Adonis Diaries

Archive for July 11th, 2010

Smell of your money

I explained in a previous post “Color of your money” (https://adonis49.wordpress.com/2009/12/27/color-of-your-money/) that liquidity (currencies and banknotes) is no longer neutral and that it has lost its mythical concept of a “lubricating” medium to facilitate the exchange of merchandise   This post is investigating the other attributes of money on family, close relative relationships, and how it might have contributed in changing value systems.

Money has acquired an “intrinsic” value,  independent of the barter value concept or image that most economists are still  trying to perpetuate for over a century.

The rationale was that, since money is mainly an oiling mechanism to encourage and expand commerce then, money should be dissociated from the economic factors of national worth.

The fact is that the lubricating notion of money was tampered with since after US independence when Britain regained its monopoly over issuing US money supply, which shrank the expanding internal trades.  For example,  when the authority refrains from accommodating economic expansion by infusing more money in the market then, money is overvalued:  Particular merchandises gets practically more expensive, internal market shrinks, export is slowed down, and commerce suffers because of lack of liquidity.

When a person is in need of liquid money then he is at disadvantage when bargaining for the right price of goods that he is trying to sell as liquid money is overvalued.

The dollar is still powerful ,though it is not worth a dime if accounted on factors such as national debt, gold reserves, or even manufactured goods.  The liquidity of the dollar, being accepted as a global currency for global exchange, is its fundamental power.   The dollar is steadily being challenged to be replaced by a basket of valuable reserves indexes.

This article “Smell of your money” examines the effects of money in the affective sphere among family members and close relatives.

Sociologists started with the hypothesis that money will enhance rational “cold” interactions among family members and thus, money will eventually tarnish the traditional family value standards.  Currently, sociologists came to the realization that it was changes in the value systems that affected monetary exchanges among family members.

For example, working wives decide on either a proportional (equity) division of incoming salaries or stubbornly insist on equal shares in the household expenses, even though women might be earning less than men.

Why this irrational decision for equal shares?

In this struggle for acquiring autonomy and equality between genders in society, a wife might react as if “equitability” is promoting the perception of older generation values of “man economic dominance and power in the household”.

Money has different smell and is not neutral relative to its sources.

For example, single mothers smell money differently with respect to the sources:  money received from State welfare systems is accounted differently than money acquired by other means and spent differently on personal wants.  Thus, money is spent and viewed differently.

Money gained from prostitution is lavishly spent on luxury items.  At first, we might attribute this lavish behavior as “re-investing” in the business: to catch high scale clients you have got to look it!  Then, the luxury trend makes room to a different smell of money: luxury generates luxurious behaviors that are not easily broken.  Money from prostitution is set aside for personal class statue appearances  (class standing) and reactions to society’s perception for this oldest of businesses.

Another example is related to divorce cases. Adultery is always and originally an affective hurt that might lead to divorce.  Adultery behavior is mainly mentioned and it then takes the forefront in monetary negotiation in a divorce deal when one party does not feel that the division is fair. The issue is “how much was spent to entertaining the lover?

Adultery thus becomes an important economic factor for dilapidation of family “confidence” and traditional value systems.  Adultery remuneration in divorce cases is comparable to winning the lotto: we feel free to spending lavishly this extra windfall that was not earned from our sweat.

Another example of smell of money is the gifts to family members.

Gifts are transformed from gifts in kinds into liquid money, though verbal “contracts” are usually attached on how money should be spent.  In the 1920’s, US social assistance to the poorer classes attached clauses on how money aid should be spent.  Consequently, social workers acquired vast supervisory leverage to controlling the recipients of money aid. Maybe one day, verbal contracts will be accepted by courts as information and communication technologies become standard tools in most family applications.

Change in value systems is the major factor that easily explains social transformations, but there are needs to considering the consequences of intermediate direct factors.

The intermediate factor is, for example, the expansion and development of economic base that generates various wants and needs.

The immediate factor is the transformation, due to economic expansion, to the creation of various forms of liquidity in money such as checks, credit cards, and technical facilities to withdrawing cash money.

Forms of liquid money are not neutral: they qualitatively contribute to value transformations within family relations.

There is this guy working at the Bronx zoo, Pat Thompson, who had this idea of experimenting in 2003 with 24 human-made fragrances on the large feline carnivores.  Many ladies contributed these $60 a bottle cologne and perfumes so that Pat could resume his research.  Most scents didn’t occupy the felines more than two seconds.Two scents “obsession for men” of Calvin Klein and  “Air du temps” of Nina Ricci occupied the leopards for over 10 minutes, longer that these carnivores invest on eating their meals.

There are a few applications for these discoveries.  Wildlife Conservation Societies in tropical forests wanted to taking clear pictures of these invisible felines in order to tag every jaguar, tiger, lion. or leopard and, eventually, study their behavior.  The cameras located in various areas in the vast forests generated lousy and non exploitable pictures 40% of the time, given that these carnivores barely showed up at camera locations. The trick is spaying “Obssession” on fragment of cloths around a sprayed tree trunk and wait for the felines to smell the fragrance a mile away; then, as the feline is curiously occupied with the scent for 10 minutes, the cameras are taking excellent pictures.

So far all is well.  What bother me and worry me is that the feline got into a frolicking mood!  What if with persistent scenting may affect these felines and they start behaving like mankind?  Like copulating all year round, every time the recollection of “Obssession” incite them into mating?  Sort of scent guiding feline into substituting eyesight for female presence? Not that mankind cares about intercourse anymore since they have no energies for these redundant activities.  But, felines energy is too abundant because they are still living the wildlife style.

These combinations of vanilla and artificially produced musk could be potent medicines overtaking Viagra and their kinds.  Just emulate feline behavior and you are set for everlasting happiness and abundant sources of energies that will make you forget scanning cable channels.

In an indirectly related topic, there is this Vietnamese lady who can confirm if a man is still virgin:  She saved many convicts for rape by examining behind their ears for tiny red dots that disappear after the first intercourse!  It seems that masturbation and same-sex intercourse do not count, and won’t make these red dots vanish.  Thus, rape victims can ask for Pham Thi Hong assistance if they are not sure in identifying the attackers. At least, the virgin men can be left free in cases of suspicions not based on solidly evidence.  Mind you, you may try to rape, but if you ejaculate prematurely in your pants or somewhere else then, raping attempt might stick but it won’t erase the spots, the red ones behind your ears.  My hypothesis is that there is a particular secretion in the vagina (not the clitoris) that has this powerful medicinal effect on red spots, behind ears or another locations on the body.  I am just aiding Pham to setting up her scientific experiment once for all.


adonis49

adonis49

adonis49

July 2010
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Blog Stats

  • 1,441,098 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.adonisbouh@gmail.com

Join 784 other followers

%d bloggers like this: