Adonis Diaries

Archive for October 14th, 2012

  •  Pingack, hyperlink, Unported License, etiquette…”You should know…”:
  • Getting there, leisurely, gradually
  • It was not the first time that I was asked by an “author” to post a link to the original article that I used, even though it was unchanged and the name was tagged. Actually, this was my third encounter with aliens.
  • It had to dawn on me that the exercise of crowding articles with all kinds of links is to have the name or the blog of the “concerned person” disseminated.  On the sound assumption that readers have all the time in the world and this effervescent zeal to leaf through every link thrown at them, for the pleasure of satisfying the ego of zillion of bloggers, just copying and pasting from one another: “The more you copy the more creative you become...
  • “One of those encounters was led by a “friend” of the author who didn’t mind at all. However, the friend, who turned out not to be able to write, snatched the dropped flag and wanted to run with it…
  • Another encounter was not alien, but in the flesh and blood, a close cousin.I published one of his posts, corrected a few typos and tagged his name…He was not pleased and recited such a long paragraph on a registered lisence…. I was dumbfounded of his memory, particularly that the paragraph made no sense to me and had long string of numbers…Something like ” I do publish under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License…”This sentence I received as a response to a note of minein one of my posts that say:“Fortunately, I don’t blog full-time or navigate the net to find out who have borrowed my ideas from the 3,100 articles that I posted: That would be a nightmare to keep track of and of no benefit, as far as I know. All that I am interested in is disseminate what is controversial and need to be discussed and reflected upon…”

    In any case, my cousin is on vacation, and I’ll run this lisence stuff on him and check if it matcheshis  words to words, including the numbers…

    An example of how unprofessional and technologically deficientI am  is this reply that I got:

    For one, I’d like to let you know how I discovered that you had re-blogged my article. It wasn’t a case of having to “navigate the net to find out who have borrowed my ideas”, but simply a matter of receiving a pingback from your post. It’s something that you should know about in your blogging – along with how to put hyperlinks into  your posts…”

    Two ideas in this reply I still cannot figure out:

    1. Pingback: The only pingbacks that I receive are the ones that wordoress returns for links of mines in my own posts, referring to other posts of mine. I cannot understand why wordpress has to clutter my pages on stuff I personnally activated..ping ponging the ball back to me, and eventually blackening one of my eyes.

    As for the pingbank that the reader received following my post, I’ll have to ask him on his personal email…Suppose that the reader is a subscriber to my blog, does he automatically receive the pingbacks that were meant for me?

    2. This hyperlink stuff was a theoretical matter for me more than a decade ago.  I was under the impression that a regular link (this longstring of gibberish) is indeed what is referred to as hyperlink…I now suspect that hyperlinks are these Blue words that stud published pieces on the net.  Now, how to translate long sentence links into Blue short words is going to be my first priority to learn “how to do it“. Blue hyperlinks are neat, professional and appealing to the eyes, particularly in long articles: You can click on the Blue word and sidetrack the boring article for a change…

    Actually, I learned how to add links 6 months ago.  A niece of mine asked me to send her a link of my post…and after several minutes of patient explanation, I saw this stuff on the top of the page that I should highlight, copy and paste.  Simple, nothing to it. It is Google that is not returning properly what I ask him to search for, in order to add links…Would adding hyperlinks be as easy?

    Note 1: Do I have to remind my readers that I own no computer, no laptop, not even a cellular phone? Two decades ago I used pagers until I went crazy, and also used cell phones until I went broke, not generating a nickle for all the useless calls that I received…iPhones (Apple and Samsung…) may produce generations of new products and facilities, I won’t acquire one unless my business require one of these fancy trademarks…I’ll get myself a Samsung: cheaper and more performing…

    Note 2: Have you noticed the dots at the beginning of the post? I have no idea how the first dot appeared, and I failed to erased it: It just come back, a steady fixture, which I had to work around i and go on as invisible dots.

    Note 3:

    1.You may find it helpful to look at the WordPress support pages here: http://learn.wordpress.com/

     2. adding hyperlinks is covered here: http://en.support.wordpress.com/links/

     3. pingbacks here: http://en.support.wordpress.com/comments/pingbacks/

     4. prefer a video, there’s one on hyperlinks here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIJmW-jC8t0

     5. and one on pingbacks here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHA2gLO8Sk

    Note 4. There’s nothing complicated about Creative Commons licences. They are just a way of telling readers that your blog posts are not copyrighted, and they are welcome to reproduce them under certain conditions (e.g. that they acknowledge the author). Anyone can use them. Have a look here: http://creativecommons.org/

How university Board of Directors oversee university Administrations?

It is very refreshing that many of my acquaintances have opened blogs. Running a blog acquires a life of its own:

First, you need to post a first “piece of your mind”, followed by a few other pieces, on the ground of circumventing traditional media who want to control your opinions…

Second, you start publishing excerpts of your diary, beginning with the inconsequential secrets and a few little psychological aches

Third, if you have written short stories, this is the time to get them out to the public…

Fourth, sureptitiously venting out a few deeper psychological pains find their way out…

Fifth, you post chapters of a novel…

Six, in developed countries, you have the opportunity to publish your novel or collections of your essays and “pieces of mind” that you have posted, and you are officially recognized an “author”

The big jump comes when you realized that many of others’ pieces of mind are worth disseminating and commenting upon…You are connecting and feeling that sharing is not a one-way endeavor, and you post other people’s blog pieces…Now you are a professional blogger…

A cousin of mine visited Lebanon lately, and I asked me to send me a link of one of his posts. He replied: “Search Googles”  Great idea! I barely search Google because I don’t surf the net, not yet.

Yesterday, I DECIDED to have a peek.

Professor Nassif Ghoussoub posted on Nov. 18, 2010 under “Do you want to be a governor?

“I am completing a 3-year term as a faculty representative on UBC’s Board of Governors. Here are a few selected personal notes from my experience on that Board. My 33 years of academic service at UBC were surely helpful in dealing with the steep learning slope, but nothing could have prepared me for the challenges of this experience.

First, the good news: I found the appointed governors, and most of the students representatives, to be bright and engaged. The President is truly exceptional, both in his personal approach to the job, and for his core values, academic priorities, and intellect. The Administration consists of hard working and reasonable people who are committed to the well-being of the university. But every Administration has its own set of values, skills, convictions, and methods, hence the need for independent oversight. This is in principle the role of the Board.

In practice, however, this oversight is not as obvious as it sounds, since essentially all the information that forms the basis of Board decisions is provided by the Administration. Compatibility and trust become the main currencies in this relationship. That’s why we often see two contrasting types of Boards: the hostile ones (a dozen Canadian university presidents were sacked by their Boards in the last couple of years), or the completely docile ones.

How does our Boards look lately? Well, the current assumption is that everything the Administration presents to the Board will, in fact, be approved, and that any serious probing by a governor of any submission is seen as an outlier. I often saw myself walking a very tight rope trying to support the Administration without conceding a “carte blanche”, to trust its competence without relinquishing oversight, to suggest ideas without micromanaging, and to question it without doubting it.

Back to good news: After an initial period of adjustment to my own -somewhat direct – style, I sensed a less defensive and more receptive Administration. The preservation of academic freedoms, privacy, and the formal implementation of ethical practices in the management of the UBC endowment were easy commitments to defend, considering that the current President himself is a champion of human rights, and international law.  With other keen governors, I advocated for, and contributed to, a more pro-active role for the Board through a series of working sessions in which Governors could provide substantial input towards long-term strategic planning. I have witnessed a serious evolution towards more accountability and transparency.

What were the main challenges? The approval process for capital projects funding has to be one of the most prominent.  It is the case that most projects come with various levels of funding from external sources (private, federal or provincial). But the funds are never sufficient, and decisions need to be made quickly, sometimes in a hastily arranged conference call, and often on the basis of optimistic assumptions and rosy scenarios. The decision process is incremental (Board 1 to 4) but it is a fact that once you have embarked on a project, it is difficult to turn back, even when financial commitments do not materialize, which happens more often than not.

The missing funds eventually have to come from the university’s general operating funds (GPOF), either directly or via the borrowing costs on external loans. Whether the university’s GPOF should be used as such is a subject of a continuing debate (and not just at UBC). The question of how far a particular Administration can borrow, commit, even mortgage the future of the university has no simple answer.

Recent developments have, however, taken these responsibilities and challenges to a whole new level. The passage of Bill 20 and its implications for the university’s land use practices, and the re-evaluation of UBC’s current status as a “Government Reporting Entity” (GRE) represent major milestones in our university’s history. I do support a plan to develop further the University’s community, and I have participated in the formulation of the basic principles on which the process is now based. But the devil is in the details, most of which I do not yet know. This Land Use Plan (LUP) is significant in scope, and is irreversible.

I am advocating for specific policies that will help keep it aligned with the academic mission long after this substantially expanded UBC town develops its own demographic identity.

Final thoughts: The Board needs to be more sensitized to the value and the contributions of faculty members to UBC the institution. On the books, our salaries appear as a major liability on the operating budget, but the faculty are what make and break the university’s reputation.

Faculties bring research funding, which is becoming a substantial portion of the University’s budget, and they are the most permanent of the university’s stakeholders. The presence of strong, credible, and knowledgeable faculty representatives on the BoG is extremely important.

The review of UBC’ status as a GRE opens the possibility for restructuring the BoG. I am therefore advocating for a larger number of faculty representatives on the Board, coupled with a staggering of their period of service.

This restructuring would ensure a more adequate representation, and will guarantee continuity, both in terms of experience and historical perspective. We also need faculty representation on the IMANT Board (the one that manages the endowment, and the faculty pension plan) and more importantly, on UBC Property Trust (which manages the development of UBC land).

Finally, I cannot stress enough the need to have faculty representatives on the BoG that are independent thinkers, and have the courage to speak up when they diverge from the Administration line.  This is good for the Board, good for the University and good for the Administration.” End of post

nghoussoub.com

Note: Part of Professor Ghoussoub CV dated 2005 read as follows:

Born in Western Africa (currently rep. of Mali), Nassif Ghoussoub obtained a License en Mathématiques at the Lebanese University of Beirut in 1973, a Doctorat 3ième cycle in 1975 and later a Doctorat d’état in 1979 from the Université Pierre et Marie Curie in Paris, France. He held a postdoctoral position at the Ohio State University in 1976-1977.

He has been at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, since 1978 and is currently a Professor of Mathematics and a Distinguished University Scholar. He has also held several long and short-term visiting positions at various universities in Austria, Canada, France, Italy, and the USA. 

His first research interests were in functional analysis and ergodic theory and supervised by the two advisors Gustave Choquet and Antoine Brunel. He focused in the 80’s on the geometry of infinite dimensional Banach spaces working with such distinguished mathematicians as W. J. Johnson (Texas), J. Lindenstrauss (Jerusalem), B. Maurey (Paris) and W. Schachermayer (Vienna).

In the 90’s, Ghoussoub switched his interests to non-linear analysis, and partial differential equations, under the influence of I. Ekeland (Paris) and L. Nirenberg (NY). Nirenberg, in particular has been a great inspiration to him, both on the personal and on the academic level.

He has published over 90 research papers, including two memoirs of the AMS, and one monograph entitled Duality and Perturbation Methods in Critical Point Theory.

He has, so far, supervised ten PhD and MSc students and about a dozen postdoctoral fellows. He served as co-editor-in-chief of the Canadian Journal of Mathematics from 1993 to 2002 and has been on the editorial board of a number of various Canadian and international journals. He has also given over 150 invited lectures all over the world. These talks included the following invited plenary addresses: Mons-Belgium 97, Strobl-Austria 99, AMS western regional meeting 93, Beijing Centennial Math. Conference 98, Santiago’s Pan-American Summer Institute 03, Paris A-HYKE2 04, Erice-Sicily 05.

He was the recipient of the Coxeter-James prize in 1990, of a Killam senior fellowship in 1992 and was elected Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in 1993. In 2004, he was awarded a Doctorat Honoris Causa by the Université Paris-Dauphine. 

He was elected vice-president of the Canadian Mathematical Society for the period 1994-1996. He also served in 1995-1996 as chair of the Grant Selection Committee for Mathematics at the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).


adonis49

adonis49

adonis49

Blog Stats

  • 1,383,981 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.adonisbouh@gmail.com

Join 731 other followers

%d bloggers like this: