When to have great sex? Or How to have great sex?
Posted by: adonis49 on: October 15, 2011
- In: Essays | humor | lucubration Today | Safety | sex/ love/seduction | social articles | women
- 4 Comments
When to have great sex? Or How to have great sex?
I have posted many articles on sex and seduction: You might check the category “sex, seduction, love”. I stumbled on a link that is more of the inspirational kind than describing reality. You judge.
notesby.me posted this, titled “When to have great sex”
It goes: “In the animal world males respect females. At least when it comes to sex. Males wait until the female is in heat. She then gives them the signal. They approach. She picks one (or more of the males) And they have great sex (Would skip the great). All the other days of the year, males respect and wait.
Most human males aren’t as courteous. Some are. Males want sex all the time (not sure. Probably many females do).
Sure animal males want sex all the time too (not sure of that proposition, even male cats are not constantly engaged in that exercise) .
Yet, they don’t pressure the females. And believe it or not, although human females can have sex anytime, they too go into, and I’m carefully using the word, ‘heat’ for a few days a month.
Human females concede to the male a lot of times. Because they love the guy. Because they pity him. Because they’re afraid of the consequences. Because they don’t mind. Sure they’ll both have sex. It might feel like rape. It might suck. It might be ok. It might be good. But it won’t be great.
Male? Want great sex? Show some respect. Wait until she gives the signal. She’ll love you for it.
Female? Point your partner to this note. Twitter: @williamchoukeir” End of quote
My comments:
First, our close relatives the monkey-kinds do sex all the time, and many times per day, with many females in the tribes. Many insects behave the same. Rats too…Is it because the females want sex more often than males?
It is not a matter of respect of the male mammals for the “second sex” that the males are perceived by men in animal documentaries. Males have comprehended that it is useless to force females into copulating…It is hard work chasing after, and receiving bad injuries by forcing the matter. Large male animals have got to wait, be there all the time, showing urgency, and readiness to satisfy the partner as females are in heat…
Male animals are less agile than females, and they just like to strut and fake combativeness with competitive males…They have trees and other gentler males to do the thing…
Second, animals have not lost their powerful smell indicator: Mankind sense of smell has been deteriorating and they have to rely on their eyes and hearing to get it…Sex for male mankind is more in the brain than in the sensory urgency.
It is not when to have sex, but rather how to have great sex! Great sex in mankind is hard work, time consuming, plenty of foreplay, extremely expensive…And the male genders always pay the price for not understanding that “doing sex” is accepting slavery conditions…
Let us not romanticize the physical sex engagement…It is awfully exorbitant, if you are not mentally ready to pay the price.
Actually, having less than great sex is far more profitable in the long-range: Males can sample the females until he settles down on the one he wants to be her slave…her shadow, kissing the ground where she steps, her dog, her purse…
You want to institute a family with kids? Do it early on as your testosterone level is in the explosive range…
Marriage should be a contract with specific climaxing date, to be renewed if both couple agree for extending the family life…
Note 1: https://adonis49.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/king-cobra-may-kill-female-if-rebuffed/
Note 2: You may read this sample post https://adonis49.wordpress.com/2009/11/17/sex-for-a-sufi/
Adonis Diaries 
October 19, 2011 at 5:07 am
I’d like to assume that you’ve got reason, that you are the gender I think you are based off of your generalizations, however, I would just like to ask you some questions before I make a statement:
What gender are you?
Did you write this essay yourself? (because I’m confused as to its source that you mention among the other links in the piece)
Have you read On the Origin of Species in any amount?
October 19, 2011 at 10:20 am
Tell me what Origine of Spieces may shed in intelligence as to my gender, and I promise to tell you mine…
October 20, 2011 at 3:15 am
The Origin seems to confound the nature of man by generalizing man and beast in order to readily compare the traits of the two groups; and science and gender studies have since become much more political, which is why your perpetuation of these generalities, although recognized as such, is disturbing. The man described in the essay above does not fit my identity in any way, (“Males want sex all the time”)
Parading as an erudite opinion seems fraudulent because there is a lack of scientific basis, with phrases like that women go into heat too; this, despite having writ “I’m carefully using the word”.
I don’t want be cast as a reader who is “reading too deeply” into an article, or worse, have my comment removed, so I’ll conclude my response by saying that the philosophical component is weakly supported because of this essaywriter’s lack of resources; claiming opinion as scientifically based is ridiculous, and I may avoid commenting on such lousy articles in the commercial press that we both know are published daily, but blogging is meant to be the epitome of the good qualities of freelance journalism. However, this article has disappointed me as a person who is curious about the polymath studies of sex. There are some books you could read and it would make the writing significantly better with comparatively little work.
I liked the “second sex” bit, it would be pleasant if you got the Simone de Beauvoir / Jacques Lacan side of the story, too. The writing of this essay shows that the writer has an interest, however, that the interest has not been invested with any even shallow research. That, and this is the first of one of your articles I find worthy of replying to; adonis49 fills up my inbox with mostly unread messages, so the sex spin seems to have been a pot-boiler title, in reflection…
October 20, 2011 at 9:33 am
Appreciate this developed reply. I decided to reply by an entire article in the coming couple of days. You may re-read the article in the meantime and differenciate the part that I wrote…Thank you Jay.