Adonis Diaries

Archive for May 6th, 2014

What kinds of Film Connoisseur are you? Just a reminder of a few movies…

Quiz: What is your taste in films?

Fancy yourself as a film connoisseur?

 How your tastes coincide with critical opinion with these 20 questions.

Below are a selection of films from the last two decades.

From each year, pick the ONE film that is either your favourite, or the one you’re most interested in seeing.

We’ll give you a ‘good taste’ rating out of 100, based on how closely your answers match the critical opinions collected at, this April 29, 2014


Still from the Shawshank Redemption – was it the best film of 1994? Photograph: Allstar/Cinetext/COLUMBIA

  1. 1. Pick a film from 1994

    1. Pulp Fiction
    2. The Shawshank Redemption
    3. Quiz Show
    4. Legends of the Fall
  2. 2. Pick a film from 1995

    1. Jumanji
    2. Leaving Las Vegas
    3. Apollo 13
    4. Babe
  3. 3. Pick a film from 1996

    1. Jerry Maguire
    2. Romeo + Juliet
    3. Space Jam
    4. Primal Fear
  4. 4.Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet in Titanic (1997) Pick a film from 1997

    1. Bean
    2. Titanic
    3. The Full Monty
    4. Life is Beautiful
  5. 5. Pick a film from 1998

    1. Antz
    2. Rushmore
    3. Godzilla
    4. Blade
  6. 6. Pick a film from 1999

    1. American Pie
    2. The Iron Giant
    3. The Talented Mr Ripley
    4. Fight Club
  7. 7. Pick a film from 2000

    1. Gladiator
    2. Snatch
    3. Memento
    4. The Beach
  8. 8.Spirited Away (2001) Pick a film from 2001

    1. Spirited Away
    2. Bridget Jones’s Diary
    3. Shrek
    4. Donnie Darko
  9. 9. Pick a film from 2002

    1. Ice Age
    2. About a Boy
    3. Austin Powers: Goldmember
    4. The Pianist
  10. 10. Pick a film from 2003

    1. The Matrix Reloaded
    2. Love Actually
    3. Bad Boys 2
    4. Finding Nemo
  11. 11. Pick a film from 2004

    1. The Incredibles
    2. The Passion of the Christ
    3. The Girl Next Door
    4. The Butterfly Effect
  12. 12.'V FOR VENDETTA' FILM - 2005 Pick a film from 2005

    1. V For Vendetta
    2. King Kong
    3. Brokeback Mountain
    4. Batman Begins
  13. 13. Pick a film from 2006

    1. Little Miss Sunshine
    2. The Prestige
    3. The Illusionist
    4. Children of Men
  14. 14. Pick a film from 2007

    1. Juno
    2. Transformers
    3. Knocked Up
    4. Shrek the Third
  15. 15. Pick a film from 2008

    1. Slumdog Millionaire
    2. In Bruges
    3. Cloverfield
    4. Pineapple Express
  16. 16.Fantastic Mr Fox Pick a film from 2009

    1. Avatar
    2. The Hangover
    3. (500) Days of Summer
    4. Fantastic Mr Fox
  17. 17. Pick a film from 2010

    1. Inception
    2. Black Swan
    3. Shutter Island
    4. Scott Pilgrim vs The World
  18. 18. Pick a film from 2011

    1. Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides
    2. X-Men: First Class
    3. Thor
    4. Drive
  19. 19. Pick a film from 2012

    1. Spring Breakers
    2. Magic Mike
    3. Les Misérables
    4. Skyfall
  20. 20. Pick a film from 2013

    1. Frozen
    2. After Earth
    3. Captain Phillips
    4. Gravity

Submit your answers

Fractals? Any connection with matters not related with nature?

And why should You care?

Georgemdallas posted this May 2, 2014 (selected as one of the top posts)

Fractal geometry is a field of maths born in the 1970′s and mainly developed by Benoit Mandelbrot. If you’ve already heard of fractals, you’ve probably seen the picture below.

It’s called the Mandelbrot Set and is an example of a fractal shape.


The geometry that you learnt in school was about how to make shapes; fractal geometry is no different.

While the shapes that you learnt in classical geometry were ‘smooth’, such as a circle or a triangle, the shapes that come out of fractal geometry are ‘rough’ and infinitely complex.

However fractal geometry is still about making shapes, measuring shapes and defining shapes, just like in school.

There are two reasons why you should care about fractal geometry:

1. The process by which shapes are made in fractal geometry is amazingly simple yet completely different to classical geometry. While classical geometry uses formulas to define a shape, fractal geometry uses iteration.

It therefore breaks away from giants such as Pythagoras, Plato and Euclid and heads in another direction. Classical geometry has enjoyed over 2000 years of scrutinisation, Fractal geometry has enjoyed only 40.

2. The shapes that come out of fractal geometry look like nature. This amazing fact that is hard to ignore. As we all know, there are no perfect circles in nature and no perfect squares.

Not only that, but when you look at trees or mountains or river systems they don’t resemble any shapes one is used to in maths.

However with simple formulas iterated multiple times, fractal geometry can model these natural phenomena with alarming accuracy. If you can use simple maths to make things look like the world, you know you’re onto a winner. Fractal geometry does this with ease.

This blog post shall give a quick overview of how to make fractal shapes and show how these shapes can resemble nature.

It shall go on to talk about dimensionality, which is a cool way to measure fractals. It ends by discussing how fractal geometry is also beneficial because randomness can be introduced into the structure of a fractal shape.

The post requires almost no maths and includes lot of pretty pictures

How to make a fractal shape

In normal geometry, shapes are defined by a set of rules and definitions. For instance a triangle consists of three straight lines that are connected.

The rules are that if you have the length of all three sides of the triangle it is completely defined. If you have the length of one side and two corresponding angles the triangle is also defined.

Though the rules defining a triangle are simple, huge amounts of useful maths has come out of it, for instance Pythagoras’ Theorum, sin() cos() and tan(), the proof that the shortest distance between two points is a straight line, etc.

Fractal geometry also defines shapes by rules, however these rules are different to the ones in classical geometry.

In fractal geometry a shape is made in two steps:

First by making a rule about how to change a certain (usually classically geometric) shape. This rule is then applied to the shape again and again, until infinity. In maths when you change something it is usually called a function, so what happens is that a function is applied to a shape recursively, like the diagram below.



After it has repeated an infinite amount of times, the fractal shape is produced. What are these functions then? What do you mean by repeating infinitely? As always, this is best explained by an example…

A good fractal shape is called the von Koch curve. The rules, or function, are extremely simple. First you start with a straight line. This is your ‘initial shape’:


The rules are as follows:

1. Split every straight line into 3 equal segments.

2. Replace the middle segment with an equilateral triangle, and remove the side of the triangle corresponding to the initial straight line.

The process is shown in the figure below:




This is what happens to the straight line, our initial shape, when it goes through the function the first time, the first iteration.

Now, the shape it has produced is fed back into the function again for a second iteration:





Remember the rule was that any straight line would be split into thirds, so now 4 lines are split up and made into triangles. The shape that is produced after the second iteration is then fed through the function for a third time. This gets hard to draw in MS paint so I’ve used a couple of pictures from this website for the next few stages:

von_Koch_curve (1)

After this has iterated an infinite amount of times the fractal shape is defined.

This may sound bewildering but it is still possible to analyse it mathematically and visually you can see what the shape starts to look like.

The gif below (from Wikipedia) is a good illustration of what the curve looks like by zooming in on it:



The von Koch curve is a great example of a fractal: the rule you apply is simple, yet it results in such a complex shape. This kind of shape is impossible to define using conventional maths, yet so easy to define using fractal geometry.

So who cares about the von Koch curve?

Isn’t it just mathematicians wasting time on weird shapes?

I guess that depends on how you look at it, but I’m convinced it’s useful because it looks exactly like a snowflake. This is made more clear if the initial shape you start with is a triangle rather than a straight line:


There’s a whole debate to be had on the purpose of maths, but as an Engineer I am inclined to say that one of its purposes is to try and replicate the world around us. The shapes that come out of fractal maths are so different to conventional mathematical shapes and so similar to the world around us that I cannot help but be seduced by this topic. Two other shapes that are favorites of mine are the Barnsley Fern:


And fractal trees:


These aren’t drawings or pictures, but mathematical shapes. If you look at the shapes you can see what function repeats itself. For instance on the Barsley Fern the function is to draw 30 or so perpendicular lines out of each straight line. The function repeats itself to and looks like a fern. On the tree you can see that each line branches out twice, which will be the function that repeats itself. Another property about these shapes (though strictly not for all fractals) is that they are self-similar. This means that the shape looks like itself however much you zoom in or out. For instance on the tree above, if you snapped a branch off it and stood it up, it would look like the original tree. If you took a twig from the branch and stood it up, it would still look like the original tree. Again, this is a property that occurs in nature, but until fractal geometry there was not a good way to put it into maths.

Not only do these shapes look like natural objects, but the process of iteration sounds intuitive when thinking about nature. When a tree is growing, its trunk will create branches, these branches create further branches, these branches create twigs. It’s as if the function is a genetic code telling the branch how to grow and repeat itself, eventually creating shapes that are ‘natural’. This may sound like pseudo-science (it definitely is) but I think these are concepts worth considering when you are able to imitate nature so closely.

Right enough about nature, time to talk about how fractals have crazy dimensions.


So now we know what fractal shapes are and how to make them, we would like to know a few things about them. One of them first things to try and figure out is the length of some of these shapes. Let’s go back to the von Koch curve.

In order to figure out how long the full von Koch curve is (after being iterated an infinite amount of times), it is useful to consider what happens at the first stage again:


The line is split into three, then the middle section is replaced by two lines that are as long as it (as it’s an equal triangle). So if the original straight line had a length of 1, the length of the curve after the first iteration is 4/3. It turns out that every time you iterate the shape, it gets 4/3 longer. So the length of the curve after the second iteration is 4/3 x 4/3 = 16/9:


As 4/3 is greater than 1, the line gets longer every time it is iterated through the function. As you iterate the function an infinite amount of times, the full von Koch curve has a perimeter that is infinitely long! This is the case for all fractal shapes: they have infinitely long perimeters. That isn’t useful for mathematicians so they don’t measure the perimeter of the shape. Now the next few paragraphs require a bit of abstract thought, but if you think a bit outside the box it does make sense.

The perimeter measures the length around something. Length is a 1 dimensional measure of space. Length is 1D because it only measures a straight line. A 2D measure of space is area, 3D is volume. Now we’ve shown that it isn’t useful to measure fractal patterns in 1 dimension as they are infinitely long, but what is odd is that fractal shapes are not 1D, 2D, or 3D. Each fractal shape has it’s own unique dimension, which is usually a number with a decimal place.

The dimension of a fractal shape is a measure of how quickly the shape becomes complicated when you are iterating it. What do we mean by becoming complicated? Well in the von Koch curve you can see that the first few iterations produce quite simple shapes, however at about iteration 4 it starts to become quite small and complex.

The way to measure how fast a shape becomes complicated, and hence its dimension, is to measure how much longer the perimeter gets after each iteration. This makes sense intuitively, as if the line gets much longer after each iteration it is probably becoming very complicated very fast, whereas if the line stays pretty much the same length after each iteration then it probably isn’t getting very complex.

As we’ve already shown, the von Koch curve gets 4/3 longer each iteration. This means that the von Koch curve is 4/3 D, or 1.3333…D. Pretty crazy right? It exists somewhere between 1D and 2D. But this measure is really useful to mathematicians as it gives information about the shape (whereas perimeter doesn’t, it’s always infinite). For instance if there was another fractal shape which was 1.93D, you could say with confidence that that shape gets complex quicker than the von Koch curve, as the perimeter gets 1.93 times longer after each iteration rather than 1.3333, implying it gets complex more quickly. When studying a fractal shape, knowing its dimension is of integral importance.


The last thing I’m going to talk about is the fact that randomness can be inserted into fractal shapes. Random (or seemingly random) events occur in nature all the time and affect different things in a variety of different ways, for instance a large part of Information Engineering is dealing with noise, which randomly fluctuates an electronic signal. When trying to replicate this, you usually add randomness on top of a signal. For instance in electronics you would create a nice sine wave and then add noise on top of it (borrowed from this website):


The bottom image is the ‘pure’ wave, and the top image is the wave with noise added on. An inherent assumption when doing this is that there is an underlying ‘pure’ signal which is randomly altered. While this may be true for a lot of electronics, the same cannot be said for nature. Often there isn’t a ‘pure’ shape that is randomly altered around the edges (for instance there are not many fuzzy squares in nature), but rather randomness effects the structure of the shape itself at each stage of its evolution. Classical geometry is not good at incorporating randomness into shapes, whereas fractal geometry can do it easily. For the last time lets turn to the von Koch curve. However this time we will insert randomness into it.

We know the rule is that for each iteration a triangle is created in the middle third of a line. However every time the triangles always faced ‘outwards’. We could insert randomness by saying that for each triangle created, it goes either above the line or below the line depending on a coin toss:


Now the shape will develop at random according to the coin toss. For instance after multiple iterations the von Koch curve can look like this:


Or it can look completely different. What is cool about this is that you can insert randomness into the shape itself rather than adding it on top of an existing shape. This has exciting potential, for instance (going back to nature) this may be a good way to model random genetic mutations.


This blog post has provided a brief introduction to fractal geometry. I hope you’ve found it interesting!




Blog Stats

  • 1,522,042 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by

Join 769 other subscribers
%d bloggers like this: