Adonis Diaries

Archive for June 21st, 2015

City-flags: bad designs? 

I know what you’re thinking: “Why does that guy get to sit down?” That’s because this is radio.

 I tell radio stories about design, and I report on all kinds of stories: buildings and toothbrushes and mascots and way-finding and fonts.

My mission is to get people to engage with the design that they care about so they begin to pay attention to all forms of design.

When you decode the world with design intent in mind, the world becomes kind of magical. Instead of seeing the broken things, you see all the little bits of genius that anonymous designers have sweated over to make our lives better.

And that’s essentially the definition of design: making life better and providing joy. And few things give me greater joy than a well-designed flag.

Happy 50th anniversary on your flag, Canada. It is beautiful, gold standard. Love it.

1:18 I’m kind of obsessed with flags. Sometimes I bring up the topic of flags, and people are like, “I don’t care about flags,” and then we start talking about flags, and trust me, 100%  of people care about flags. There’s just something about them that works on our emotions.

1:36 My family wrapped my Christmas presents as flags this year, including the blue gift bag that’s dressed up as the flag of Scotland.

I put this picture online, and sure enough, within the first few minutes, someone left a comment that said, “You can take that Scottish Saltire and shove it up your ass.” (Laughter) Which — see, people are passionate about flags, you know? That’s the way it is.

2:01 What I love about flags is that once you understand the design of flags, what makes a good flag, what makes a bad flag, you can understand the design of almost anything.

So what I’m going to do here is, I cracked open an episode of my radio show, 99% Invisible,” and I’m going to reconstruct it here on stage, so when I press a button over here — Voice: S for Sound — Roman Mars: It’s going to make a sound, and so whenever you hear a sound or a voice or a piece of music, it’s because I pressed a button.

2:29 Voice: Sssssound.

2:31 RM: All right, got it? Here we go. Three, two.

2:38 This is 99% Invisible. I’m Roman Mars.

2:47 Narrator: The five basic principles of flag design.

2:50 Roman Mars: According to the North American Vexillological Association. Vexillological.

2:55 Ted Kaye: Vexillology is the study of flags.

2:58 RM: It’s that extra “lol” that makes it sound weird.

3:01 Narrator: Number one, keep it simple. The flag should be so simple that a child can draw it from memory.

3:06 RM: Before I moved to Chicago in 2005, I didn’t even know cities had their own flags.

3:10 TK: Most larger cities do have flags.

3:12 RM: Well, I didn’t know that. That’s Ted Kaye, by the way.

3:15 TK: Hello. RM: He’s a flag expert. He’s a totally awesome guy.

3:18 TK: I’m Ted Kaye. I have edited a scholarly journal on flag studies, and I am currently involved with the Portland Flag Association and the North American Vexillological Association.

3:28 RM: Ted literally wrote the book on flag design.

3:31 Narrator: “Good Flag, Bad Flag.”

3:33 RM: It’s more of a pamphlet, really. It’s about 16 pages.

3:36 TK: Yes, it’s called “Good Flag, Bad Flag: How to Design a Great Flag.”

3:40 RM: And that first city flag I discovered in Chicago is a beaut: white field, two horizontal blue stripes, and four six-pointed red stars down the middle.

3:51 Narrator: Number two: use meaningful symbolism.

3:54 TK: The blue stripes represent the water, the river and the lake.

3:57 Narrator: The flag’s images, colors or pattern should relate to what it symbolizes.

4:01 TK: The red stars represent significant events in Chicago’s history.

RM: Namely, the founding of Fort Dearborn on the future site of Chicago, the Great Chicago Fire, the World Columbian Exposition, which everyone remembers because of the White City, and the Century of Progress Exposition, which no one remembers at all.

4:20 Narrator: Number three, use two to three basic colors.

4:23 TK: The basic rule for colors is to use two to three colors from the standard color set: red, white, blue, green, yellow and black.

4:32 RM: The design of the Chicago flag has complete buy-in with an entire cross-section of the city. It is everywhere; every municipal building flies the flag.

4:40 Whet Moser: Like, there’s probably at least one store on every block near where I work that sells some sort of Chicago flag paraphernalia.

4:47 RM: That’s Whet Moser from Chicago magazine.

4:49 WM: Today, just for example, I went to get a haircut, and when I sat down in the barber’s chair, there was a Chicago flag on the box that the barber kept all his tools in, and then in the mirror there was a Chicago flag on the wall behind me. When I left, a guy passed me who had a Chicago flag badge on his backpack.

RM: It’s adaptable and remixable. The six-pointed stars in particular show up in all kinds of places.

WM: The coffee I bought the other day had a Chicago star on it.

RM: It’s a distinct symbol of Chicago pride.

TK: When a police officer or a firefighter dies in Chicago, often it’s not the flag of the United States on his casket. It can be the flag of the city of Chicago. That’s how deeply the flag has gotten into the civic imagery of Chicago.

5:36 RM: And it isn’t just that people love Chicago and therefore love the flag. I also think that people love Chicago more because the flag is so cool.

5:46 TK: A positive feedback loop there between great symbolism and civic pride.

5:51 RM: Okay. So when I moved back to San Francisco in 2008, I researched its flag, because I had never seen it in the previous eight years I lived there. And I found it, I am sorry to say, sadly lacking.

 I know. It hurts me, too.

6:14 TK: Well, let me start from the top.

6:16 Narrator: Number one, keep it simple. TK: Keeping it simple.

6:20 Narrator: The flag should be so simple that a child can draw it from memory.

6:23 TK: It’s a relatively complex flag.

6:25 RM: Okay, here we go. Okay. The main component of the San Francisco flag is a phoenix representing the city rising from the ashes after the devastating fires of the 1850s.

6:35 TK: A powerful symbol for San Francisco.

6:37 RM: I still don’t really dig the phoenix. Design-wise, it manages to both be too crude and have too many details at the same time, which if you were trying for that, you wouldn’t be able to do it, and it just looks bad at a distance, but having deep meaning puts that element in the plus column.

Behind the phoenix, the background is mostly white, and then it has a substantial gold border around it.

7:01 TK: Which is a very attractive design element.

7:03 RM: I think it’s okay. But — (Laughter) — here come the big no-nos of flag design.

7:09 Narrator: Number four, no lettering or seals. Never use writing of any kind.

7:14 RM: Underneath the phoenix, there’s a motto on a ribbon that translates to “Gold in peace, iron in war,” plus — and this is the big problem — it says San Francisco across the bottom.

7:25 TK: If you need to write the name of what you’re representing on your flag, your symbolism has failed.

7:31 (Laughter) (Applause)

7:35 RM: The United States flag doesn’t say “USA” across the front.

In fact, country flags, they tend to behave. Like, hats off to South Africa and Turkey and Israel and Somalia and Japan and Gambia.

There’s a bunch of really great country flags, but they obey good design principles because the stakes are high. They’re on the international stage.

But city, state and regional flags are another story.

There is a scourge of bad flags, and they must be stopped.That is the truth and that is the dare. The first step is to recognize that we have a problem.

A lot of people tend to think that good design is just a matter of taste, and quite honestly, sometimes it is, actually, but sometimes it isn’t, all right? Here’s the full list of NAVA flag design principles.

8:37 Narrator: The five basic principles of flag design. Number one. TK: Keep it simple. Narrator: Number two. TK: Use meaningful symbolism.

8:45 Narrator: Number three. TK: Use two to three basic colors.

8:48 Narrator: Number four. TK: No lettering or seals.

8:50 Narrator: Never use writing of any kind.

8:52 TK: Because you can’t read that at a distance.

8:54 Narrator: Number five. TK: And be distinctive.

8:56 RM: All the best flags tend to stick to these principles. And like I said before, most country flags are okay.

But here’s the thing: if you showed this list of principles to any designer of almost anything, they would say these principles — simplicity, deep meaning, having few colors or being thoughtful about colors, uniqueness, don’t have writing you can’t read — all those principles apply to them, too.

But sadly, good design principles are rarely invoked in U.S. city flags. Our biggest problem seems to be that fourth one.

We just can’t stop ourselves from putting our names on our flags, or little municipal seals with tiny writing on them. Here’s the thing about municipal seals: They were designed to be on pieces of paper where you can read them, not on flags 100 feet away flapping in the breeze.

9:43 So here’s a bunch of flags again. Vexillologists call these SOBs: seals on a bedsheet — (Laughter) — and if you can’t tell what city they go to, yeah, that’s exactly the problem, except for Anaheim, apparently. They fixed it. (Laughter)

10:01 These flags are everywhere in the U.S.

The European equivalent of the municipal seal is the city coat of arms, and this is where we can learn a lesson for how to do things right.

So this is the city coat of arms of Amsterdam. Now, if this were a United States city, the flag would probably look like this. You know, yeah. (Laughter) But instead, the flag of Amsterdam looks like this. Rather than plopping the whole coat of arms on a solid background and writing “Amsterdam” below it, they just take the key elements of the escutcheon, the shield, and they turn it into the most badass city flag in the world. (Laughter) (Applause)

10:44 And because it’s so badass, those flags and crosses are found throughout Amsterdam, just like Chicago, they’re used.

10:52 Even though seal-on-a-bedsheet flags are particularly painful and offensive to me, nothing can quite prepare you for one of the biggest train wrecks in vexillological history. Are you ready? It’s the flag of Milwaukee, Wisconsin.  I mean, it’s distinctive, I’ll give them that.

11:22 Steve Kodis: It was adopted in 1955.

11:25 RM: The city ran a contest and gathered a bunch of submissions with all kinds of designs.

11:30 SK: And an alderman by the name of Fred Steffan cobbled together parts of the submissions to make what is now the Milwaukee flag.

11:40 RM: It’s a kitchen sink flag. There’s a gigantic gear representing industry, there’s a ship recognizing the port, a giant stalk of wheat paying homage to the brewing industry. It’s a hot mess, and Steve Kodis, a graphic designer from Milwaukee, wants to change it.

11:59 SK: It’s really awful. It’s a misstep on the city’s behalf, to say the least.

12:06 RM: But what puts the Milwaukee flag over the top, almost to the point of self-parody, is on it is a picture of the Civil War battle flag of the Milwaukee regiment.

12:17 SK: So that’s the final element in it that just makes it that much more ridiculous, that there is a flag design within the Milwaukee flag.

12:31 (Music)

12:32 Now, Milwaukee is a fantastic city. I’ve been there. I love it. The most depressing part of this flag, though, is that there have been two major redesign contests. The last one was held in 2001. One hundred and five entries were received.

12:47 TK: But in the end, the members of the Milwaukee Arts Board decided that none of the new entries were worthy of flying over the city.

12:53 RM: They couldn’t agree to change that thing! (Laughter) That’s discouraging enough to make you think that good design and democracy just simply do not go together. But Steve Kotas is going to try one more time to redesign the Milwaukee flag.

13:09 SK: I believe Milwaukee is a great city. Every great city deserves a great flag.

13:14 RM: Steve isn’t ready to reveal his design yet. One of the things about proposing one of these things is you have to get people on board, and then you reveal your design.

But here’s the trick: If you want to design a great flag, a kickass flag like Chicago’s or D.C.’s, which also has a great flag, start by drawing a one-by-one-and-a-half- inch rectangle on a piece of paper. Your design has to fit within that tiny rectangle. Here’s why.

13:38 TK: A three-by-five-foot flag on a pole 100 feet away looks about the same size as a one-by-one-and-a-half-inch rectangle seen about 15 inches from your eye. You’d be surprised by how compelling and simple the design can be when you hold yourself to that limitation.

14:00 RM: Meanwhile, back in San Francisco. Is there anything we can do?

14:04 TK: I like to say that in every bad flag there’s a good flag trying to get out. (Laughter) The way to make San Francisco’s flag a good flag is to take the motto off because you can’t read that at a distance. Take the name off, and the border might even be made thicker, so it’s more a part of the flag. And I would simply take the phoenix and make it a great big element in the middle of the flag.

14:26 RM: But the current phoenix, that’s got to go.

14:29 TK: I would simplify or stylize the phoenix. Depict a big, wide-winged bird coming out of flames. Emphasize those flames.

14:38 RM: So this San Francisco flag was designed by Frank Chimero based on Ted Kaye’s suggestions. I don’t know what he would do if we was completely unfettered and didn’t follow those guidelines. Fans of my radio show and podcast, they’ve heard me complain about bad flags. They’ve sent me other suggested designs. This one’s by Neil Mussett. Both are so much better. And I think if they were adopted, I would see them around the city.

15:03 In my crusade to make flags of the world more beautiful, many listeners have taken it upon themselves to redesign their flags and look into the feasibility of getting them officially adopted. If you see your city flag and like it, fly it, even if it violates a design rule or two. I don’t care. But if you don’t see your city flag, maybe it doesn’t exist, but maybe it does, and it just sucks, and I dare you to join the effort to try to change that.

15:34 As we move more and more into cities, the city flag will become not just a symbol of that city as a place, but also it could become a symbol of how that city considers design itself, especially today, as the populace is becoming more design-aware. And I think design awareness is at an all-time high. A well-designed flag could be seen as an indicator of how a city considers all of its design systems: its public transit, its parks, its signage. It might seem frivolous, but it’s not.

16:08 TK: Often when city leaders say, “We have more important things to do than worry about a city flag,” my response is, “If you had a great city flag, you would have a banner for people to rally under to face those more important things.”

16:25 RM: I’ve seen firsthand what a good city flag can do in the case of Chicago. The marriage of good design and civic pride is something that we need in all places. The best part about municipal flags is that we own them. They are an open-source, publicly owned design language of the community.

When they are done well, they are remixable, adaptable, and they are powerful. We could control the branding and graphical imagery of our cities with a good flag, but instead, by having bad flags we don’t use, we cede that territory to sports teams and chambers of commerce and tourism boards. Sports teams can leave and break our hearts. And besides, some of us don’t really care about sports.

And tourism campaigns can just be cheesy. But a great city flag is something that represents a city to its people and its people to the world at large. And when that flag is a beautiful thing, that connection is a beautiful thing.

So maybe all the city flags can be as inspiring as Hong Kong or Portland or Trondheim, and we can do away with all the bad flags like San Francisco, Milwaukee, Cedar Rapids, and finally, when we’re all done, we can do something about Pocatello, Idaho, considered by the North American Vexillological Association as the worst city flag in North America.  That thing has a trademark symbol on it, people. (Laughter) That hurts me just to look at.

Doctors make mistakes. The best medicine is for them to admit it!


From the wrong diagnosis to the wrong prescription, medical errors kill more than bullets in this country—and injure many more.

Until doctors break their code of silence, the cure is a long way off.

When they save lives, and they often do, doctors are treated like gods. Lebanese doctors even manage to believe they really are.

No one is as unreachable as your doctors, they make you wait, they treat to you as if you are stupid, they barely talk to you, they don’t make an effort to explain your problem, and they never give you enough time.

But it’s all ok! because they make you feel better, they make the ones you love feel better, and one day, they will save your life.

But what happens when they make mistakes?

should we still treat them like gods and gods are never judged? or should we punish them like normal human beings?

In my humble opinion, the answer is “none of the above”, and here is why.

1- Let’s all agree that no one is untouchable and doctor or no doctor, whoever makes a mistake needs to pay, and people who pay for their mistakes tend to learn and make less mistakes afterward.

While on the other hand, whoever knows is untouchable, will naturally pay less attention and make more mistakes.

It is also said that people learn from their mistakes? So how are doctors learning how is the med. community learning to avoid future errors?

2- Doctors cannot and should not pay for their mistakes the way we do…

I mean take me for example, a blogger with poor English skills, if I make a mistake no one cares, same for a car dealer or a graphic designer or an architect, for us, mistakes have no, to very little consequences.

Except if you are messi and you miss a penalty in the champions league final, than you are a god and you will be punished like a human being….

Now imagine if every time you make a mistake someone dies, would you still write?

Would you still shoot the penalty? would you still sell cars? or draw buildings or design logos?… I wouldn’t… and I personally don’t believe doctor needs to be treated and punished the same way we do.

So yes it’s true dear doctor that you give birth, save lives, give hope, draw smiles, announce death and new lives.

It’s also true that this might give you the feeling that you are a god, but you are not…

And even if you were, nothing justifies not admitting your mistakes and taking some responsibility.

And sometimes, for those who are victims of your mistakes, admitting you did, can bring them a lot of comfort, and this is what you are supposed to do.

And I Defaulted on My Student Loans

June 6, 2015

One late summer afternoon when I was 17, I went with my mother to the local bank, a long-defunct institution whose name I cannot remember, to apply for my first student loan.

My mother co-signed. When we finished, the banker, a balding man in his late 50s, congratulated us, as if I had just won some kind of award rather than signed away my young life.

By the end of my sophomore year at a small private liberal arts college, my mother and I had taken out a second loan, my father had declared bankruptcy and my parents had divorced.

My mother could no longer afford the tuition that the student loans weren’t covering. I transferred to a state college in New Jersey, closer to home.

Years later, I found myself confronted with a choice that too many people have had to and will have to face.

I could give up what had become my vocation (in my case, being a writer) and take a job that I didn’t want in order to repay the huge debt I had accumulated in college and graduate school.

Or I could take what I had been led to believe was both the morally and legally reprehensible step of defaulting on my student loans, which was the only way I could survive without wasting my life in a job that had nothing to do with my particular usefulness to society.

I chose life. That is to say, I defaulted on my student loans.

As difficult as it has been, I’ve never looked back.

The millions of young people today, who collectively owe over $1 trillion in loans, may want to consider my example.

It struck me as absurd that one could amass crippling debt as a result, not of drug addiction or reckless borrowing and spending, but of going to college. Having opened a new life to me beyond my modest origins, the education system was now going to call in its chits and prevent me from pursuing that new life, simply because I had the misfortune of coming from modest origins.

Am I a deadbeat? In the eyes of the law I am.

Indifferent to the claim that repaying student loans is the road to character? Yes.

Blind to the reality of countless numbers of people struggling to repay their debts, no matter their circumstances, many worse than mine? My heart goes out to them. To my mind, they have learned to live with a social arrangement that is legal, but not moral.

Maybe the problem was that I had reached beyond my lower-middle-class origins and taken out loans to attend a small private college to begin with. Maybe I should have stayed at a store called The Wild Pair, where I once had a nice stable job selling shoes after dropping out of the state college because I thought I deserved better, and naïvely tried to turn myself into a professional reader and writer on my own, without a college degree. I’d probably be district manager by now.

Or maybe, after going back to school, I should have gone into finance, or some other lucrative career.

Self-disgust and lifelong unhappiness, destroying a precious young life — all this is a small price to pay for meeting your student loan obligations.

Some people will maintain that a bankrupt father, an impecunious background and impractical dreams are just the luck of the draw. Someone with character would have paid off those loans and let the chips fall where they may. But I have found, after some decades on this earth, that the road to character is often paved with family money and family connections, not to mention 14% effective tax rates on seven-figure incomes.

Moneyed stumbles never seem to have much consequence. Tax fraud, insider trading, almost criminal nepotism — these won’t knock you off the straight and narrow. But if you’re poor and miss a child-support payment, or if you’re middle class and default on your student loans, then God help you.

Forty years after I took out my first student loan, and 30 years after getting my last, the Department of Education is still pursuing the unpaid balance. My mother, who co-signed some of the loans, is dead. The banks that made them have all gone under.

I doubt that anyone can even find the promissory notes. The accrued interest, combined with the collection agencies’ opulent fees, is now several times the principal.

Even the Internal Revenue Service understands the irrationality of pursuing someone with an unmanageable economic burden. It has a program called Offer in Compromise that allows struggling people who have fallen behind in their taxes to settle their tax debt.

The Department of Education makes it hard for you, and ugly. But it is possible to survive the life of default. You might want to follow these steps: Get as many credit cards as you can before your credit is ruined.

Find a stable housing situation.

Pay your rent on time so that you have a good record in that area when you do have to move.

Live with or marry someone with good credit (preferably someone who shares your desperate nihilism).

When the fateful day comes, and your credit looks like a war zone, don’t be afraid. The reported consequences of having no credit are scare talk, to some extent.

The reliably predatory nature of American life guarantees that there will always be somebody to help you, from credit card companies charging stratospheric interest rates to subprime loans for houses and cars.

Our economic system ensures that so long as you are willing to sink deeper and deeper into debt, you will keep being enthusiastically invited to play the economic game.

I am sharply aware of the strongest objection to my lapse into default. If everyone acted as I did, chaos would result. The entire structure of American higher education would change.

The collection agencies retained by the Department of Education would be exposed as the greedy vultures that they are. The government would get out of the loan-making and the loan-enforcement business. Congress might even explore a special, universal education tax that would make higher education affordable.

There would be a national shaming of colleges and universities for charging soaring tuition rates that are reaching lunatic levels. The rapacity of American colleges and universities is turning social mobility, the keystone of American freedom, into a commodified farce.

If people groaning under the weight of student loans simply said, “Enough,” then all the pieties about debt that have become absorbed into all the pieties about higher education might be brought into alignment with reality. Instead of guaranteeing loans, the government would have to guarantee a college education. There are a lot of people who could learn to live with that, too.




June 2015

Blog Stats

  • 1,519,188 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by

Join 764 other subscribers
%d bloggers like this: