##
Archive for **May 20th, 2022**

### Many kinds of Forces: and now Nuclear Strong Force? Explaining subatomic nuclear forces… carried by water…

Posted May 20, 2022

on:**Hydrophilia**?** Losing two Oxygen atoms (by mass) in the water molecule.**

* Hypersigmanometry*?

**M-sigma**relationship?

**?**

*caraboba*cycle*Beaucalus*?

How all the above terms** describe the creation of life**?

**Note**: Just increasing the dose of **complexity**? Never mind, it could be fun, in the long term.

# Predicting the Nuclear Strong Force: Hydrophilia *𝜑*

Feb 24, 2022

*This article was originally published on ResearchGate*.

Further explanation in my future new book, *The Singularity of Electromagnetics — Early Fundamentals of Beaucalus*.

I’ve published about it on **ResearchGate** (here), and I’m using this Medium article to explain the concept of * hydrophilia force *and other –

**philic chemical affinities**.

Let’s first think of *hydrophilia* that means

“we subtract mass from the force (*hydrophilia constant*) of the △ of 777 moles of H2O (6998.78088) divided by the △_{h2o} (16.12603206), all of that divided by the root-division of △_{h2o} from ◯_{c² joule}, equals 38.56324325 Newtons.”

Follow the * Hypersigmanometry* below.

**Our hydrophilic force is 38.56324325 Newtons.**

We postulate that losing two Oxygen atoms (by mass) results in the *hydrophilia*, and when we try to describe what *hydrophilia *means, we can form Calculus symbols, as following:

The proof above suggest that *hydrophilia* is an m-sigma relationship. Wikipedia says (about m-sigma),

“The

M–sigma(or)M–σrelationis an empirical correlation between the stellar velocity dispersionσof a galaxy bulge and the mass M of the supermassive black hole at its center.The

M–σrelation was first presented in 1999 during a conference at the Institut d’astrophysique de Paris in France.The proposed form of the relation, which was called the

‘Faber–Jackson law for black holes’”

The m-sigma relationship to velocity dispersion agrees with my other theory about relative space, and no time or time as a constant.

The m-sigma relationship in that race to ‘X’ [from the last linked article] shows a dispersion in velocity.

But further interpretation says that the *hydrophilia*, as derived by subtracting m from F (in F=ma), forms *hydrophilia *as a **deceleration subtraction**.

This is all in the case of *hydrophilic forces 𝜑*.

At our current period, we form atomic based upon the Carbon atom; for instance, if we lose our *hydrophilia *(from 2 Oxygens reducing), losing water, **we’d transmute into Boron** (as below).

We can also investigate into the formation of our **mitochondrial DNA,** as below:

From here, we get a good **frequency number, 12.1225465**; where the 12 whole units may be represented by one Carbon atom, and the remainder of 0.1225465 may be represented as a **distributed frequency** of* Hydrogenic* atomics, or in *helio-tomics*, [12.1225465] / [3•1.00794] = 4.009017236 He [amu].

As when taking 0.1225465 and dividing it by 1.00794, it stays 0.12 for a ** caraboba cycle** (three-turns/division-cycles) so that magnifying it by one resolute octave, we form a whole other Carbon atom,

**otherwise described to as the creation of life.**

In any case, the above Calculus should be a good formula for the formation of our **cellular work-engine**, the mitochondria.

That is, it should be described as a process which births mitochondrial DNA from two slightly **differentiated dipolar clocks of water molecule**s, drying up, oxidizing — losing one hydrogen atom; and this, is the formula for the birth of our mitochondrial genes.

Of course, it is best that I am thorough with the understanding of *hydrogenics, *and the formulae, that I hope to move forth in-with this writing; that is, we should also be interpreting the *hydrophilia* of two Carbon atoms fusing molecular structures.

That follows by, taking the *hydrophilic constant*, then subtracting two Carbon atoms (as similar to what we performed with Oxygen, earlier), which equals: 14.54124325 — giving us the *hydrophilia of (2C:H1872629/1000) *of two Carbon atoms.

With this *hydrophilia of 2C:H1872629/1000 (*14.54124325), let’s mathematically simulate how that hydrophilia forms mitochondrial DNA (C1H6) [with the following Calculus below].

We get a 99.32590396% scientific significance for our *hydrophilia force *calculations.

But with better clarity, we start by taking the *hydrophilic 2C:H1872629/1000 hydrophilia *of 14.54124325 and divide it by 6 hydrogen atoms [from C1H6], run that process of division through the magnitude of our Dewey decimal number scale, then find *Carbon-affinity (carbophilia) *by denominating the result from the [14.54124325 • 10] / [6 • 1.00794] by 12.011, giving us a: *2 α-particles 1872629 milli-β particles*, a hydrocarbon-affinity of: C2H0.001872629.

The last bit of exponential Calculus is how we determined our **scientific significance for our hydrophilia 𝜑 force calculations.**

Furthering the *Beaucalus* discoveries of *hydrophilia* *𝜑* with **natural nitrogen**, forming ammonia and o-zone pollution, we can use the below *Beaucalus* to predict annihilations of anti-Oxygen and Oxygen atoms — synchronized fusions, as part of a *hydrophilic 2N:6H* *hydrophila*, where the remaining *hydrophilia* may form an 6-sided atom, as in Carbon, and form frequency wavelengths of *carbo-philia — *in the suspension/separation of natural nitrogen from three natural hydrogen atoms, undoing **ammonia**;

we may form.

May we extend our *hydrophilia 𝜑 force *model to more complex chemical compositions like insulin (C257H383N65O77S6)? We can try. Let’s start by trying to figure out what sort of *hydrophilia *the hydrogen atoms and the oxygen atoms in the chemical formula for insulin possesses (below):

Then, let’s multiply our F*𝜑H383O77+ hydrophilia force* with each of the remaining atomic arrangements (in insulin): C257, N65, and S6, as below.

The last line is a contrasting square root operation of the sulfuric 6S:*H4+ hydrophilia *(in insulin) [-182.2760322] after 3076.629932 angles of division, starting with Carbon absorption, and denominating that Carbon absorption by 900.3181322 angles of nitrogen division(s).

The result suggests a good approximation for* hydrophilia* **in insulin** (since it is close to 1.0).

# So What is Hydrophilia and Hydrophilic Forces?

My hypothesis is that it **explains subatomic nuclear forces**.

As *hydrophilia *refers to a particle’s **dependence upon water**; and *hydrophilic 𝜑 forces *are what carries the *hydrophilia *through **energy conversion by General Relativity** — that is, that the curvature of the space fabric, leads to a force being formed —

**carried by water**.

*If you liked this article, please hit the ‘Applause’ button below*. *Or, alternatively, hit subscribe to get the latest articles from me, or perhaps, you’d like to leave a comment — which I promise to try my best to reply.*

**Youth is irreversible.**

If you hope,

If your kind of Faith says that most everything, save youth,

With a little good health, is reversible…

You have No reason

Not to daydream of a better tomorrow.

Go ahead

And raise vigorous and healthy children

**Note**: A fitting title could be “**Faked Optimism**“