Gravity is Not a Force: A term designed to explain state of nature
Posted by: adonis49 on: December 5, 2014
Gravity is not a Force: A term designed to explain state of nature
Maybe I’m not saying anything new: Taking a new perspective might be the proper way for education.
The term of force, and all types of forces are terms invented to explain the state of nature, its equilibrium and unstable nature.
Two terms have material reality, and all natural laws are deduced from them:
1. Mass of bodies, including particles and the tiniest of elements
2. Movement of bodies or trajectory
Speed is a mathematical derivation of movement, and Acceleration is a derivation of speed that is linked to the notion of force on a mass or by a mass.
It is the revolutions of big masses (planets, asteroids…) on themselves and around other planets that engendered natural laws due to their respective masses.
The mass of the immediate outer atmosphere is included in the total mass of a planet, so that their volume is commensurate to their total masses.
If a planet is constituted of gases, its volume is as large as its total mass represented by the movements of the planet on itself and around the other planets, Sun and the nearest galaxy.
The shape of the movement of the planet and its mass is described by their speed and distances from the other adjacent planets, the sun and galaxy.
If the mass of a planet is changed (reduced or augmented), the shape of its movement is changed to maintain equilibrium.
As the mass of the Sun is reduced, the shape of movement of earth around the sun is altered to keep their distance in equilibrium.
Consequently, the shapes of movement of all planet are continuously changing: The ellipse shapes are altering accordingly.
For example, the speed of revolution of earth on itself is exactly the consequence of its mass in order for all “massive bodies” on it to remain grounded, otherwise, everything will be navigating off the ground at the speed of earth around the sun?
The bodies will be circulating (levitating) in levels (altitudes) according to their masses: The heavier circulating closer to the ground?
It is the centrifugal force of this rotation that keeps masses directed (falling) toward the ground
The tangential force direct earth forward on its trajectory around the sun in an elliptic shape.
For example, this zone of weightlessness (no effect of gravity) between earth and the moon is determined by the respective masses of these two bodies.
Now, as a corollary, if we need to create a reduced weightlessness atmosphere on earth, we might build an enclosure that rotate counter clockwise to earth: The closer the speed of the enclosure is to the speed of earth the more weightless is the body inside the enclosure.
For example, the “magnetic force” of the core of earth is the result of the movement and total mass of the liquid and gases in the core of earth. Reduce the mass of the core and the shape of the movement of this hot amalgam will be transformed to compensate for the reduced acceleration of the mass.
Question: What set in motion the revolution of earth on itself?
Possibly the Sun winds? These highly dense and charged particles that have great effect when earth was mostly a gaseous entity?
As earth began to acquire its own rotating cycle, matters (particles with masses) settled firmly on the surface and then created this magnetic field to repulse further “sunny winds” attacks, thus allowing organic or living creatures to be created and evolve.
Question: Has the moving magma in the core any effect on the velocity of earth on itself?
I tend to conjecture that it is the rotation of earth that set its liquid interior into movement, and thus creating the magnetic field that is preventing the outer dangerous radiations from reaching earth surface. All these radical transformation of ice ages and desert ages are the direct consequences of the altering of the magnetic field.
This alterations of earth magnetic fields were consequences to the alterations in earth speed rotation due to galactic changes, in the sun location to the center of the Milky Way galaxy.
With mankind tampering with earth environment, it is highly plausible that the movement of the core will have direct impact on the speed of earth rotation.
What make the comets and other celestial bodies (not classified as planet) so dangerous?
They don’t have magnetic fields and earth magnetic field has no repulsive effect on them to change their trajectories away from earth when they come close.
What about time?
Since nature behaviour has nothing to do with time, time is used as a mathematical factor to facilitate the derivations of many natural phenomena laws.
Attaching time as a fourth dimension for the structure of the surface of planets’ movements is purely a mathematical manipulation in order to explain a few relativity laws.
What do I know?
Just an essay to draw professional responses and get you to reflect on our state of existence and check your hypothesis.
Adonis Diaries 
Leave a Reply