I don’t think: I suspect.
Posted by: adonis49 on: October 19, 2020
I don’t reflect: I am Haunted
Adult have no idea how they managed to learn anything in childhood.
And yet, they barely apply the best ways to learn and understand, the ways kids learn.
Fiction or the real false stories and events precedes our comprehension of reality: Fiction stories allow us to access reality.
Even the literary genres labelled “real stories” or autobiography are mostly fiction and the protagonists must have said: “What? In my wildest imagination I never contemplated that this will happen to me...”
Sleep dreams might have the job of “recomputing” the default values in your world vision.
Reading different literary genres preempt you to understand reality, and accept that you are a potential “Statistics”, a term that drives people to the wall and make them furious “What? Am I not that special?”
But it is writing, drawing, painting, composing, playing musical instruments… that restructure and fine-tune your world view.
Acts that don’t involve the fingers to record the acts are Not registered properly in the brain archives.
Children doodle and draw before they they learn to write.
They listen to stories, memorize stories and write characters before they learn to read.
The world vision of children is etched in graphics and colors before content in books are appreciated.
What we assimilated in artistic vision reflects the way we see nature. The more artistic our mind is developed the more structured and complex our vision of nature are.
Otherwise, nature and the environment are a bundle of colors and shapes left for the subconscious to navigate us through.
Art is never imitating nature: The artist is representing what he is looking at inside his world vision.
The mind first “see” before the eyes register what the mind has seen.
We see how our accumulated world view see the world, nature and reality
And yet, we have no idea what is our world view. We might fathom what we “see” through observing and analyzing our actions and behaviors.
The content in articles, of political and scientific nature, is essential to get engaged with eyes wide open, assuming that the context has been clearly developed.
Without context, articles can be classified as “general”, regardless of how much you develop on the opinion and fake to provide details.
An opinion not backed by the context, even personal experience, is not worth publishing.
An opinion devoid of context smack of ignorance and the regurgitation of what the “common literature” is disseminated.
In all other topics, it is the form of the written style that grabs me most.
A single sentence can open up deeply hidden emotions that an entire volume will fail to do.
After all, everything has been said, if we can read in many languages (old and new) and read enough to last several life times.
I find myself furiously editing repost of articles so that the form matches my own style. I even edit “quotations” to suit my writing style. Why?
Eventually, I might have to re-read what I have posted, and I want to enjoy what I’m reading.
For example, I loath the journalistic style of splitting a quotation in order to insert “He said”, “sic”,”the author resumed”…
The sentence should flow smoothly to convey the emotion of the quoted person. Any insertion is a rational gimmick to preserve a semblance of objectivity, authenticity, neutrality…
I have no qualm in editing what the other have published, and the heck of what they say, and how their frustrated ego is mishandled… as long as the reader can access the original text and can do his due diligence…
Very often I read “I don’t know”, “I’m not sure”… And I wonder: these expressions are excellent in verbal conversations, but they don’t fit in the written text.
Make sure you know before addressing your reader, otherwise, keep your opinions in your notebook until they germinate into a viable position…
Send me a valid post within context in the preamble or in an after-note, and I’ll repost it: The audience of readers is varied and with multiple interests
Leave a Reply