, more valid, and more instructive!
If mathematicians are trained to compose or view the appropriate natural phenomenon and human behavior from equations and mathematical models then the scientific communities in natural and human sciences would be far richer in quality and quantity.
Leave a Reply