Archive for July 12th, 2019
Experiencing Pain means you are living: Early actions let you live better…
Posted by: adonis49 on: July 12, 2019
Pain is living: Early actions let you live better
The trouble with pain is ignoring it.
Toothaches begin as dull twinges. Tumors are coughs. Before long, fillings are root canals and tumors are death.
Toothaches and tumors never magically go away.
I’m not ready to check with a physician means it doesn’t hurt enough.
By Dan Rockwell?
Pain is a slow sunrise, quiet. But, noon always comes. Listen to pain in the morning; don’t wait for noon.
Courage:
Life without pain is death.
Leaders courageously listen for pains voice. Delay invites damage. Pain is not the enemy. Invite it in for a chat. “Damn that hurts.”
The role of pain:
- Pain screams “something’s wrong” but doesn’t solve or correct.
- Pain points to symptoms not root problems.
- Pain is a consequence not a cause, at least at first.
- Pain succeeds when we look for causes and cures.
- Pain solves when stopping is enough.
- Everything that hurts isn’t bad.
Distraction:
“Just make it stop,” is a distraction. Leaders look through pain to find real issues.
Under-performing employees are the toothache, but the root problem may be organizational, for example.
Correcting under-performers may provide surface solutions; developing organizations capacities provides deep cures.
Dull ache:
You’re feeling dull aches that suggest intervention.
- Relational aches.
- Staff malfunctions.
- Inner dissatisfaction.
- Customer distress.
- Procedure failures.
Approach:
- Point out pain-points and ask, “What’s behind this issue?”
- “Is it escalating or de-escalating?”
- “Does this situation require intervention? Why or why not?”
- “What are you doing about it?”
- “How can I help?”
- “Can we solve this with current or new procedures?”
- “Tell me more next week.”
All leaders have stories of toothaches that turned to root canals and tumors that killed.
I’m not ready means it doesn’t hurt enough.
Leaders don’t address every issue; they give space for others to find solutions. However, leaders always monitor pain-points. Don’t pretend they’ll go away.
Do you tend to delay too long, act too quick, or move-in on pain-points at just the right moment?
How do you address pain-points?
Note: For terminally ill patients, when all kinds of tranquilizers stop functioning, do you believe a patient still keep thinking: “As long as I’m in pain, then I’m alive?”
A plausible settlement for the “Deal of Century” to both Palestinians and Israelis
Posted by: adonis49 on: July 12, 2019
A plausible settlement for the “Deal of Century” to both Palestinians and Israelis
Note: The created State of Israel by the colonial powers has all the blueprints of a colonial occupation of a land by force. The State of Israel, with all the determination of the colonial powers to keep it alive and floating financially, politically and militarily, has gone way too far in its brutality, its calamitous myths, and unwavering decision to wipe out the culture and identity of the Palestinian people.
This article, (dated on November 13, 2008) is a temporary resolution until the far-right Israelis desist from their occupation mentality and reach a reasonable state of common status of living together with Palestinians on equal rights. Until then, Israel is our existential enemy.
There are reams and reams of plans and counter plans and resolution suggested to containing this everlasting unjust and uncalled for reality of the 20th century monstrosity that permitted the establishment of the State of Israel by displacing its original inhabitants (the Palestinians), as so many monstrosities in this century.
There are two viable solutions for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, short of exterminating one party or the other or most probably both, that has been spreading death, disabilities, miseries, indignities and humiliation since 1920.
The Israeli Olmert PM has lately declared that the time to facing truth has come.
Since the Madrid convention in 1990 among the “Arab States” (excluding Syria) and Israeli delegations and mediated by the US Administration, during the Bush Sr. tenure as President, for a resolution of this conflict, it was becoming evident that the “Biblical” strategy of Israel, for further expansion and pre-emptive wars, is no longer tenable, especially after its total failure in 2006 of invading Lebanon.
A resolution was contemplated but the US had an old battle plan to invade Iraq before resolving this conflict.
The Bush “Son” Jr. administration dusted off this war plan and invaded Iraq. This invasion has failed miserably but Israel is no longer necessary for the strategic interest of the US in the Middle East: The US has military bases in the Arab Gulf States and Saudi Kingdom, and it has many heavy weight allies among the Arabic States.
And the price of oil on the market is far cheaper than physically securing its exploitation and distribution in Iraq or elsewhere or even resuming plans to intimidating China and blackmailing her by outdated military presence in Iraq.
The return of the heavy investments of the US in Israel has been reflecting sharp negative rates of return for decades, politically, economically, and socially within the US society and foreign policies.
My plan is of two phases:
The first phase is recognizing the State of Palestine by the United Nation, a State self-autonomous, independent and all. It is of primordial interest by the world community and the Jewish State that the Palestinian people recover their dignity and rights as a full fledged State and be permitted to exercise the complex task of administering and governing a State.
At least from a psychological necessity, the Palestinian people should feel that persistent resistance and countless “martyrs” for re-establishing their rights as legitimate and independent people have brought fruits, as any genuine national resistance ultimately should.
The second phase is the merging of the two States of Palestine and Israel into a confederate State with a central government and several self-autonomous “cantons”. I can envisage the following cantons: West Bank, Gaza (including Escalon), Galilee (including Haifa and Akka), Judea (around Jerusalem and Bethlehem), the “East Shore” (Tel Aviv, Yafa), and the Negev (including Akaba).
I have this impression that the tight religious extremists on both sides would opt to move to Gaza and Judea, and the very secular citizens would move to the East Shore or Galilee, and the economically minded people might reside in the Negev backed by strong financial incentives.
The second phase will witness the return of the Palestinian refugees as ordered by the UN resolution of 193 in 1948 and the refugees would have the right to select the canton of their preferences.
I can foresee that the key offices in the central government would be equally, including genders, shared by the Palestinians and Israelis on a rotation imposed law.
The representation in the cantons would be proportional to the general census of the period (at 5 years intervals). The representation among sects, factions, or other types of social divisions within each “people” would also follow the proportions in the census.
I suggest to the interest of the future “Palesrael” State that Israel let Lebanon structure and experience, without foreign interventions, study the pitfalls and strength of such a system of co-existence and avoid the unnecessary miseries of minor civil wars and countless frustrations in its future unfolding.
It would be inevitable that the State of “Palesreal” be guaranteed a neutrality status (No pre-emptive wars within and outside its borders) by the world community and the regional powers. It is evident that this could be plausible after Syria recover all its lands and settles on a political constitution that safeguard its autonomous decisions.
Then, it is hoped and strongly desired that the State of Lebanon would secure this neutrally status. Amen.