Adonis Diaries

Archive for October 7th, 2016



Not voting leads to an outcome as much as voting does.

You’re still responsible, even if you didn’t actively participate.

In any situation, not stating your opinion allows things to move forward. Silence is not nothing, it is still an action. (The action of an apathetic entity?)

No sense hiding, from yourself or anyone else.

(Vote: at least you have this legitimacy of accounting for the victor’s failures and opacity)


The math behind basketball’s wildest moves

Rajiv Maheswaran. Posted Jul 2015

My colleagues and I are fascinated by the science of moving dots. So what are these dots?

it’s all of us. we’re moving in our homes, in our offices, as we shop and travel throughout our cities and around the world.

And wouldn’t it be great if we could understand all this movement? If we could find patterns and meaning and insight in it.

luckily for us, we live in a time where we’re incredibly good at capturing information about ourselves. So whether it’s through sensors or videos, or apps, we can track our movement with incredibly fine detail.

0:47 it turns out one of the places where we have the best data about movement is sports. So whether it’s basketball or baseball, or football or the other football, we’re instrumenting our stadiums and our players to track their movements every fraction of a second.

what we’re doing is turning our athletes into moving dots.

we’ve got mountains of moving dots and like most raw data, it’s hard to deal with and not that interesting. But there are things that, for example, basketball coaches want to know. And the problem is they can’t know them because they’d have to watch every second of every game, remember it and process it.

And a person can’t do that, but a machine can. The problem is a machine can’t see the game with the eye of a coach. At least they couldn’t until now. So what have we taught the machine to see?

we started simply. We taught the machine things like passes, shots and rebounds. Things that most casual fans would know. And then we moved on to things slightly more complicated. Events like post-ups, and pick-and-rolls, and isolations.

if you don’t know them, that’s okay. Most casual players probably do. Now, we’ve gotten to a point where today, the machine understands complex events like down screens and wide pins. Basically things only professionals know. we have taught a machine to see with the eyes of a coach.

how have we been able to do this? If I asked a coach to describe something like a pick-and-roll, they would give me a description, and if I encoded that as an algorithm, it would be terrible. The pick-and-roll happens to be this dance in basketball between four players, two on offense and two on defense. And here’s kind of how it goes. So there’s the guy on offense without the ball and he goes next to the guy guarding the guy with the ball, and he kind of stays there and they both move and stuff happens, and ta-da, it’s a pick-and-roll.

that is also an example of a terrible algorithm. So, if the player who’s the interferer — he’s called the screener — goes close by, but he doesn’t stop, it’s probably not a pick-and-roll. Or if he does stop, but he doesn’t stop close enough, it’s probably not a pick-and-roll.

Or, if he does go close by and he does stop but they do it under the basket, it’s probably not a pick-and-roll.

Or I could be wrong, they could all be pick-and-rolls. It really depends on the exact timing, the distances, the locations, and that’s what makes it hard.

So, luckily, with machine learning, we can go beyond our own ability to describe the things we know.

 how does this work? Well, it’s by example. So we go to the machine and say, “Good morning, machine. Here are some pick-and-rolls, and here are some things that are not. Please find a way to tell the difference.”

And the key to all of this is to find features that enable it to separate. if I was going to teach it the difference between an apple and orange, I might say, “Why don’t you use color or shape?”

And the problem that we’re solving is, what are those things? What are the key features that let a computer navigate the world of moving dots?

figuring out all these relationships with relative and absolute location, distance, timing, velocities — that’s really the key to the science of moving dots, or as we like to call it, spatiotemporal pattern recognition, in academic vernacular. Because the first thing is, you have to make it sound hard — because it is.

The key thing is, for NBA coaches, it’s not that they want to know whether a pick-and-roll happened or not. It’s that they want to know how it happened.

And why is it so important to them? So here’s a little insight. It turns out in modern basketball, this pick-and-roll is perhaps the most important play. And knowing how to run it, and knowing how to defend it, is basically a key to winning and losing most games.

it turns out that this dance has a great many variations and identifying the variations is really the thing that matters, and that’s why we need this to be really, really good.

here’s an example. There are two offensive and two defensive players, getting ready to do the pick-and-roll dance. So the guy with ball can either take, or he can reject. His teammate can either roll or pop. The guy guarding the ball can either go over or under. His teammate can either show or play up to touch, or play soft and together they can either switch or blitz and I didn’t know most of these things when I started and it would be lovely if everybody moved according to those arrows.

It would make our lives a lot easier, but it turns out movement is very messy. People wiggle a lot and getting these variations identified with very high accuracy, both in precision and recall, is tough because that’s what it takes to get a professional coach to believe in you. And despite all the difficulties with the right spatiotemporal features we have been able to do that.

Coaches trust our ability of our machine to identify these variations. We’re at the point where almost every single contender for an NBA championship this year is using our software, which is built on a machine that understands the moving dots of basketball.

not only that, we have given advice that has changed strategies that have helped teams win very important games, and it’s very exciting because you have coaches who’ve been in the league for 30 years that are willing to take advice from a machine.

it’s very exciting, it’s much more than the pick-and-roll. Our computer started out with simple things and learned more and more complex things and now it knows so many things. Frankly, I don’t understand much of what it does, and while it’s not that special to be smarter than me, we were wondering, can a machine know more than a coach? Can it know more than person could know? And it turns out the answer is yes.

The coaches want players to take good shots. So if I’m standing near the basket and there’s nobody near me, it’s a good shot. If I’m standing far away surrounded by defenders, that’s generally a bad shot. But we never knew how good “good” was, or how bad “bad” was quantitatively. Until now.

what we can do, again, using spatiotemporal features, we looked at every shot. We can see: Where is the shot? What’s the angle to the basket? Where are the defenders standing? What are their distances? What are their angles?

For multiple defenders, we can look at how the player’s moving and predict the shot type. We can look at all their velocities and we can build a model that predicts what is the likelihood that this shot would go in under these circumstances?

why is this important? We can take something that was shooting, which was one thing before, and turn it into two things: the quality of the shot and the quality of the shooter. So here’s a bubble chart, because what’s TED without a bubble chart?

Those are NBA players. The size is the size of the player and the color is the position. On the x-axis, we have the shot probability. People on the left take difficult shots, on the right, they take easy shots. On the [y-axis] is their shooting ability.

People who are good are at the top, bad at the bottom. So for example, if there was a player who generally made 47 percent of their shots, that’s all you knew before. But today, I can tell you that player takes shots that an average NBA player would make 49 percent of the time, and they are two percent worse.

And the reason that’s important is that there are lots of 47s out there. And so it’s really important to know if the 47 that you’re considering giving 100 million dollars to is a good shooter who takes bad shots or a bad shooter who takes good shots. Machine understanding doesn’t just change how we look at players, it changes how we look at the game.

there was this very exciting game a couple of years ago, in the NBA finals. Miami was down by three, there was 20 seconds left. They were about to lose the championship. A gentleman named LeBron James came up and he took a three to tie. He missed. His teammate Chris Bosh got a rebound, passed it to another teammate named Ray Allen. He sank a three. It went into overtime.

They won the game. They won the championship. It was one of the most exciting games in basketball. And our ability to know the shot probability for every player at every second, and the likelihood of them getting a rebound at every second can illuminate this moment in a way that we never could before. Now unfortunately, I can’t show you that video. But for you, we recreated that moment at our weekly basketball game about 3 weeks ago.

And we recreated the tracking that led to the insights. So, here is us. This is Chinatown in Los Angeles, a park we play at every week, and that’s us recreating the Ray Allen moment and all the tracking that’s associated with it. So, here’s the shot.

I’m going to show you that moment and all the insights of that moment. The only difference is, instead of the professional players, it’s us, and instead of a professional announcer, it’s me. So, bear with me.

9:52 Miami. Down three. Twenty seconds left. Jeff brings up the ball. Josh catches, puts up a three!

10:03 [Calculating shot probability]

10:06 [Shot quality]

10:08 [Rebound probability]

10:11 Won’t go!

10:12 [Rebound probability]

10:14 Rebound, Noel. Back to Daria.

10:17 [Shot quality]

10:21 Her three-pointer — bang! Tie game with five seconds left. The crowd goes wild.

10:27 (Laughter)

10:29 That’s roughly how it happened.

10:30 (Applause)

10:31 Roughly.

10:33 (Applause) That moment had about a nine percent chance of happening in the NBA and we know that and a great many other things. I’m not going to tell you how many times it took us to make that happen.

10:46 (Laughter)

10:48 Okay, I will! It was four.

10:50 (Laughter)

10:51 Way to go, Daria.

But the important thing about that video and the insights we have for every second of every NBA game — it’s not that. It’s the fact you don’t have to be a professional team to track movement. You do not have to be a professional player to get insights about movement.

In fact, it doesn’t even have to be about sports because we’re moving everywhere. We’re moving in our homes, in our offices, as we shop and we travel throughout our cities and around our world. What will we know? What will we learn?

Perhaps, instead of identifying pick-and-rolls, a machine can identify the moment and let me know when my daughter takes her first steps. Which could literally be happening any second now.

11:47 Perhaps we can learn to better use our buildings, better plan our cities. I believe that with the development of the science of moving dots, we will move better, we will move smarter, we will move forward.




October 2016

Blog Stats

  • 1,516,338 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by

Join 822 other subscribers
%d bloggers like this: