Archive for May 12th, 2021
- In: cities/geography | death/ terminally ill/ massacres, genocide | Diaries | economy/finance | Essays | Events/Cultural/Educational/Arts | Jews/Israel/Palestine | Lebanon/Middle East/Near East/Levant | professional articles | religion/history | social articles | Time for Outrage | Uncategorized
- Leave a Comment
Lebanon and Palestine: Same and Different(Part 1)
Posted on April 29, 2009
- In: Book Review | cities/geography | Essays | Jews/Jewish/Israel | Lebanon/Middle East/Near East/Levant | Near-East Mediterranean civilization | religion/history | social articles
Brief ancient history:
Lebanon is a recognized State by the UN in 1943. The Lebanese State got its fictitious “independence” from France who withdrew its troops in 1946 (2 years before the State of Israel was recognized by the UN).
Palestine was partitioned in 1947 between Palestinians and the minority Jews (barely 40% but allocated 55% of the land of Palestine).
Currently, all of Palestine is under occupation by this Zionist State called Israel.
Lebanon and Palestine were throughout antiquity under the domination of neighboring Empires such as in Egypt, Turkey, Iran, and Iraq (Mesopotamia).
The people in the two tiny stretches of coastal lands on the Eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea were mainly mariners, traders, middlemen among Empires, and skilled artisans. (They were united under the Seleucid dynasty, an officer of Alexander army)
Under the nominal or explicit domination of Empires, Lebanon and Palestine had autonomous administration of their society as City-States that were highly democratic within the city limits as Athens emulated in the 7th century BC.
The famous City-States from north to south are Ugarite, Tripoli, Jubail (Byblos), Saida, Sour (Tyr), Akka (Acre and Haifa), and Askelan.
The City-State of Jubail (inventors of the alphabet) built Saida; Saida built Sour and dominated the sea routes; and Sour built Akka and relayed Saida in sea domination and expanding the trading posts to Spain.
These City-States were the masters of the sea and traded with all Empires, and build trading towns: they have resisted many overwhelming sieges, sometimes for years, and occasionally managed Not to be entered and devastated.
Every empire that conquered Syria resumed its drive by dominating Lebanon and Palestine.
In general, when more than one empire co-existed at the same period and when the empire in Egypt was powerful enough then it governed the southern half of Palestine while the other empire governed the upper half, including Lebanon.
The strip of Gaza to Yafa was mostly under Egyptian cultural influence.
The coastal strip from north actual Syria to the Sinai was called Canaan. Then, the upper stretch to Akka was called Phoenicia or even Saida (in reference for the main City-State).
The Sea People, called Philistines and probably coming from the Adriatic Sea, destroyed Greece fleet, devastated many coastal cities, and conquered Egypt before they were driven out and settle in Gaza and the southern part of Canaan, called Palestine ever since.
Moses (this mythical story) arrived with an amalgam of nomadic tribes and his successors attempted to occupy part of south Palestine. These tribes worshiped Yahweh/Yahwa, thus, yahoud and Jews for the Latin people.
These tribes under Moses reverted to worshiping the all encompassing God of the Land called El., except a few tribes such as Judea and Benjamin. During the Roman Empire, and most of the empires that dominated Syria, the district of Tyr administered the upper half of Palestine, including Galilee.
Modern History:
In the beginning of the 20th century, the military in Turkey deposed the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire and started policies focused on Turk Nationhood. Many in Lebanon, Syria, and Palestine immigrated to Egypt.
During the First World War famine fell on Lebanon along with a devastating wave of locust; they immigrated to the USA, Brazil, Latin America, and many were dropped in Africa by unethical ship captains who claimed that they reached the Americas.
After the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in the First World War, Britain had mandate over Palestine and Iraq; France had mandate over Lebanon and Syria.
Consequently, the bilingual Palestinians spoke English, and their counterpart in Lebanon spoke French.
In 1930, Haifa grabbed the center of trades and many Lebanese flocked to Haifa and Palestine. The reverse wave occurred when the State of Israel was recognized by a majority of one vote at the UN in 1948. Lebanon received Palestinian refugees who were installed in camps on the ground that their stay is temporary! and will return under the UN resolution 194
In one chapter of “World Adrift” Amine Maaluf said “The western powers are now paying the price for failing to apply their values in the colonies”
The European colonial powers of Britain, France, Germany, and the Netherlands had no intentions of spreading their moral values to those they considered Not worthy of their pearls and gems.
The indigents were to be enslaved, exploited, and humiliated;
The indigents who adopted the western values of equality, liberty, and democracy were persecuted and harassed and imprisoned;
The colonial administrators negotiated with the conservative conformists who were ready to strike deals and cohabit with lesser human rights.
Dictators in Europe maybe abhorred after their defeat, but the colonial powers readily accept dictators in underdeveloped States to facilitate the embezzling businesses.
Human values had different quality and flavors according to the whims and interest of the exploiting colonial powers.
Britain used astute diplomatic policies to subjugate their colonies more frequently than France did; but France of the French Revolution had No patience negotiating and communicating with their colonial people and never skipped an occasion to stat its true purpose for domination.and exhibiting arrogant military posturing.
The colonial powers installed infrastructures that were appropriate for exploitation of the colonies; they established the required administrations for smooth and efficient exploitation.
The other administrative offices for legislation and justices were carbon copies of the ones in their homeland, but these codes could be disposed off and trampled at the first occasion that short sighted interest called for swift and immediate actions.
Contemporary history:
Current Lebanon was created by France during its mandate period and cut out from Syria; it is now a recognized State by the UN since 1943. Palestine was divided but the Zionist movement conquered the allocated portion for the Palestinians by the UN in 1948. through a detailed pre-planned attack drawn in 1935.
The Palestinians are now located in the West Bank of the Jordan River and in Gaza where Israel has built 150 Jewish-only colonies and increasing every year.
The Palestinians who fled their towns and villages in the State of Israel are refugees in Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria. And they spread throughout the 5 continents. The UN resolution 193 demands the repatriation of these Palestinians to their hometowns but Israel has been rebuffing that resolution since 1948.
Lebanon suffered many civil wars and calamities for Not being capable or unwilling of absorbing the Palestinian refugees.
Israel has waged four devastating wars against the State of Lebanon on flimsy pretexts based on the Palestinian resistance trying to regain their rights for a homeland.
And three more pre-emptive wars against after the withdrawal of the PLO in 1982.
Note: More detailed facts of the daily business trades between Lebanon and Palestine in Part 2. The implantation of Israel was mainly meant to break down daily trades, and One market, and prevent daily communication among the One people in One Nation: Syria.
A Way out of History for immigrants? What about the geography and customs?
Posted by: adonis49 on: May 12, 2021
Are you an immigrant? Do I want to forget my “history”?
Posted on July 3, 2010 (Written in May 7, 2009)
The citizens of the developed Nations (mostly the colonial powers), within their own boundaries, feel that they have no longer any need to learn history, especially their own history. (But the atrocities levied on the people of the “colonized” will keep reminding them that their history was effectively Evil)
History to the citizens of the developed nations is a drag, a waste of time, of no use, totally irrelevant. They are mostly correct in their feeling and appreciation of the uselessness of history relevant to their nation.
Why is this feeling?
First, they have reached a level of social cohesion, awareness, appreciation of human dignity and human rights that reduce historical accounts of injustices (and exploitation of the “citizens” in mines for many generations) as redundant stories.
Second, they are more concerned about their present state of affairs such as maintaining their current level of comfort, consumerism choices, creating diverse opportunities, future availabilities for their desires and wishes.
These modern citizens have institutions to continue the good work; institutions to analyze whatever history is appropriate for the nation, institutions for research, for legitimacy, for governance, for economy, for finance, for strategic studies, for learning, for art, for marketing, and for studying the underdeveloped States and minorities.
History for the citizens of the developed nation is plainly relegated to the under-developed States.
The Third World and Fourth World “citizens”, (we should create another term for citizenship for the underdeveloped world because it is frankly too pompous and inappropriate any which way you define a citizen), have nothing left but “history” for amusement and to give them reference to an illusory identity.
History for the “history citizens” has been written by the vanquisher and then translated and interpreted by the colonial powers.
The archeological sites in the land of the “amused archaic citizens” were dug out and investigated by the colonial powers and the artifacts were dusted off, cleaned, and conserved in secured museums that the traveling tourists and immigrants never visit.
The chasm between the developed and the “non-developed” States is huge and growing larger by the day.
History is still being taught in the developed nations simply because more immigrants are flocking in and some sort of integration is commendable.
More likely, a citizen would visit an immigrant friend to fill him in on current news, and occasionally, getting a good laugh on stories of their respective ancestors.
Yes, the immigrant might know more details on the developed citizen’s ancestors and the history of this citizen’s country.
In fact, hard copy dailies are published to satisfy the voracious curiosities of the immigrants. Storytelling is a cultural trademark among immigrants: Usually, getting together is worthless and devoid of any interest if No bickering accompanies the assembly of immigrants.
If there are rival “civilizations” it must be in the mind of the immigrants: They are attuned to any gesture, tone of voice, slang, or posturing that remind them of their “indignity”, their frequent humiliations, their total dependence on the host nation for understanding, leniency, forgiveness, compassion, and equal treatments under the laws.
The immigrants are overachiever, hard-working, on constant alert of changes in behavior and special laws, on foreign policies regarding their “homeland”, on unequal measures doled in foreign policies and moral values.
“Civilization clash” is in the mind of the immigrant: the “developed” citizen doesn’t care about the agony and tribulation of his immigrant friend.
The immigrant is a sponge for all kinds of curiosities in art, theater, intellectual life, and any association that invites him to participate.
The immigrant is most likely polyglot and can converse in many languages and he has to suffer being mocked for his accent in the local slang; he has to be corrected frequently because accent is the main avenue for integration and acceptance as a civilized individual.
Discrimination is in the mind of the immigrant: A citizen would immediately recognize an immigrant for miles if he cared to focus a second on the individual.
The citizen in an administrative position has to call upon the cleric, the community leader, or the father of the immigrant before taking any decision for any kinds of permit application.
The immigrant is supposed to be looked after as an immature kid no matter how old he is. Equal treatments are the domain of the citizens and interpretations of the law and customs are appropriate when dealing with an immigrant.
The whole gamut of the UN laws for human rights were targeted for the under-developed States that are shaming human kinds in their state of affairs.
Yet, many “non-citizens” would like to experience a new era when embargoes on military hardware, military trainers, and military experts are imposed on dictators, juntas, and oligarchies who are flaunting the UN human rights declarations in their underdeveloped States.
Learning seriously the language of your immigrant friend is the first sign of real friendship.
Blatantly observing the differences in culture and customs is an excellent sign of friendship. Vigorously and unabashedly critiquing divergence in opinions is sign of friendship.
Make no mistake: Any behavior that smack of covert apartheid is quickly sensed by your immigrant “friend”.
Make no mistake: the next generation of your immigrant friend will be exactly you, when you were younger. If you are serious for integration of your immigrant friend , then behave as if you are dealing with the next generation, on a par.