Posts Tagged ‘Ariel Sharon’
A Palestine State? Lost in 1993 as Israel was convinced that all was swallowed up and done with
Posted October 7, 2014
on:A Palestine State? Lost in 1993 as Israel was convinced that all was swallowed up and done with
By 1993 the Israel government knew for certain a Palestine State could not be established in the West Bank.
The settlements were there, billions were invested. The entire Jordan river valley was settled with villages, there were major cities (exclusively for Jews) already built in the West Bank, the entire Jerusalem was taken over by Israel.
There was no place any more for a Palestinian state to be established, and that is when Israel said OK, we will begin negotiations.
(Israel was under heavy pressure to negotiate a kind of a “peace” with the Arab world after the “Liberation of Kuwait” from the troops of Saddam Hussein. A peace conference was decided to resume, and Israel wanted to deal with the Palestinians alone as the weaker party)
They allowed Arafat to come; misleading him into thinking that they were really intending to make peace and basically forced him to sign an agreement that would complete his surrender..
Yasser Arafat was willing to give up almost 80% of his homeland and the right for the Palestinian refugees to return to their homeland and be compensated, all for the sake of peace, what he wouldn’t go beyond was 20% , he wouldn’t give up Gaza and the West Bank, that he couldn’t do.
They wanted him to sign a surrender agreement and he wouldn’t.
Its not the Palestinians that are not willing to make concessions, its Israel that is incapable of making concessions , because concessions on the land are impossible from a Zionist perspective, the whole name of the game is taking the land and making it ours and this exactly the process that took place.
From Miko Peled “The Generals Son” Humanity for Palestine Robert Martin Fighting for humanity Australians for Palestine Advocacy Group #FreePalestine
Note: Arafat was NO fool by any stretch of the imagination and he knew how to hold on power and be connected with all Arab leaders.
By 1993, Arafat was vegetating in Tunisia. The Palestinian resistance fighters were kicked out of Lebanon in 1982 (by Sharon when he entered Beirut), and from Jordan in 1969 (by King Hussein), and Arafat had no cards left to put any pressure on anyone.
By 1993, Arafat had lost any hope that he could rely on any Arab State to practically and strongly back the Palestinian cause.
By 1993, Arafat was cornered and ha little choice but to grab on the bait that Israel PM Rabin was dangling to him.
Arafat was no fool and he knew that Israel was no fool in asking to negotiate a “peaceful settlement” with the PLO.
For Arafat, if external actions were almost impossible to carry out, at least he could change his tactics by getting active from the inside, on any piece of land within Palestine.
Israel PM Sharon didn’t even want to negotiate with Arafat as Rabin had decided.
Sharon ignited the Second Palestinian Intifada in 2001 that Arafat didn’t want by invading the Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem.
Sharon reacted savagely to the Oslo agreement, and publicly claimed that Rabin should be assassinated, and his wishes were satisfied as a body guard of Rabin did the job (the first political assassination in Israel) and Sharon snatched the power in Israel.
Sharon placed Arafat in de-facto house arrest in Ramallah and then assassinated him in 2005.
Sharon withdrew the Israeli settlement from Gaza, claiming that Gaza was never part of Biblical Israel, but part of Egypt.
Sharon build the Wall of Shame separating Israel from the West Bank.
Arafat took a calculated gamble, but circumstances turned not in his favor:
1. Bush Jr. was voted in as president by a ludicrous margin and
2. Sharon was steadfast in cancelling out any previous agreement with Arafat.
3. And the Arab States were cowed after the US invaded Iraq in 2003.
4. Sharon wanted to tear Iraq apart because Iraq was the main powerhouse in the Levant, in population, wealth, education… and not on the border with Israel to invade at Israel pleasure. And the US was fooled to believe that controlling oil production and distribution cannot be done without land military presence in Iraq.


Why the Maronite Patriarch feels this urge to visit Jerusalem? Treaty of 1946: Between Jewish Agency for Palestine and the Maronite Church
Posted May 18, 2014
on:Why the Lebanese Maronite Patriarch feels this urge to visit Jerusalem?
Treaty of 1946: Between Jewish Agency for Palestine and the Maronite Church
The Maronite Patriarch of Lebanon Bshara Al Rai (Ra3i) has decided to join the Pope in his visit to Jerusalem, on the ground of his responsibility to pay visits to the Maronites living in Palestine and Israel.
Many political parties and organizations in Lebanon have been contacting the Patriarch and counseling him from going ahead with his decision.
Mind you that the Jews in Israel have started a wave of widespread defamation of churches and removing crosses from Christian cemeteries.
The same behavior as practiced by the Islamic Wahhabi extremist fundamentalists anywhere they occupy a region and cities in the Moslem World.
And no one of these Jews have been apprehended or detained.
What are the implications of the creation of a minority Jewish state on identity politics in Lebanon?
Check article 4 for one of the reasons of this visit
Treaty between the Jewish Agency for Palestine (a political agency) and the Maronite Church
May 30th 1946
(Two years before the creation of the State of Israel when Lebanon was already recognized as a State by the UN)
“We, the undersigned:
1. His Beatitude Antoine Arida, the Maronite Patriarch of Lebanon, acting on behalf of the Church and the Maronite community, the largest community in the Lebanese Republic with citizens residing in other countries, represented by Cheikh Toufic Aoud, ex-minister by virtue of authorization addressed to the President of the Jewish Agency, Professor Weizmann on May 24th 1946,which hereinafter shall be in this treaty addressed as “first party”.
2. Dr. Bernard Joseph, acting on behalf of the Jewish Agency for Palestine which is known in International Law as the representative of Jewish people around the world aimed at creating the Jewish National Home in Palestine,which hereinafter shall be in this treaty addressed as “first party”.
ART.1: The first party expressly and fully recognizes the historical link uniting the Jewish people to Palestine, the Jewish people’s aspirations in Palestine, and the Jewish people right to a free immigration and independence in Palestine. It also declares its approval on the Jewish agency’s declared current political program including the establishment of a Jewish state.
ART.2: The second party expressly and fully recognizes the independence of Lebanon and the right of its inhabitants to choose the regime they deem as appropriate. The second party also declares that its extending and widening program does not include Lebanon. On the contrary, it respects the state of Lebanon in its current form and borders. The Jewish immigration does not include Lebanon.
ART.3: The two parties commit themselves reciprocally to abstain from undermining their respective aspirations and status; the so-called commitment has a binding obligation restraining the representatives of both parties – officials and non officials – in the country, abroad, in international conferences whether occidental or oriental, from expressing any kind of support to decisions or actions that may harm the other party. Also do their utmost to avoid taking such decisions or undertaking such actions.
ART.4: The two parties commit themselves to provide mutual help at the following levels: political, commercial, security and social in order to promote the position of the first party and realize the aspirations of the second one. This engagement includes:
a) Raise the awareness of public opinion in the Orient and the Occident on the cause of each party, according to the spirit of the treaty hereby.
b) Concert their efforts to open the doors of each country with view to deepen cultural and social rights and promote commercial trades and the exchange of liaison officers to forge good neighboring relationships between one another.
c) The first party recognizes the right of every Jewish to immigrate to Palestine commits itself to help as much as possible in the realization of this immigration in the event that it shall pass through Lebanon.
d) The second party commits itself, after the creation of the Jewish state, to respect the sacred character of the holy sites in Palestine and commits itself as well after retaining the command of power to consider the treaty hereby as an integral part of the government program.
e) The two parties commit themselves to provide help, if requested, to one another in order to maintain security in their respective countries. This engagement has the binding obligation to take all necessary measures to block the entrance or exit of hostile elements capable of sowing public disorder and the obligation to refrain from providing any kind of help for such elements.
f) The two parties commit themselves to exchange information on all issues such as the politics of their countries, their economy, security, and relations with third parties.
g) At the industry, agriculture and scientific research levels, the two parties commit themselves to exchange information and advice in order to synchronize the Lebanese and Jewish efforts with a view to ensure the best development of their respective industries (including the tourism sector), agriculture and research on the basis of mutual cooperation.
h) After creating the Jewish state, the second party commits itself to reserve a friendly treatment to the representatives of the Maronite Patriarch, to facilitate the buying of a land and the construction of a Patriarchate worthy of the Maronite community.
i) The second party commits itself to require from its offices all over the world to support the cause of the first party and back its representatives in Washington, London, and Paris and in international conferences.
ART.5: In order to achieve the afore-mentioned obligations, and additional practical means of collaboration and mutual aid, the two parties will hold direct or indirect (through representatives) talks depending on the relevant advancement and circumstances. The first party has already chosen Cheikh Toufic Aouad to be its authorized representative till further notice.
ART.6: The treaty hereby takes effect upon signature. Each party has the right to terminate it within six months notice.
In witness whereof the two parties have signed this treaty.”
Double original copy, Jerusalem, May 30th 1946.
On behalf of His Beatitude His Grace Antoine Pierre Arida, Toufic Aouad
On behalf of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, Bernard Joseph
Source: Central Zionist Archives 525/3269
Note 1: The treaty was between the Patriarch of a church and a Zionist political entity. That the current Patriarch expect this treaty to still be valid and respected by the State of Israel is tantamount to committing a big political mistake.
In any case, Israel never respected any treaty that stopped serving the Zionist apartheid system and its annexation policies.
Note 2:
1. When General Ariel Sharon‘s troops slammed into Lebanon in the summer of 1982, their purpose was not only to drive out the PLO, but also to bring to power a friendly Maronite government led by Bashir Gemayel.
2. The idea of an “alliance of minorities,” based on the “enemy of my enemy” notion, had deep roots in Zionist thinking.
3. Before Israeli statehood the relations between Zionists and some Maronite leaders were far-reaching.
4. In 1946, a treaty of sorts was even signed with the Maronite religious establishment, but the peace proved as ephemeral as the 1983 agreement between Lebanon and Israel. (that was not ratified)
Eisenberg sympathetically explains the motives and misperceptions that led to the belief that Christian Lebanon could be detached from the surrounding Arab region as an ally of Zionism, but she also shows the project had no realistic chance, and she implicitly warns against ignoring the lessons of history.
Note 3: I cannot recollect that any Lebanese Patriarch ever visited Jerusalem after 1948, even when Jerusalem was administered by Jordan Kingdom.
Note 4: The visit has political connotation, regardless of the religious reasons and excuses. The Patriarch has to make a public declaration relevant to the treaty and to clarify the Lebanese political positions regarding the Israeli enemy.
Note 5: The Patriarch must avoid to land in Tel Aviv or cross any Israeli checkpoints. A helicopter from Jordan and landing straight in Jerusalem should be considered.
Hot posts this week (April 5/2014)
Posted April 13, 2014
on:Hot posts this week (April 5/2014)
- Opening bottles of champagne. Celebrating election victory of your Israeli occupier?
- America’s 25 Most Awkward Allies
- From Brooklyn to Bo-Kaap (Cape Town): Mos Def, A.K.A. Yasiin Bey
- St. Patrick’s Day: What is wrong, a lie, a misrepresentation, misconception…
- Kornet Chehwan, Lebanon: Re-opening of the Phares Zogbi Foundation library
- Halloween, April Fool’s, Religious signs… Are you permitted to dress up?
- “These sweet Lebanese Christians kiss the hands of ladies and commit the worst of atrocities…” Ariel Sharon
- UnAmerican Activities: House Committee and Pete Seeger testimony
- Warring Syria Goes Hungry: Stick Figures, Stunted Growth…
“These sweet Lebanese Christians kiss the hands of ladies and commit the worst of atrocities…” Ariel Sharon
Posted April 3, 2014
on:“These sweet Lebanese Christians kiss the hands of ladies and commit the worst of atrocities...”
والترجمة هي من النص الإنكليزي لمذكّرات شارون وتبدأ بفترة التحضير للاجتياح الإسرائيلي في عام 1982): «وأنا أيضاً كنتُ أريد أن أرى لبنان بنفسي كي
آخذ شعوراً بالملموس عن الحالة على الأرض هناك، وخصوصاً من أجل فهم إذا كان هناك أي شيء ممكن توقّعه من القوّات اللبنانيّة المسيحيّة في حالة الحرب. وأنا كنتُ قد التقيتُ ببشير الجميّل للمرّة الأولى عندما كنتُ وزيراً للزراعة خلال واحدة من زياراته للقدس لبحث العون الذي كنّا نقدّمه (لهم). ولقد ترك عندي انطباعاً (إيجابيّاً) آنذاك على أنه رجل شاب مليء بالثقة بالنفس والعزم. تحدّث بإقناع وبسلطة، ولم يكن هناك شك بأنه كان قد أظهر قدرات قياديّة حقيقيّة. لكنني شعرتُ
Hot Posts this week (Jan. 21/2014)
- Israel’s Apartheid Wall: Facts, Figures, and United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.
- Downtown Beirut: Memory erased…
- Predicting the Future, Delight the Weird, Hard work of understanding
- Ariel Sharon defending his horrors in 1982: Hang me if you like…
- Another Trap? Open-Office: More health problem, lower productivity…
- These pictures are Not from Syria: Taken in Saudi Arabia…
- Share your experience in a Lebanese Prison
- US Presidents who expanded the Territory of the 13 colonies…
- Sieges in Syria: Babies starving to death… And Yarmouk refugee camp
- Who is Daniel Ellsberg? Predecessor of the whistle-blowers…
Hot posts this week (Jan. 16/2014)
- Shatila Camp survivors (Palestinians and Lebanese) recollect the massacre: Of Sharon’s Beirut genocide in 1982
- Quenelle de Dieudonné M’bala M’bala? (Nazi reverse salute?) Who is he? And Zemmour position…
- “ALL RELIGIONS ARE TRUE” in Falsehood? And POPE FRANCIS condemnations…
- Rational Millennial? Fighting for 5 economic reforms…
- Willpower: A science? Have you formulated the wrong resolution?
- Young Ariel Sharon: Has he ever changed?
- Beauty of Arabic language? Tedblogguest “From Lebanon to the world”
- Andrew Jackson (1767-1845): The most powerful and popular US 7th President in the 19th century
- Another Myth: Health Care’s Free Market
- Frequently Sick in winter? Are there more viruses or weakened immune system is more prevalent?