Archive for September 1st, 2020
This town of traditional pottery in Lebanon: Beit Chabab
Last potter in Beit Chabab?
Who is Fawzi Fakhoury?
BEIT CHABAB, Lebanon: Fawzi Fakhoury hands are calloused and brown. Hours of shaping tough clay and standing in front of a burning wood oven have stained them shades darker than the rest of his body and toughened them so they are like leather.
He is rather short, with salt and pepper hair and bushy eyebrows, and dressed in simple, mud-stained clothes.
His weathered hands stand testimony to the thousands of pots he has created for the better part of his life.
I have posted many articles on Lebanon, and Michelle Ghoussoub has this latest.
Michelle Ghoussoub published in The Daily Star, this June 20, 2013: “Meet the last potter in Beit Shabab”
Fakhoury is the last working potter in Beit Shabab.
Fakhoury, left, works with his brother Assad, who helps out occasionally in the shop. (The Daily Star/Mohammad Azakir)
The scenic village is nestled in Lebanon’s mountains just outside of Beirut.
Sixty years ago, dozens of Beit Shabab families produced traditional pottery, and the heat from 40 burning ovens could be felt on the streets during the summer, Fawzi explains.
The town’s name was synonymous with pottery, and people came from around the country to purchase the artisanal clay pots, used for storing everything from arak to grains, olive oil and wine.
Now, he is the only one left.
Fakhoury’s workshop resembles a hermit’s cave.
Though dark and dusty, it remains well used and loved. Perched precariously on the edge of a small but steep ravine, Fakhoury working space has a crumbling old stone facade nestled into the mountain itself.
An elegant stone archway frames the entrance, with rusted scrap metal and broken pieces of mortar piled on top to prevent rainwater from flooding the small room. Bits and pieces of fragmented pots are piled haphazardly in a back corner.
A traditional stove, or babour, Arabic for kerosene burner, commands the center of the room. It doubles as the only heat source during the winter months, as nighttime temperatures can drop below freezing.
An old television set crackles in the background, the colors and shapes on the screen disfigured by poor reception. A fine, white film of dust covers every surface, and it puffs out of antique pillows on the faded couch when it is sat upon.
No one knows or remembers exactly how long the workshop has been running.
Fakhoury believes the family folklore and says that Roman potters trained his forefathers when they came to construct the ancient, colonnaded citadel of Baalbek in Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley around 300 B.C.
When the Romans left, his ancestors searched for the purest clay in the country, and eventually settled in Beit Shabab to be close to the best natural source: a small and muddy lake in the forest beneath the village (the mawsel).
Fakhoury’s creased wrinkles deepen and his brown face cracks into a crooked smile as he recalls a childhood of running among the clay pots. He’s worked as a potter for 60 years. His father, grandfather, great-grandfather, and great-great-grandfather all worked in this same space before him.
At no moment in his life did Fakhoury, now 66, wish for an alternative career path. He loves this job, he says.
Years of hard labor have given him a worn appearance and demeanor, but they have also kept him strong and tough. Toiling in the workshop where he was raised, he cuts the figure of a surviving Chinese terra-cotta warrior, stained by the mud that has defined his livelihood for half a century.
Fakhoury left the village temporarily during the Lebanese Civil War and worked in trade in West Africa. He always dreamt of returning to his workshop to continue his family’s legacy.
“I lived there, but I dreamed in Lebanon,” he says with a smile.
Fakhoury returned to find a wall of the workshop blown out by a bomb, but his tools intact. He wasted no time in repairing the room and reopening his business.
His wife and he have three daughters, all of whom are married and have long since left the house. Women don’t do pottery, he says, at least in Beit Shabab.
His face falls, however, when he reveals that he has no heir to continue Beit Shabab’s trademark industry when he retires.
“This workshop has been running for hundreds, maybe thousands of years, and when I go, it may all have been for nothing,” he lamented, looking wistfully around the chamber.
Though customers used to flock from across the country to hand pick his pots, the advent of plastic containers has slashed demand massively.
Nowadays, customers are often decorators seeking a rustic look, or tourists looking for authentic Lebanese craftsmanship.
He still ships a couple of hundred pots every year to a Jordanian arak producer, who uses them to store the anise-flavored liquor.
Producing pottery is like cultivating a crop, he muses. The clay is collected in the spring when it has the right consistency, then handspun into pots using a potter’s wheel.
The kiln, an oven designed especially for pottery, is fired up in August, the hottest month of the year, to accelerate the baking.
During these scorching weeks, Fakhoury stays up throughout the night to monitor the ovens and rotate the pots, making sure that months of intensive craftsmanship and exertion do not go up in flames.
The work is hard, and the fruit of his arduous labor much less plentiful than it once was. While his father would light the oven seven or eight times in one summer, he now only produces one batch of pots a year.
A pottery festival and exhibition in Normandy, France, once invited Fakhoury to learn different pottery techniques.
He says it was an honor to be recognized, but that he found himself underwhelmed by the developed industrial techniques of French potters. Having made thousands of pots in his life, he says he prefers to stick to what his father and grandfather taught him as a child.
Nassar Fakhoury, Fawzi’s neighbor and former landlord, shares his surname but is not sure exactly how they are related. Family lineages and histories go so far back in the village that they are sometimes impossible to keep track of or untangle.
“Fawzi is a part of this village in the same way that these streets are. He’s always in his workshop and his family has always been there. The children call him ‘the pottery man.’ There’s just no other way to describe him,” Nassar says.
When asked what has changed about the business since he began over half a century ago, Fawzi’s answer is simple: “Nothing. I still do business the way my father and grandfather did.”
It’s a legacy that may end without an apprentice or heir devoted to following in his forefathers’ footsteps.
It is almost impossible to picture the village without its main attraction, and for now, Fakhoury will continue to fill that role. He says he cannot imagine himself anywhere else.
“My grandfather and father died here, and one day, I will join them,” he says. “What I want is to die here.”
Note 1: In my childhood, I visited and was acquainted with three families of potters in the lower part of Beit-Chabab. The entire family members participated in the production, especially in summer time. Traditional pottery is vanishing quickly in Lebanon, and not even replaced by mass production facilities. There are is few potters in Rashaya Fokhar, and are closing shop for no family members replacing the older ones.
Note 2: A couple centuries ago, pottery was started in the upper quarters of Beit Chabab, but the clay was whitish. The potters in the lower part of Beit Chabab had the reddish and better clay to use, and they supplanted the upper families in that art and industry.
Note 3: A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Daily Star on June 20, 2013, on page 2.
Read more: http://www.dailystar.com.lb/Culture/Lifestyle/2013/Jun-20/220923-meet-the-last-potter-in-beit-shabab.ashx#ixzz2WpopbDU6 (The Daily Star :: Lebanon News :: http://www.dailystar.com.lb)
Gift of Doubt? Power of failure?
Posted by: adonis49 on: September 1, 2020
Gift of Doubt? Power of failure?
People don’t seek out challenges “They are apt to take on and plunge into new tasks because of the erroneously presumed absence of a challenge—because the task looks easier and more manageable than it will turn out to be.”
Albert O. Hirschman and the power of failure.
In the mid-nineteenth century, work began on a crucial section of the railway line connecting Boston to the Hudson River.
The addition would run from Greenfield, Massachusetts, to Troy, New York, and it required tunneling through Hoosac Mountain, a nearly 5-mile impediment, that blocked passage between the Deerfield Valley and a tributary of the Hudson.
James Hayward, one of New England’s leading railroad engineers, estimated that penetrating the Hoosac would cost, at most, a very manageable $2 million.
The president of Amherst College, an accomplished geologist, said that the mountain was composed of soft rock and that tunneling would be fairly easy once the engineers had breached the surface.
“The Hoosac . . . is believed to be the only barrier between Boston and the Pacific,” the project’s promoter, Alvah Crocker, declared.
Everyone was wrong. Digging through the Hoosac turned out to be a nightmare. The project cost more than ten times the budgeted estimate.
If the people involved had known the true nature of the challenges they faced, they would never have funded the Troy-Greenfield railroad.
Had they not, the factories of northwestern Massachusetts wouldn’t have been able to ship their goods so easily to the expanding West, the cost of freight would have remained stubbornly high, and the State of Massachusetts would have been immeasurably poorer.
So is ignorance an impediment to progress or a precondition for it?
The economist Albert O. Hirschman, who died last December, loved paradoxes like this.
He was a “planner,” the kind of economist who conceives of grand infrastructure projects and bold schemes. But his eye was drawn to the many ways in which plans did not turn out the way they were supposed to—to unintended consequences and perverse outcomes and the puzzling fact that the shortest line between two points is often a dead end.

“The Principle of the Hiding Hand,” one of Hirschman many memorable essays, drew on an account of the Troy-Greenfield “folly,” and then presented an even more elaborate series of paradoxes. Hirschman had studied the enormous Karnaphuli Paper Mills, in what was then East Pakistan.
The mill was built to exploit the vast bamboo forests of the Chittagong Hill Tracts. But not long after the mill came online, the bamboo unexpectedly flowered and then died, a phenomenon now known to recur every 50 years or so. Dead bamboo was useless for pulping; it fell apart as it was floated down the river.
Because of ignorance and bad planning, a new, multimillion-dollar industrial plant was suddenly without the raw material it needed to function.
But what impressed Hirschman was the response to the crisis.
The mill’s operators quickly found ways to bring in bamboo from villages throughout East Pakistan, building a new supply chain using the country’s many waterways.
They started a research program to find faster-growing species of bamboo to replace the dead forests, and planted an experimental tract. They found other kinds of lumber that worked just as well. The result was that the plant was blessed with a far more diversified base of raw materials than had ever been imagined.
If bad planning hadn’t led to the crisis at the Karnaphuli plant, the mill’s operators would never have been forced to be creative. And the plant would not have been nearly as valuable as it became.
“We may be dealing here with a general principle of action,” Hirschman wrote:
Creativity always comes as a surprise to us; therefore we can never count on it and we dare not believe in it until it has happened. We would not consciously engage upon tasks whose success clearly requires that creativity be forthcoming.
Hence, the only way in which we can bring our creative resources fully into play is by misjudging the nature of the task, by presenting it to ourselves as more routine, simple, undemanding of genuine creativity than it will turn out to be.
Malcolm Gladwell published in The New Yorker this June 24, 2013