For when the Near East Levant Common Market? Economically, financially and trade?
Posted by: adonis49 on: April 25, 2020
For when the Near East Levant Union States? Economically, financially and trade?
Note 1: Re-edit of “Near East: Levant Union States (LUS)?” that I posted more than 15 years ago
Note 2: This union totally exclude the implanted colonial entity Israel, which is our existential enemy.
Levant (Rising sun with respect to Europe) is the name given by the French mandated power to the Near East independent States of Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Palestine. Many prefer to include Iraq since it is the vastest trade market for the adjacent States that the colonial powers divided after WWI.
The current total population of the Levant is about 35 millions (excluding Iraq), or less than half each of Turkey, Iran, or the third of Egypt and about the number in Iraq, and the Arabian Peninsula (all bordering the Levant region).
Thus, focusing on internal trades among the Near East States will not make a serious dent toward expanding economic development in the short-term, but that is the best economic strategy for establishing a complementary economy that satisfy internal needs.
At least 70% of the land of this union is mostly desert and its total area is barely the third of France, but it is relatively rich in water compared to the neighboring larger States with the exception of Turkey.
The advantages of a policy of opening up the borders among these States for trades and easy communication are enormous.
For one thing, an economic coordination of the Levantine States can negotiate better deals with the bordering larger States by constituting a larger common market that may ease up the frequent tensions and anxiety that the people have been experiencing a century ago since the colonial powers did their best to divide our social fabrics.
A few guidelines may go a long way toward a project of common market.
First, it is inevitable that all borders among the Near East States be definitely demarcated, resolved, and registered in the United Nation. This first step will eliminate foreign interventions in our internal affairs and appease unfounded fears of forced or implicit annexation.
Second, The Levant Union States (LUS) should drop all territorial claims with the neighboring States (except with Israel) that do not agree with the UN drawings.
Third, the LUS needs to institute a restricted Parliament that deal with the most urgent laws applicable to the union. The prime areas for legislations are: Water resources, agriculture and industrial production coordination, financial coordination, infrastructure, education, military, and energy resources.
Fourth, the establishment of a unified internal currency for internal trades among the States and leaving the States independent national currencies for external trades. Thus, the central banks in each State will set aside reserves for the internal united currency to cover up any internal difficulties for conversion into particular “national” currencies as the internal market expand.
Fifth: The institution of a central bank for managing and administering the internal currency to satisfy the growing internal trade.
Sixth, establishment of standards for armed forces and internal forces in the eventual coordination for securing the borders of the LUS.
Seventh, establishment of standards for public schooling systems in order to facilitate transfers of students among the States. It is essential that uniformed textbooks in geography of the region, its common history, and the various civic educational systems be introduced to all citizens.
Eight, establishing “Free trade zones” with neighboring States. For example, one in Iskandaron (Alexandretta) between Turkey and Syria on the coast, one at the junction among Turkey, Iraq, and Syria (in the Kurdish populated zone), one between Syria and Iraq in the desert region on the Euphrates River, one among Jordan, Syria and Iraq, one in Gaza between Egypt and Palestine, and one in Aqaba between Jordan and Saudi-Arabia.
Nine: Having coordinated foreign political positions with respect to the UN assembly.
Tenth, setting up a high political command in charge of negotiating any peace treaty with Israel as a Union of common interests. The piece meal negotiation process with this antiquated vassal mentalities is not going to insure any lasting peace.
Note: This post is an ongoing process and will be frequently edited for more details. Your focused comments will enrich the re-editing process.
Adonis Diaries 
Leave a Reply