Archive for June 8th, 2010
The single advantage of ancient wars
Posted by: adonis49 on: June 8, 2010
It is proven that most offspring, a century ago, were the product of incests. It is documented that Adolf Hitler was the product of incest: his father married his own daughter who was conceived by one of the father’s close relatives. Rural areas, everywhere in the world, were the hotbeds of incestuous genes inheritance. Only a few tribal clans in Africa had a tradition of marrying outside the tribe and maintained healthy generations.
It is mainly lack of communication with the outside world that generated myths and customs of promoting incest behaviors and family inbreeding. This lack of communication was made difficult by primitive transport systems (along with high risks of venturing outside town limits, and the insufficient resources to marrying outside family premises in order to conserving wealth within the larger family).
If it was not for occasional wars outside the boundries of empires then, mankind would have degenerated and disappeared long time ago. War carried in its files and ranks soldiers above average in health; the customs of taking women slaves and younger prisoners of both genders had one main consequence: improving genes for upgraded resistance to infections. The other by-products benefits for invaders were the explicit catalysts that made mankind to survive up to now.
One of the main reasons that encouraged the racist ideology of “pure race” in Germany was that Germany and the other northern States were not invaded as frequently in ancient history of wars. Actually, Germanic tribes were the invading hordes into the Roman Empire, England, and France. Germanic tribes didn’t bring back slaves since they had no empires and they wanted to settle in more temperate climates; they did procreate different breeds wherever they entered. Germany before the 19th century had the lowest longevity rate and was the least populated in Europe commensurate with areas dimensions.
If it was not for the expansion of Islam in Spain from the 8th to the 14th centuries; the Crusade campaigns in the 11th and 12th centuries, and the expansion of the Othoman Empires in the 15th and 16th centuries then, the European populations would have been in a state of degeneration.
Up to the 19th century, women had high ratio of stillbirths and children dying at early ages. The few births that survived had better immunity against the countless deadly diseases. Why this sudden exponential increase in world population? It is not because of better hygiene or higher standards of living. Two main factors account for this increasing trend to reach 8 billions by 2015: First, better medical techniques that increased the odd of giving birth (instead of 3 out of 10 surviving we are experiencing 7 out of ten, even in the third world). Second, the application of urban (modern) regulations to marriage permits that excluded co-sanguine alliances and testing for blood compatibilty. The other two secondary factors are: Immunization and qualitative transport systems that allowed communication outside town limits and mass transfer to urban centers.
What about contraceptive drugs and techniques? We need to keep in mind that rural life and customs are predominant in most countries; rural region set the trend in matters of demography. Maybe urban centers will embrace about 50% of world population within a decade but the poorest districts in cities (bidonviles, favella) are worse than rural areas in controlling and managing demography. All kinds of States restrictions and regulations to limit the trend in increased population will not make a dent: Population control is tightly connected and highly correlate with higher standard of living and work opportunities for both genders.
You may read a compatible post of mine: https://adonis49.wordpress.com/2009/08/23/the-priest-the-warrior-and-the-peasant/
Note: Wars waged after the 19th century had no advantages whatsoever.
Testosterone versus Chastity: Who is Mahatma Gandhi?
Mahatma (Great Soul) Gandhi wrote: “The one to conserve his vital fluid acquires inexhaustible power.”
Maybe Gandhi experimented on his person but we have no visible records. It is said that the Indian government, after independence and the assassination of Gandhi in 1948, destroyed or classified as top-secret Gandhi’s letters and documents.
Apparently, the controversial sex aspects of Gandhi could have destabilized India? The other advantage of this censure was to safeguard the myth of the Mahatma (Great Soul) that was worth a nation.
The Mahatma was bisexual.
At one period in his youth, he separated from his wife to cohabit with his student, a German body builder named Herman Kalinbach. They lived together for 4 years, but Herman could not join Gandhi to India in 1918 because the British did not allow Herman to leave South Africa. The two lovers maintained correspondence. Gandhi wrote about his love to Herman: “How I desired my body completely…This is slavery with revenge”
If you are a male with abundance of testosterone then what other alternative you got but to ejaculate, one way or the other?
Can plenty of testosterone be transformed into other kinds of hormones or protein or ATP that extend inexhaustible power?
If testosterone is not relieved out of the system could it be disintegrated into poisonous substances?
Would testosterone butts it heads with the thousands of other hormones and get in the way of normal functioning of the body and mind?
We certainly need badly serious experiments, very methodically designed and executed to uncover stubborn myths that would set mankind free of hundreds of by-product behaviors based on sexual falsehood.
(I am ready to volunteer to be a subject in these experiment.) These will be complex set of experiments, involving hundreds of variables to control, that do not enjoy widespread consensus with the scientific and religious communities.
For example, at a specific age, who can be considered to be healthy and fit for the experiments?
What are the criteria that define someone eligible to be manipulated in the experiments?
What symptoms that would disqualify or discard a wretched male from further testing, sessions, or repeated mating or ejaculations?
For example, how “power” in “inexhaustible power” is defined?
What kind of tasks (physical, mental, and emotional) are to be done, before and after sex activities, in order to measure, evaluate, and quantify performances?
For how long these tasks should be monitored and carried on before we can claim that the tasks represented normal human behavior on a daily or weekly basis?
What items in the safety documents for permitting experiments on mankind should be considered in case things go out of hand such as sudden heart attacks and …
Gandhi changed the meaning of Brahmacharya (ascetic vows for chastity) and the term evolved in practice as Gandhi resumed his personal experimentation.
For example, Gandhi invited his grand nieces Manu and Abha to share his bed as part of individual improvement to his sex concept. The latest definition of Brahmacharya boiled down “Brahmacharya is who has no lascivious intentions even when he sleeps with fantastic nude girls; this man is within brahmacharya as long as he is progressing toward higher states of focusing in God”
“Lascivious intentions” is another term that needs to be defined by operational variables. We need to conduct further experiments to quantifying the levels of lascivious intentions and evaluate the trend toward the qualitative focused state on God.
Intention, lascivious or not, is another bogus term that we use as scapegoat to our weaknesses and laziness to act in order to improve our behaviors.
Quick, I demand that India releases all documents related to what Gandhi meant by “inexhaustible power” and “lascivious intentions.”
I am interested in acquiring power and want to know how I can tame these turbulent testosterone into states of sleep.
Yes, the older the more chaste we become, with exceptions: sleazy old males addicted to Viagra kinds have atrophied brains and are stuck senile on a single amusing game.
In general, the more chaste the less trouble you get into, with exceptions: Your wife or girl friend might become hateful and take chastity very personal.
The remedy is never to mention “chastity” within a 100-yard radius of your wife’s ear shot. And yes, get to business; that is excellent politics.
I can hear loud voices saying: “This post is blatant sex discrimination.”
I like to remind readers that the article is mainly about testosterone. It is not about chastity: I am no preacher and I don’t know Sanskrit.
Recurring news are demonstrating that prolonged chastity (vowed, forced, or forced vowed) results in child molesting tendencies.
You may read Gandhi’s biography in my previous post: https://adonis49.wordpress.com/2008/10/24/gandhis-non-violent-resistance-guidelines-february-21-2008/
Note: Gandhi had 4 kids from his wife Kasturba; he was 13 and she 14 when they got married in 1883. After Kasturba death, Gandhi grew wings; they grew proportionally to his zest for experimenting with sex and chastity.
My opinions on Gandhi’s sex life (or my opinions, period) cannot touch the greatness of Gandhi’s achievements (non-violence practices, India Independence, and his constant strife to eliminate the caste of the “untouchable“) and his battles for self-improvement and taming behaviors he considered unworthy of the greatness of mankind.
Adonis Diaries 