Archive for October 8th, 2010
Timeline of war hardware inventions and applications (October, 2010)
Dynamite (1867); Explosion motor engine (1870); iron battleship (1880); machine gun (1884); wireless transmission (1905); grenade and vehicle land mines (1914); fighter airplane and fire launchers (1915); tanks (1916); bombers (1917); drone (1930); radar (1935); anti-personal mines (1939); missile (1942); atomic bomb (1943); reactor planes (1944); bomb A (1945); supersonic jets (1950); helicopter (1950); H-bomb (1952); nuclear reactor submarines (1954); laser (1958); satellite ((1959); nuclear airplane carrier (1964); Strategic Defense Initiative (1983); precision guided missile (1990); stealth bomber (2000); robot killer (2005).
You realize that sophisticated war hardware invention accelerated its pace during WWI. Your worries heighten when you discover that after WWII, the time line from invention to application shortened drastically. It is as powerful States are very anxious to show off the potentials of mass destruction by creating arm conflicts for effective testing of the new arsenals. Actually, we witnessed 115 armed conflicts after 1945, twice the total number of conflicts in 150 years. The US, France, England, and Russia annihilated entire islands and destroyed the ecosystem of vast lands just for testing H-bombs. The effects of underground atomic testings are surfacing now with increased volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and tidal waves.
After testing on live hapless developing nations then, barons of military industries and Defense Department start exporting arms to so-called “friendly States”. Most of these “friendly States” produce oil and don’t know how to use what they purchased; the military budgets of many States lack allocation to maintaining the sophisticated machines of death; thus, paying for military experts of the superpower State to keeping the hardware combat ready.
The US government exports 50% of the total war hardware sold around the world; ten other States export the remaining 50%. The US military budget is higher than the military budgets of all the UN recognized States. Mind you that a single B2 bomber cost the military budget of 120 States; what this bomber is used for? Mainly if an armed conflict starts with China!
The UN banned the usage of many arms of mass destruction and especially chemical weapons that Germany started in 1916, Japan used in China in 1943, then US used in China in 1950, in Vietnam for many years (orange gas), and also in Iraq in 2003. Israel is still using all the banned arms on the Palestinians and the Lebanese such as cluster bombs, phosphorous bombs, Dense Inert Metal Explosive ammunitions… Tony Blair of England should be facing international court for crimes against humanity but he was recompensed with a peaceful resolution of Palestinian Israeli conflicts: He delivered the cluster bombs to Israel in the 2006 war against Lebanon. Lebanon barely cleaned up half the clustered bomb in 5 years and more casualties are witnessed every week: In Lebanon, hundred have died and thousand permanently injured.
This century witnessed 140 armed conflicts totaling more than 150 millions in direct casualties. Three times that number suffered permanent disabilities and handicaps physically, mentally, or both. Thus, one billion of mankind were wasted just in wars. More than twenty conflict produced over one million killed. WWI generated about 9 million killed and WWII more than 60 millions. Two dozen conflicts are still on going for decades and the toll is accumulating. Mind that in every decade, one billion die of famine and curable diseases. The UN estimated that currently there is one billion earning less than a dollar per day and have no shelters: Which means, all the most downtrodden of the billion of mankind will invariably die within the decade of famine and curable diseases.
Woodstock and May 68 (France): Any links?
Posted by: adonis49 on: October 8, 2010
Woodstock turned out to be the free musical event of the century and gathered a million of youth and young parents with their kids for three days: It was organized in a nation of plenty and economic growth. The US was training astronauts to land on the moon and the war in Vietnam was harvesting 200 US soldiers every day. The youth in France, and particularly in Paris, took to the streets and occupied schools, universities, manufactures for a whole week. France was in a State of plenty; and “Law and Order” was firmly established. It is that transparency of the power system in both countries was lacking.
Youth and the newer generations were worried of carrying on their life as their parents did: It seemed pretty boring and pointless to working for just acquiring consumers goods. Youth needed an alternative for their future and a way out of what to do of these internal conditions of plenty and security. In both events, youth motto was: “Love is everything. We need to be free to love and be loved. Yes for peace and no for war” In a sense, to youth, morality and law and order were no longer necessary. They want to be liberated of the shackles of the moral “value set” that society was chaining them in; that’s how they perceived the political and social situation then, and their feeling was on target: Change and reforms were not being felt as technology was.
Men, lawyers and investors, organized Woodstock; but it was the women who ran the show and kept the peace; marijuana and a few other drugs helped. It was not supposed to rain in that summer event but it poured; people enjoyed sliding in the muddy inclines. Many soldiers returning from the front in bad mental and physical conditions joined the party: They were in states of shock and diminished as individuals. The mood at war was different from the mood of fraternity, compassion, respect for the other during the musical event: They experienced extremes in mood swings.
People who purchased tickets, before the event turned free, could gather in front of the large stage. Most attending visitors parked on the hills surrounding the show: They saw little ants singing and bouncing on the stage but they had their own music in the caravans and vans and tents. They had their own supply of drugs and favorite music. They could feel at peace alone even among million. Masses were no longer of any threat; they could deal with their own internal demons in a gathering of like-minded association.
I lack statistics on the casualties during Woodstock such as injuries, sicknesses…but it is amazing that the event went on for three days in relative peace and very few official policing. Most of the youth had no plans of action for their future; they had not the slightest idea where the next location will be or how their life will unfold. Many converged to San Francisco, particularly to Ashbury Heights. The young women had a better grasp of how their individual social stand could transform and empower family and community. Transparency of the democratic system and reforms were very much in the mind of the newer generation but the detailed programs and future activities were not planned. It was the real step forward in mankind history instead of the so-called “giant step” of Armstrong on the moon.
In the revolt of May 68, women were the most vocal and most active in the organization and demonstrations: They were revolting for serious freedom to womanhood in the customs and traditions of society. Laws were to be more specific on gender equality in duties, rights, and responsibilities and opportunities in the work place and be effectively applied.
At that age of seemingly confused plan of actions, many claimed that joining for music sake and this impulse of being there in the gathering of crowds was a show of unity of youth spirit around the world. Youth refuses to missing a togetherness event. It is this power of gathering that worried the power-to-be: The various interpretations of the meaning of these demonstrations were beside the point.
It was a big party with deep lucidity: banners read “Run, comrade, run. The old world is chasing after you.” Youth was taking a reprieve by running joyously, a week of total freedom, running as fast as he could, knowing that the old world will invariably catch up with him. Karl Marx said: “When history repeats its cycles, the next time around is a farce.” Spring of 68 was a sympathetic and spontaneous farce; it was an innovating and creative revolt with no arms.
It was a spring of movable fair, an all free-invited party. It was a movable feast for sharing ideas and desires for justice, peace, liberty, and pleasure. There were plenty of generosity and compassion: Youth was feeling bored of the old world system of unjust order, capitalism, petrified ideologies and dogmas. It was a humongous fair where affluent lifestyle in the western States of plenty hide the miseries of the lowest classes living in shantytowns; it was in a period for the third world struggling to emerge from the slavery stage of colonialism. Spring fairs in the western world spread to most nations where the partying lasted and lasted.
The virus of the movable feast reached countries with old systems destroyed by the colonial powers: The newer power systems were unstable and mostly haphazard to come chasing after mass movable fairs. Spring of 68 crossed to Lebanon and lasted 5 years and emerged on a civil war that lasted 13 years and produced 300 thousand casualties (10% of the population!)
You don’ t need to have a unified purpose to getting together; just youth assembling. Large assembling of wolves is good enough a show of force to giving the best impulse to political parties for figuring out the major problems in the political structure ideology. The awareness of the problems, after the show of “peaceful force”, can make a difference even if the demonstration was not united behind a clear banner of intent for specific reforms. Invariably, a few reforms are imposed. Getting on the streets beats sitting in isolation, eating our hearts out in bitterness and confusion.
The next phase of modernity began after this successful big party. Moral values were reviewed and adapted to new realities because ancient fears changed qualitatively: Laws of pure obedience were submitted to a new reflecting generation. Ethics of giving more weight to values than laws was supposed to be the normal extension to morality. The foundations were erected for the remaining of this most violent century.