Adonis Diaries

Posts Tagged ‘American University of Beirut

Dignity? Bkhsūs el-karāmeh in the Arab World

The Center for Arab and Middle Eastern Studies (CAMES) at American University of Beirut invited Sami Hermez to give a lecture on Jan. 30, 2014 on the topic of

Understanding Dignity in Political Struggle in Lebanon and Beyond

And “On Why People Kill: On the Perpetrators of Political Violence

Freedom, dignity and social justice have been the basic demands of the revolutions that swept the Arab world since 2011.

This lecture is to explore one of these demands: karameh or dignity.

People have been screaming this across the region, and calling for a return of dignity by seizing it from the state.  What happens when we take dignity as an analytical category to think through political mobilization?

And what can anthropology tell us about the micro-workings of dignity (its everyday practices, embodiment and emotions) in political struggle?

By focusing on the context of Lebanon, the first question is the use of honor as a trope by which to look at political engagements within the modern state system, and instead ask that we more closely explore dignity as a structure of political emotion that gives people and their lives meaning and power.

Second, through ethnographic fieldwork that looked at how people in Lebanon live everyday with instability and a coming war, it is  shown how dignity becomes contested and conflicted in times of instability, and consider the way people use this notion in their political struggles.

Note:  Sami Hermez is a Visiting Scholar in the Department of Anthropology at Harvard University.

He has taught at University of Pittsburgh and Mt. Holyoke College, and was Postdoctoral fellow at the Centre for Lebanese Studies, St. Antony’s College, Oxford University.

He holds a PhD in Anthropology from Princeton University (2011). He has published in PoLar (2012), Cultural Dynamics (2010), and Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism (2011).

Dr. Hermez is a candidate for the CAMES position in Middle East Studies with a focus on the contemporary Arab world.

Collapsiblele Bicycle: Cyclopse Not to fold under you… and Bike Generation

What is it?

Cyclopse is a collapsible bicycle. A clean, compact, lightweight urban mobility solution we developed this past year. It takes you around your city efficiently and in style while giving you a minimum amount of exercise. It’s intuitively collapsible, sustainable and is designed in a way that empowers commuters to get to their destinations: office, school, university even restaurants an outings in a fun and efficient way without taking up a lot of storage space.

Nour Sobh, civil engineer from the American University of Beirut, and Nabil Tabesh, craftsman with more than 20 years of experience in craft production, posted: Cyclopse: Collapsible Bicycle (cyclopse.henri@gmail.com)


Key Specs

  • Sustainable/Clean – Made from recyclable plastic material in addition to aluminum alloy.
  • Compact – Easy to store when commuting, in office or when traveling in the trunk of a car.
  • Lightweight – Easy to carry on stairs or around buildings.
  • Low Step-Over Height – Easy to mount / dismount, especially for ladies in a skirt.
  • Innovative – Hub-less wheels, a reinvention of the bicycle’s archaic design.
  • Vintage – classic handlebars and seat
  • Easy to Maintain – Assembled with bolts and screws, without any welded components. Parts are easily replaced if damaged.
  • Grease Free – Driven by a grease-less rubber belt (no greasy chain, no dirty clothes!)
  • No License Required – Buy and ride with no delay or hassle.


Who are we?

Nour Sobh holds a civil engineering degree from the American University of Beirut whilst Nabil Tabesh is a craftsman with more than 20 years of experience in craft production.

We’re a couple of dreamers who want to change the way we commute in cities, particularly in Beirut where we both grew up and spent most of our lives. We want to provide an alternative to driving your car, and if you don’t have a car and use public transportation we thought maybe you should be able to commute without the hassle of the unstable public transportation system.

This project is more than just about producing a prototype. It’s part of my journey of self-exploration.

After a decade of designing crafts as a hobby, I left my corporate job to do things I’ve always wanted to do, one of which was producing this bike design particularly because it directly influences urban life. My aspirations partnered up with Nabil’s effort to make something out of nothing.

His passion is to build crafts from pure mechanics and away from electronics has been an age old one. He dedicates his efforts on this project to his bicycle-loving friend Henri whom he unfortunately lost a few years ago. The rise of the bicycling trend around Beirut was another factor of motivation towards the project. Calls for having pedestrians zones are springing out around the city and the Do It Yourself and entrepreneurship cultures are thriving, particularly Lamba Labs – Beirut’s Hackerspace in which I was involved with so I thought maybe the world does need a do it yourself bicycle?


Why?

Beirut is a relatively small city yet the capital and biggest in Lebanon. It’s heavily congested. The public transportation system is insufficient, non maintained and unreliable. The continuously soaring gas prices and the deficient job market prevent affording a car or a motorbike. The air and sound pollution storm the population every day.

Being late to everything became a fashion, and commuting is a stressful hassle. This project is an attempt to shape the future of commuting in Beirut, the Middle East and the world.


Where do you fit in?

Producing a testing model and prototyping a unique collapsible bicycle isn’t cheap. We’ve built a conceptual model and exhibited it in Beirut Design Week 2013 last June. But at this point we lack the raw material. Cyclopse has little to no conventional components that can be procured directly from the market, particularly the wheels, so there is a need to cast molds and build most of it from scratch.

By supporting our project you will be part of a movement for positive change in the way we get from home to work – helping to provide a seamless way to use public transportation and lessen our dependence on single occupant automobiles. As well as helping to radically change our lives that are partly occupied by long stressful waits in traffic jams and related delays. You will feel better, and more connected to your community by riding a bike, it provides a light workout, reduces stress, forces you to get fresh air and sun and therefore increases happiness.

This folding bike will empower you to widen your commuting options;Even if your distances are far, you can cover part of them through carpooling with friends or public transport, and the rest of your trips can be done by bike. The best part is that it’s foldable so compact, and light so you can take it almost anywhere.


Every Bit Helps!

So far, we’ve been funding ourselves but now we need your help, and every dollar counts! You can contribute to bettering transportation methods and being a part of our project. But if you believe in what we’re doing but can’t help us financially, you could spread the word tell your friends, Like and Share our Cyclopse page on Facebook, and tweet or blog freely about it as long as you let us know in the comments. Feel free to contact us for more details on: Email: cyclopse.henri@gmail.com or Facebook.


How will your contribution be used?

Our funding goal of $13,000 will allow us to have a prototype up and running. If we hit our goal, those who have pledged with be kept in constant communication until Cyclopse is done. Please follow our progress on Facebook and thank you for your consideration in supporting our project.

Campaign ends on: 26 Nov,2013

Special Thanks goes to our partners in crime: Moussa Shabandar for the filmography, Sara Takkoush for the graphics, George Tabatadze for the initial renders and the friends that encouraged us and pushed us to do this, you know who you are you awesome people.

Bike generation shared Green Wheals photo 

Christmas is in less than 2 months! And is there a better gift for a kid than a bike? Green Wheels is partnering up with Bike Generation and with you all to offer underprivileged kids a bike for Christmas. This is how it works : You can send the old bikes you don't know where to store at Bike Generation in Tahwita (tel : 01 398 442); Bike Generation will fix them (provided they are not a piece of ruin) and Green Wheels will coordinate with NGOs in various regions of the country to distribute them at Christmas to deprived kids regardless of religion or nationality. This is the first year we launch this programme and our objective is to reach 100 kids.<br /><br /><br />
We count on you all to make this programme a success that will bring a smile to the face of unlucky kids in this difficult time!
Christmas is in less than 2 months! And is there a better gift for a kid than a bike?
Green Wheels is partnering up with Bike Generation, and with you all, to offer underprivileged kids a bike for Christmas. This is how it works : You can send the old bikes you don’t know where to store at Bike Generation in Tahwita (tel : 01 398 442); Bike Generation will fix them (provided they are not a piece of ruin) and Green Wheels will coordinate with NGOs in various regions of the country to distribute them at Christmas to deprived kids regardless of religion or nationality.
This is the first year we launch this program and our objective is to reach 100 kids. We count on you all to make this program a success that will bring a smile to the face of unlucky kids in this difficult time!

Is Violence a Normal news in Lebanon? How much faith is about right?

Samples of TV channel and international newspaper sound bites: “Lebanon on the brink of…,” “Syrian conflict spilling into Lebanon,” “Unrest in fragile Lebanon concerns region”…

Michelle, a Canadian girl, attending her last university years at the American University of Beirut posted on Aug. 16 under “Lebanon and the normalization of violence”

“Here we go. The frustrating developments in Lebanon have driven me to write. Considering the fact that I’ve just moved here for a year to study and ideally jump-start my career as a journalist, this isn’t necessarily a bad thing. But I’d much rather be writing about social issues, the beauty of Beirut and my experiences as an international student than the lawlessness and chaos we witnessed yesterday.

Here’s the thing. I love Lebanon. But it’s becoming harder and harder to reconcile the romanticized Lebanon of my mind with what is increasingly flashing across every TV channel and international newspaper. “Lebanon on the brink,” “Syrian conflict spilling into Lebanon,” “Unrest in fragile Lebanon concerns region.”

Lebanese have been reading and largely scoffing at these alarmist titles for a better part of 15 years. But as easy as it is to tune out the news and dismiss the developments with a proverbial “welcome to Lebanon,” it is becoming increasingly discouraging to see the kind of people who appear to hold the power in this country. The kind of people who burn tires, block roads, kidnap at will and incite threats because they are well aware that a state trapped in sectarian gridlock, unable to maintain a crumbling infrastructure and too intimidated to take a stand in a tense region will not act against them.

Amazingly, violence is a social norm in Lebanon. The average Lebanese was perhaps slightly alarmed, but not majorly shocked by yesterday’s events.

Many Lebanese worry, but hoards of others will simply turn off the TV and tell you that in 3 days, all will be back to normal – whatever definition that word has taken on here. But the purpose of this post is not to despair.

Lebanese have proven themselves to be extremely resilient to conflict, and the thugs on the street do not represent the majority of Lebanese. It’s been a long hot summer, and it’s not over yet. But let’s have a little faith in Lebanon…though maybe too much faith is our problem. More to follow.

http://mghoussoub.wordpress.com/

Note 1: Michelle has been so immersed in the social life of Lebanon that she forgot to be specific about the terrible three-day violence that she mentioned. Probably, she is referring to the clashes in the city of Tripoli (Lebanon).

Note 2: https://adonis49.wordpress.com/2012/08/26/ideal-case-study-city-for-alienated-youth-tripoli-lebanon/

Feinberg PPH: Commencement Address given by Bechara Choucair, May 4, 2011

Dr. Bechara Choucair is Commissioner of public health of the city of Chicago.  I liked his Commencement Address at Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University and decided to publish it on wordpress.com.  This speech covered all the grounds and it is impressive.  I found it acceptable to edit out sentences that are not closely related to the subject matter in order to shorten the message.

“Today is about you. You decided to invest in your education. You decided to focus on public health. You worked hard. You read many articles. I am sure you wrote many papers. You participated in many work-groups. You sat for many exams. You gave many presentations. It is all paying off today. Congratulations.

My mom, dad, my sisters and my grandfather came along to my college graduation. I was so excited to have made it through College. At that time, I was accepted into Medical School at the American University of Beirut. I was really happy with the progress I made. My grandfather, who graduated from the same school 60 years earlier, gave me a big hug and said: “I could not be any more proud!” To this day, these are the words that come to mind anytime I think of him. He passed away a few years later. I am so glad I made him proud.

I have no doubt that many of your loved ones could not be any more proud today. To your loved ones: Thank You. Thank you for your support. Thank you for your love. And most importantly, thank you for being there.

As I reflect back on how my career has evolved, I can’t help but wonder if I would be here today if I did not work with Dr Hamadeh as my community medicine project mentor in my second year of medical school. Dr Hamadeh is a Family Physician with a Masters in Public Health. I worked closely with him and I realized that there is a lot more to Medicine than seeing patients. I saw the potential power that public health has, to truly make our population healthy. Every time I go back to Lebanon to visit with family, I make sure to stop by his office. I hope he knows how critical his role was, in shaping my career.

Today, I wanted to do 3 things:

  1. I will briefly describe the history of public health in Chicago
  2. I will talk about the intersection between public health and medicine
  3. I will tell you about the future of public health in Chicago

The population-based approach of public health has had a tremendous impact on the health of our communities for almost two hundred years.  In Chicago, the formal establishment of public health took place in 1834, when the Board of Health was established to fight the threat of cholera.

During this Early Sanitation era, sanitation and quarantine were our best tools for fighting disease. The first sanitation regulations were passed and required all men over 21 years old to help clean the city’s streets and alleys. We conducted home visits to persons with infectious diseases and boarded ships in Chicago’s harbor to check on the health of crewmen.   Our deepest public health roots can be traced to disease control.

[Slide 1]   Earliest public information efforts.

Starting in the 1850’s,efforts in the era of sanitary reform, focused heavily on sewers, water and food and dairy. During this period, the Health Department issued regulations governing the drainage and plumbing of new buildings (1889); we initiated meat inspections at Chicago’s Union Stock Yards (1869), and; full milk inspection activities began (1892).

We saw some of our highest death rates during this era due to diphtheria, typhoid and scarlet fevers, measles and whooping-cough. Using his regulatory authority, the health commissioner at the time, Dr Oscar Coleman De Wolf required the reporting of contagious diseases by physicians in 1877.

[Slide 2]   By 1887, our advancements in medical understanding helped us see that typhoid would continue to kill unless we stopped the flow of contaminated water into Lake Michigan–the source of the water we drank, the water we cooked with, and the water in which we bathed.  Building the 28-mile Sanitary and Ship Canal, which reversed the flow of the Chicago River by 1900, was a major medical/public health intervention.

With the advent of the Hygiene Movement (1880’s-1950’s), and continued advances in understanding disease and medical practice, the focus of public health shifted to individual hygiene and medical care, particularly children’s health.

In 1890, a Chicago child had only a 50% chance of reaching 5 years of age. By 1900, the odds of surviving to age 5 had increased to 75%.   In 1899, with the support of 73 physician volunteers, the City initiated its first campaign against infant mortality.

Service delivery focused on the provision of dental services in schools in 1915, public health nurse home visits to infants in 1925 and educational campaigns against venereal disease in 1922.   These remain among our priorities today.

[Slide 3]  Early public health nurses at work.

On the bottom is one of a group of nurses known as “finders of sick infants.” These nurses would seek out sick babies and refer them and their mothers to Tent Camps where they would receive medical treatment and hygiene education.

[Slide 4]These pictures are from 1956 when 516 persons were stricken with polio. Public health authorities assigned 90% of the city’s health workers to reach a goal of one million inoculations in 2 weeks. One year later, Chicago had only 28 cases, and in 1959 when the U.S. went through a record breaking year for polio, Chicago had only one case.

The 1950’s saw the beginning of dramatic growth in medical interventions which prompted the era of health care services. During this time, the delivery of personal health care services, primarily to low-income populations, was becoming the primary public identity of public health in Chicago.

In 1959, the Health Department opened the Mid-South Mental Health Center, the first of what would become a network of community mental health centers by the early 1970’s.

[Slide 5]The first half of the 1970’s also saw the development of several Department neighborhood health centers under the federal Model Cities Program. The first of our centers, in the Uptown community, was established in 1970. Here you can see our clinics in Lakeview and the 1987 groundbreaking for the expansion of our West Town clinic.

The 1960’s and 1970’s brought significant changes at the federal level as well. The passage of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965 greatly expanded access to care for some of our most vulnerable populations.

Since that time, CDPH has greatly expanded its capacity in Epidemiology, Policy, Planning, Resource Development, and more recently, Information Technology, while maintaining its efforts in critical public health functions such as disease prevention and control, and in the last decade, emergency preparedness.

We have a public health history to be proud of. From the early days of the sanitary reform era to running medical care facilities, I can’t be any prouder of our history as a City. We always invested in building a healthier and a safer Chicago.

The intersection between clinical medicine and public health. These two worlds are often seen separate. We often see them as different disciplinary silos in which many of us spend entire careers. Ted Schettler, the Science Director of the Science and Environmental Health Network, frames both disciplines with respect to focus, scale, ethics, education and the nature of the science.

Clinical medicine focuses primarily on the individual while public health focuses on the community. Relevant time frames in Clinical Medicine are usually single lifetimes, while public health thinks in terms of generations.

From an ethics perspective, clinicians advocate for individual people. Public health practitioners advocate for the community, for a group of people. In clinical medicine we focus on individual patient rights. In public health, we think about human rights, social justice, and environmental justice.

From an education perspective, in clinical medicine we focus on the biomedical model with more emphasis on cure than prevention (although this is shifting now). In public health, we learn more about sociology, epidemiology, cultural anthropology, economics and more.

Think for a moment about the evidence of the science. In clinical medicine we love to talk about controlled, double-blind clinical trials. We don’t find that type of approach often in public health.

Have you ever asked yourself where do you fit better? Have you ever seen yourself in one of the two worlds?

Clearly, there are differences: differences in focus, differences in scale, differences in ethics, differences in education and differences in the nature of science.

But the reality is that the health of the individual and the health of the community are inter-related and inter-dependent. Maintaining two disciplinary silos is NOT the answer. Bridging the gap is critical if we are serious about improving the quality of life of our residents.

Bridging the gap starts right here. It starts with education. We have to enhance the understanding of public health principles among our students in the clinical field and we have to enhance the understanding of clinical medicine principles among our public health students.

Bridging the gap happens in research. We have to expand our research portfolio to focus on health disparities and other population level research.

Bridging the gap will not be successful unless we translate what we learn in research all the way into public policy.

And finally, it is people like you, like the faculty here and like me, who will take the lead in bridging this gap. The good news is that here in Chicago, there are great people who have done great work in bridging this gap. I am forever grateful for their contributions.

At the Chicago Department of Public Health, we are exploring how to fully exploit the intersection of public health and medicine. We are excited about having the opportunity to use, as the foundation of such efforts, the proliferation of HIT initiatives, particularly in under served communities. A major federally-funded initiative to help us achieve this goal is CHITREC, housed here at Feinberg and funded through stimulus funds (American Recovery & Reinvestment Act).

CHITREC (Chicago Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center) provides technical assistance to primary care providers serving predominantly uninsured, under insured, and medically under served populations in developing an Electronic Health Records system that will improve health outcomes. CHITREC is collaboration between Northwestern University and the Alliance of Chicago Health Center Services, a health center-controlled network. It builds upon extensive collective Electronic Health Records implementation and clinical informatics experience.

We anticipate that as the participating providers come on-line, there will be wonderful opportunities to use the wealth of data available through an Electronic Health Record to measure population health and be able to pinpoint where particular interventions are needed to improve outcomes.

Other federal funding, including the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, has provided additional opportunities for investments in the electronic data infrastructure supporting population health. Your Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) is positioned to become a leader in the public health applications of Health Information Technology. Current CDPH activities include:

  •  Funding of 26 acute care hospitals in Chicago to assist in their efforts toward establishing capacity to transmit data of public health significance to CDPH;
  • Partnering with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), GE Healthcare and the Alliance of Chicago in a pilot evaluation the feasibility of targeted, pubic health-oriented clinical decision support for ambulatory providers, delivered at the point of care through Electronic Health Records;
  • Supporting Stroger Hospital of Cook County and two major Federally Qualified Healthcare Center (FQHC) networks (ACCESS Community Health Network and the Alliance of Chicago) in their efforts to establish robust transmission of immunization administration data to the Illinois immunization registry;
  • Engaging with the Illinois Office of Health Information Technology in statewide efforts to build a sustainable Health Information Exchange (HIE);

What is the future of public health in Chicago?

[Slides 6 and 7]

During my tenure at the Chicago Department of Public Health, which has been about a year and a half so far, I have stressed the importance of focusing on public health strategies that effectively address the actual causes of death, rather than what is found on a death certificate. Groundbreaking work done by McGinnis and Foege at CDC in the early 1990’s, and fine-tuned since then, demonstrated that the actual causes of death are largely related to individual health behaviors and social circumstances — not genetics, not access to health care.

Dr. Thomas Frieden, Director of CDC, looked at these, took it all in, but then went further and asked:  “now that we have a better understanding of the actual causes of death, how can public health, charged with improving the health of the population, best intervene?”

[Slide 8]

The most effective interventions, at the base of the pyramid, address the social determinants of health and the way that our society is structured.  Taking this approach to heart, I challenged our team at the Chicago Department of Public Health to develop a draft of a public health agenda that best meets this current understanding of effective public health interventions. And while our emphases have been near the bottom on the pyramid, I recognize that there is a need for effective programs at each level.

If you follow Chicago government, you might know that Mayor Emanuel committed to releasing a public health agenda for the City of Chicago in the next 100 days (well, 97 days by now since he’s been in office for 3 days already!) Our public health agenda is a blueprint for action intended to serve as a framework for a focused, yet comprehensive, approach to how the Chicago Department of Public Health will lead and work with partners to improve the health and well-being of the people in Chicago.

Our public health agenda:

  • identifies priorities to guide our public health work over the next five years;
  • sets measurable targets, achievable by 2020, to improve the health and well-being of Chicagoans;
  • sets policy, programmatic and educational & public awareness strategies that can be measured and monitored; and
  • serves as a vehicle to engage communities, partners, and other public health stakeholders in health improvement efforts.

The priorities presented in this agenda were identified through an assessment of public health data and resources, as well as current or potential stakeholder involvement. Reflecting a multi-tiered public health approach, for each priority area, this agenda presents strategies organized into three sections:

  • ·      Policies, including regulatory changes and laws that will be pursued to improve the public’s health;
  • ·      Programs and services that will be delivered, and
  • ·      Education and public awareness

I am sure it is no surprise to anyone if I share our priorities with you. I am talking about Obesity Prevention, Tobacco Use, HIV Prevention, Teen Pregnancy Prevention, Cancer disparities with a use case on breast cancer disparities in Chicago. I am also talking about heart disease and stroke, about violence prevention and about access to healthcare among others.

These are exciting times in Chicago. In 97 days, our City will have a clear public health agenda. We will have a focused set of priorities. We will make our targets public. We want the public to hold us accountable. Chicago invests around $200M every year in our public health system. We owe it to Chicagoans to do our best to stretch those dollars and get the best return on investment. This is my commitment to you today. As you get ready to start the next phase in your career, I call on all of you to join me in this journey. I guarantee you it will be a lot of hard work but a lot of fun and we will get a healthier city.

 

There are many ways to have an impact on health:

  • ·      Treating the sick –
  • ·      Preventing the illness in the first place through screenings
  • ·      Population-based prevention strategies

I hope in your work in public health, regardless of the setting, you keep in mind the concept of the “third revolution” (Breslow) in public health. Now that we have made significant progress in addressing communicable disease (first revolution) and made progress in chronic diseases (second revolution), we are poised to embark on the third, where communities are healthy and the goal is promoting health and not just preventing disease: “Health promotion reaffirms considering not only how to avoid being sick, a negative concept, but also how to expand the potential for living, a positive view: The main difference between health promotion and disease prevention is the premise of health promotion regarding health as a resource of everyday life”.

We all know the impact of clinical medicine on public health.  To promote health, we need to think beyond just clinical medicine. We have to be involved in social policy.  All social policy is public health.  Fiscal policy is health policy.  Education is public health. Housing is public health.

Perhaps in your schooling, or on your own, you saw the film “Unnatural Causes: Is Inequality Making Us Sick?” Through four hours of excellent documentary film making, it makes crystal clear what needs to change in our society if we are going to be truly healthy:

  • ·      It’s less poverty
  • ·      It’s quality housing
  • ·      It’s quality education
  • ·      It’s viable communities filled with resources geared to the needs of the particular population

I grew up in Lebanon in the midst of a civil war. I saw the impact of violence on individuals, on families, on community and on the whole country. I suffered the impact of violence myself.  I saw the impact on my own family, in my own community.

In medical school at the American University of Beirut, I spent time seeing patients in Palestinian Refugee camps in Beirut. I talked to so many people who lived their whole lives in an environment where I might not choose to live.  I saw firsthand the impact of forced migration on health.

In Houston, at Baylor College of Medicine, I trained in a community health center serving mostly Mexican immigrants who struggled to make a decent living. I learned about homelessness by providing clinical services to people living in shelters, under bridges, in cars and on the streets.  I saw firsthand the impact of poverty and lack of housing on individuals.

In Rockford, at Crusader Community Health, I served as a medical director of a community health center network. I learned about more migrant communities. I learned more about public housing. I learned more about HIV/AIDS.  I saw firsthand the impact of poverty on different communities.

At Heartland Alliance for Human Rights and Human Needs, I worked with immigrants and refugees on the North side of Chicago. I also worked with many of the Heartland Alliance global health team:

  • ·      the team working on HIV Prevention among Men who have sex with men in Nigeria
  • ·      the team working on sexual and gender-based violence in Sulaymaniyah, Iraq,
  • ·      the team working on torture and trauma treatment in Momostenango, Guatemala
  • ·      the team working on Maternal Child Health in Patzcuaro, Mexico
  • ·      the team working on child soldier reintegration in Srilanka

I visited with some of these sites and learned from the Heartland staff and most importantly I learned from the participants in these programs.  What I learned from all of these experiences is simple.

To empower individuals to achieve their human rights, and to empower communities to achieve their potential, we cannot think about health care alone. We have to think about healthcare. We also have to think about housing. We have to think about economic security. We have to think about legal protections.  This is what public health is all about.  This is what we need to address as public health people.

I hope that with your public health education and approach you will keep in mind that a healthier society is a society where healthier choices are the default choices.  A healthier society is a society where children have good schools to attend, and safe neighborhoods to play in.  A healthier society is a society where parents have enough resources to provide their children with a rich experience in life.

What do you need to do to be a better person?  What will you do to build a healthier society?  How can you contribute to social justice?  What role will you play to advance human rights?  Join me today in dreaming big for our communities.  I always did. I always will.

From being a little kid playing on the beach of a small Mediterranean town in Lebanon, dreaming about a safer Lebanon to the conversation I had the last week with Mayor Emanuel when he asked me to stay as part of his Cabinet, I always dream big for our community.

Today is a milestone in your career. Please join me in dreaming big.

Wet-Nurse city of laws: Beirut of Lebanon (Beryte during Roman Empire). Part 2

Between 150 and 551 AC, the city of Beirut (Beryte) was the official Roman State law center and this recognition extended to the Byzantium Empire.

Beirut had the preferred law school for law students and professors flocking from the four corners of the Empire.  Beirut was called “Mother of laws” and “The most magnificent city” during the Roman Empire.

Emperor Justinian I (527-566) attributed to Beirut the title of “wet-nurse of laws”. In the 5th century, Beirut law school started teaching law in both Latin and Greek languages.  Paradoxically, the main language of the common people was the written language Syriac (Aramaic,  the language spoken by Jesus).

Another demonstration that written languages are the domain of the elite classes used as coded language for administrations and government of people.  Common people had to suffer the consequences of not knowing the language of their dominating Masters; in this case either Latin or Greek.

In the second and third century, Beirut produced the 5 most famous and illustrious classical Jurists who had written the “Digeste”, “Institutes”, Rules, Sentences, and Constitutions.

They are:  Gaius (110-180), Papinian (142-212) and assassinated for his stands, Paulus, Ulpian (170-228) and assassinated for his positions, and Herrenius Modestinus.  They were called the “Oracles of Roman laws” because judges had to decide cases based on the opinions of these  five justices.  If there is equality in opposing opinions then it was the opinion of Papinian to be the definitive resolution.

The third century generated the State professors Gregorius, Hermogenius, Marcian, Scaevola, and Tryphoninus.

The fourth century produced the professors Domninus, Scylacius, and Sebastianus.

The fifth century, called the most brilliant for the law school of Beirut, generated the state professors Euxon, Sabinus, Cyril the elder, Patricius, Demostenes, Domninus, Eudoxius, Amblichus, and Leontius.  Most of the illustrious law professors were born in Lebanon and Syria and reached the highest positions in the Roman and Byzantium Empires.

In the sixth century, Beirut school of law had the professors Dorotheus, Anatolius, Julien, Thalelee, Isidore, Stephane, and Thereupon.

Rome fell in 476 and Western Europe had to wait until the Crusader’s campaigns (1096-1291) for the Justinian civil code of laws the “Digeste” to be found and rediscovered and then applied in Europe starting in the 12th century.

In 551, an earthquake demolished the city of Beirut.  The law school was temporarily moved to Sidon.

In 560, as the professors returned to Beirut then a huge fire burned the city again.  Beirut was still in ruin by 600.

As Islam Arab conquered the Near East region in 635, Beirut recaptured its previous status as a law center, but without the brilliance of previous periods.

Beirut was compiling Islamic laws according to “Charia”.  During the last 7 Omayyad caliphs and the first two Abbassid caliphs (690 to 770) the Lebanese theologians (ulema) and judges (fakihs and cadis) were the cornerstones for the nascent Islamic jurisprudence.

Imam El Uzahi (707-774) from Baalbek and who studied in Beirut and lived was the most brilliant and most sought after fakih in his life.  His doctrine was applied in Lebanon, Palestine, and Syria for 200 years.

Then, the doctrines of Hanafi (Syria), the Chafii (Egypt), the Maliki (Andalusia and Northern Africa)  took the ascendancy.

In 1877 was founded the first modern law school in Beirut bu Bishop Youssef el Debs.  The law school of the Wisdom (La Sagesse) had the professors Nicolas Naccache and Boulos Effendi Zein wo compiled the ottoman civil law (Medjellet) in 16 books of 1851 law articles grouped in six subjects.  Current Beirut has the law schools of the french Jesuits founded in 1913 by Paul Huvelin; the State Lebanese school established in 1959; the Arab University under the patronage of the University of Alexandria and instituted in 1960; the Byblos law school linked to the Maronite Order of Kaslik Holy Spirit University; and the Islamic Chiaa faculty instituted in 1994 by Imam Chamseddine.

Beirut and Lebanon were ruined by mankind during the civil war that started in 1975 and lasted 15 years.  Beirut is being rebuilt with modern highrises that lack its original spirit

Note 1:  The American University of Beirut has not yet opened a law faculty.  If we know that most of the members in the Lebanese Parliament are lawyers and barely anyone of them master the English language then, whatever deal the US government had with France for the monopoly of jurisprudence philosophy and procedure must be outdated.

Note 2:  Topic taken from the book “Beryte School of law” by Joy Tabet (67 pages)

Inaam Raad of (Syria Nation Socialist Party): Biography

Note: The internet users in Lebanon have adopted numerals as symbols for a few Arabic vocals that are not possible or never attempted in some other languages. For example, 3 is used for a strong “aa”, 2 for a different “a”, 7 for a strong “h” and so forth.

April 7, 2007

Biography of In3am Ra3d

Late In3am Ra3d assumed leading executive responsibilities in the Syrian National Social Party since he joined it in 1944.  His most frequent appointments were in propaganda and cultural positions then, he was elected a member of the legislative body in the party and its Highest Council.  He was elected four times chairman of the party until his death from cancer in February 27, 1998.

In3am was born in 3yn Zhalta in 1929 and wed Laila Dagher whom he met at the American University of Beirut (AUB); they had three children, Elham, 3issam and Amaal.

In3am Ra3d was the youngest of two brothers and four sisters; he earned a BS in Political and Economic sciences from the American University of Beirut in 1949.  He had to submit to the final exam while he was incarcerated after the Party failed coup d’etat in 1949 and the summary execution of its founder Antoun Sa3adeh.

He was imprisoned twice in 1949 and then in 1961 after the second failed coup d’etat until his release in 1969.

In3am moved in 1936 to Egypt with his father.  He stopped in “Haifa” on his return trip in 1938 via the rail that linked Egypt to Palestine to Lebanon as the borders were opened and the Zionist State was not yet established. He talks about Haifa with owe as a city perched on a hill by the sea, the jewel of all cities.

After In3am short stay in Egypt, the family settled in Ras Beirut, an area close to the American University and where the nationalist movements and ideas interacted. His father graduated from AUB as a pharmacist and immigrated to Australia fleeing the Ottoman conscription in WWI; his father supported the SNSP but asked his sons never to join any political parties.

In3am was one of the founders of the Lebanese National Movement when the civil war broke out in 1975 and became the Vice President to Kamal Jumblatt.  His leadership in the Party and the Movement between 1975 and 1977 and his overwhelming successes in expanding the potentials of the Party inside and abroad earned him the medal of Sa3adeh in 1977.

He resigned in 1977 in favor for Abdallah Sa3adeh as the best qualified for the new circumstances.  He published several books such as: “The National Liberation War” (1970), “The Strategic Revolutionary Ideology” (1976), “War of Existence and not war for borders” (1979), “Antoun Sa3adeh and the Isolationists” (1980), “The National Confrontation on the Lebanese Front” (1982), “The Conspiracy (Mou2amara) in its Last Phase” (1989), and finally “The Middle-East and Zionism” (1997).

I feel the need to expand on the life of devotion and dedication of In3am Ra3d to the ideology of the Party and his total participation in its failures and successes because I witnessed the upheavals of the Party between 1970 and 1975.

In3am did his secondary studies at the National University in Aley as a boarder and where the famous writer and critic Maroun 3aboud taught, as well as his brother Theodor. This school witnessed the gathering of students from most of the Arab World and the demonstrations for the independence of Lebanon from the colonial protectorate of France.

In3am delivered his first speech there in 1943 and joined the Party in 1944 at the age of 16 when Ghassan Tueiny was the “Mounafez 3am” (General executive) of the students.  He was appointed “Moudir” (Director) of the freshman and sophomore at the AUB in 1947 and joined the thousands of members at the airport to welcome their leader Antoun Sa3adeh.

In the summer of 1948 he joined the camp in Dhour Chweir where the Party concentrated its forces to face the edict of the Minister of the Interior to arrest Sa3adeh; In3am had brought the leader a letter from the “moudir” of 3ain Zhalta without passing through the hierarchy and Sa3adeh told him: “Your letter is a matter of details that should be resolved through the hierarchical channels; I deal with the essentials in national cases”. 

Two days later the leader dissolved a few “moudirya” in the Chouf region and appointed In3am to restructure the cells.

In3am was appointed administrative official of the party “moufawad” on the Arkoub region in 1948 in order to reorganize its cells after the leader or “zaim” fired the former chairman Ne3met Tabet from the Party.

Mr. Tabet had focused on the Lebanese Nation after its independence as the Leader was in exile in Argentina; Tabet exclusively attributed the Syrian National characters on every aspect of the new State.

On the first of March 1948, Sa3adeh said to In3am: “We are in dire need of analytical minds because we are presently going through a tough struggle and serious ideological communication.”  In3am was appointed in 1948 as vice president “namous” (secretary) to the student “mounafazieh” at the time the Arab Nationalist Movement, headed by Costantine Zrik and George Habash, was in its infancy.

Sa3adeh paid a special visit to the AUB when In3am and his list of candidates won the student election; during one of his strolling through he campus the Leader told In3am: “The main difference between our capitalist class and the ones in more advanced nations is that our kind of capitalism is not founded on industrialization which seeks unified and larger markets; but we have simply an outmoded mercantile system”

By the time Sa3adeh was executed in 1949 In3am had already experienced responsibilities of “namous” in both the cultural and propaganda ministries or “omdat” (Minister).

After the execution of Sa3adeh, George Abdel Massi7 was elected chairman and the Party moved its headquarter to Damascus and became the dominant organized force in popularity and in the Syrian army.  In3am had to move to Egypt for a while because he could not teach in any schools in Lebanon.

In 1951 In3am was directed to organize the election campaign of the member Ghassan Tueni for deputy in the Chamber representing the Chouf district and became the administrator of his office after victory.

In 1953 the Party member and Chief of Staff Adib Chaychakly became the Syrian President after a coup d’etat; but Abdel Massi7 refused to allow the Party to share the power on the ground that the Party was not prepared for assuming the power.  It is valid to conjecture that Abdel Massi7 feared that Adib might replace him at the helm of the Party; a position he had no intention of relinquishing.

Most of the Party candidates to the Syrian Parliament lost in 1954 when the party failed to be perceived neither as in the opposition nor as the ally of the government.   The Highest Council legitimately deposed Abdel Massi7 but failed to inform the base of the reasons for dismissing the chairman which led to the first split in the Party.

Thus, the High Council dispatched In3am overseas with Assad Ashkar to the USA, Venezuela, Brazil, Argentine, Mexico, Columbia, Western Africa, Paris and London in order to recuperate the members’ allegiance to the legitimate leadership.

In3am failed in the Parliamentary election of 1958 because the “Second Bureau” (military intelligence agency) of President Fouad Chehab has incarcerated all of In3am’s key players or main contacts in the election process for 24 hours at Election Day. A big convoy of In3am election campaign made a big detour to avoid the army barrages toward 3ain Zhalta and stopped at 3ain Traz where the Orthodox Catholic Patriarch Sayegh was staying.

In3am had changed his religious denomination from Anglican to Catholic in order to be a candidate and the Patriarch asked him: “You want to discuss the election and you have changed your religion?” and In3am told him: “One of our Party principles is the separation of State and religion and I would ask you not to interfere religiously in that campaign and let the people of that district decide”.

In3am Ra3d was again a candidate to the general Parliamentary election in 1960 and the power to be made him fail.  In3am has published the same year an article in the Party daily “Al Bina2” encouraging a closer tie with the Soviet Union since the USA was completely supporting the Zionist State:  The Soviet Ambassador Nicola Crabvin paid him a visit to the daily for further inquiries on the official Party directions and their relationship developed.

Mr. Ra3d was also the key player when the Party developed its tie with Iraqi President Abdel Karim Kassem when he met him within an official visit of the Lebanese newspaper correspondent association.  The contact man was the Iraqi Foreign Minister Hashen Jawad who had delivered a speech at the UN asking for the total liberation of Palestine and then the process for an attempt to coordinate the defense and economic cooperation among the Syrian Nation Independent States was in the making.

The Party had another attempt for a failed coup d’ etat in the New Year of 1962 and In3am suffered nine years of imprisonment.  During the incarceration period In3am wrote many articles that were published in the daily Al-Nahar.

The first congress of the Party was held in Melkart Hotel in Beirut in 1970 and it was a turning point for the leftist direction of the party without adopting the Marxist ideology which was anathema to viewing nationalism as a viable force for securing self-determination of the oppressed people and excluding many potential strata as enviable leverage to the success of political and social changes.

I attended that congress as a university student member who submitted a paper; all I know is that the paper was related to constitutional structure; my paper was a naïve alternative to boot because I don’t even recall what the orientations of the various factions were.  I was a member for barely a year and never had any responsibilities that would allow me to be an informed member in the congress.

I am under the impression that I favored that the election of the Highest Council and the chairman of the Party should be democratically voted in by the base of the eligible members and not by the trustees as was the tradition in order to break the vicious circle and allow the new blood to redirect the priorities and ideology of the Party to suit the drastic changes in the political framework.

I guess the congress held in Melkart sustained the trustee system but adopted the new left directions and cooperation with the Soviet Union.  I believe that the democratic election by the base might not generate the best leadership but at least it would have reflected the slow changing behavior of the members and thus, would have avoided the subsequent splits and violent factions.

The democratic process has the advantage to open up freedom of opinions, debates and a wider communication among the members.  The trustee system looks good logically and might be the best alternative at the beginning, but it usually becomes obsolete to the base and inevitably leads to dictatorship of a certain political class of elders with vested interests.

After the Melkart congress, the party underwent many internal disturbances such as the objection of many members of the support of the Party to Camille Chamoun’s list of candidates to the Parliamentary election in 1972 then, the revolt of many “mounafezeen 3ameen” against the elected Highest Council and the capture under duress of many party centers, and then the “Abu Wajeb” Movement that occupied the office of the students’ “mounafez” and the main headquarter in Jal El-Dib followed suit.

In my opinion, one faction believed that the Syrian Baath regime is better positioned to represent the interests of the Syrian Nation against the Zionist schemes and the other faction, headed by In3am Ra3d, viewed the maneuvering of the Syrian regime to controlling the Lebanese political parties as means to strengthen its position toward peace negotiation with Israel under the heat of a war threat.

In3am was elected chairman of the Party in March 11, 1975, a month before the civil war in Lebanon started.  Within two years, chairman Ra3d managed to unify the Party and lead it to be the main force in the Lebanese Nationalist Movement and allied to the Palestinian Liberation Movement.

Evidently, Yasser Arafat wanted to control as many Lebanese political parties in order to strengthen his position toward the Arab States who were involved in the Lebanese crisis.

This biography clarified many issues which were very obscure to me; for example the many instances of splitting within the Party under various lame excuses, such as the illegalities in the constitution and transfer of powers or the left ideological directions of one faction away from the fundamental teachings, were basically a political rationalization for the pro Syrian Strategy in the area versus the adhesion to the Lebanese Movement which was supporting the right of the Palestine Liberation Movement to making independent decisions.

I witnessed most of these upheavals but was not clear on their final objectives: I was not wholeheartedly active in the internal politics of the Party; I was following orders that never came my way.  I was definitely pro the In3am Ra3d orientations and attended most of his gatherings and was included in the small click and many times assembled in his home close to the AUB.

I sensed that the pro Syrian regime faction in the Party was not credible because the current Syrian Baath regime was viewed as a sectarian Allawi faction imposing their dictatorship on the entire Syrian people. And frankly, the Syrian Baath did not communicate clearly the National Strategy and we were reduced to accept the tactics of the Syrian regime on face values that were contrary to the objectives of the forces of change in Lebanon.

I recall that, while a graduate student in the USA in 1976, I wrote a lengthy article spread in two issues of the Oklahoma University daily; I explained the genesis of our civil war and Chairman Ra3d happened to receive a copy and read my article and ordered the “Monaffez” in the USA to contact me and actively work with me.

The Emergency Committee of the SNSP that elected In3am Ra3d as chairman in March 11, 1975 was composed of Bashir Obeid (who was later assassinated by the “Mourabitoun” in 1982 in Beirut), Abdallah Sa3adeh, Mostafa 3ezzedine, Mounir Khoury, Fouad Sa3b, Kamel Hassaan, Mas3ad 7ajal, Hafez Sayegh, Daoud Baz, Rida Khattar, Jamal Fakhoury, and 3adel Hashem.

In3am decided neither to recapture the centers nor to negotiate with the insurrectionists and went ahead with the rebuilding of the Party and the reorganization of the cadres and calling for the Dauville congress where the members were given the right to contest  “ta3n” the candidates for the rank of trustee.

In3am was instrumental in forcing the Lebanese National Movement to adopt the civil personal registry which abolishes the mention of sectarian affiliation for the citizens and this change was to be included as an item in Judicial Reforms section.

During the civil war, the Party had only 60 pieces of Seminov (machine gun) and the only source for arms supply was Abu 3amar who lavishly offered very outmoded arms like the Browning and Schneider.  Yasser Arafat stopped supplying the Party even with these ancient arms because In3am refused to sign on a petition condemning the abduction of Colonel Morgan by a Palestinian organization on the basis that these activities bear no responsibilities to the Lebanese National Movement.

The only time the Party was able to receive decent arms was when Libya agreed to supply and train officers for the Party.

There was a strategic disagreement with the LNM that insisted on considering the Aley/Souk Al-Gharb offensive line as priority while the Party viewed that the Metn region was the most important region to defend and concentrate the forces.  Consequently, the Kataeb managed to enter 3aintoura and executed two dozen members of the Party by aligning them against the church wall.

The Party managed to conquer and retain the Sanine heights and thus prevented the Lebanese forces to link with the city of Zahle in the Bekaa Valley.

The struggle of In3am in bringing the democratic process in the election to the Party brought fruit; the current process offer every member who had been in the party for two years and paid his dues to elect a candidate to the National Convention.  Every 25 members are entitled to one candidate and the election takes place in every “mounafazieh”.

The National Convention elects the members of the Highest Council who elects the Chairman who designates his ministers. Thus, the National convention is constituted of the elected candidates and the trustees.  The trend is to eliminate the trustee title or at least not to confer to the trustees’ automatic rights to the National Convention.


adonis49

adonis49

adonis49

December 2020
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Blog Stats

  • 1,442,616 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.adonisbouh@gmail.com

Join 784 other followers

%d bloggers like this: