Posts Tagged ‘Ayn Rand’
Today offspring are tomorrow monsters; (September 18, 2009)
The optimist Biosphere/Earth has its own stabilizing mechanism; it is indifferent to power-avid pessimist man. This unattached earth/biosphere mechanism may burn, suffocate, or drown man and it would not even notice or care for its existence.
Through the ages earth/biosphere underwent changes and man either thrived and developed or died consequent to the environmental changes. All the time, man got curious about his environment and wanted to understand and then uncover the mysteries of that power surrounding him and controlling his life cycle. By the bye, man formulated general laws of nature; then, before he could fathom a tiny portion of the complex mysteries and the multiple interactions among the sparse and conditioned laws this impatient and anxious man endeavored to modify and transform nature to his own wants and restricted interests.
Man wants to alter earth and the biosphere with the tacit understanding that he will not be affected. Man keeps forgetting, intentionally, that he is what he is because of earth and biosphere. Man can alter earth and biosphere; biosphere will, imperturbably, react at its own pace; the offspring of today are the monsters of tomorrow; if the monster is permitted to exist at all.
The Western “modern” mind insisted that “the genesis of man (species and child development) is a process of primarily interacting with things; human interactions are a secondary and not a significant factor”. In fact, most early scientist and researchers lived in their islands of palaces or laboratories with little contact with people. They were intent on mastering their material environment. Ayn Rand’s writings incarnated the mentality of the individual attribute of spirit and intelligence. She wrote: “The spirit is an individual attribute. Collective brain does not exist. Man living in relation to others has no reality.” Ayn Rand was expressing the prevalent pre-supposition at the turn of the century and she was formulating their radical consequences.
Jules Verne stories of individualistic heroes and his successors of visionaries, explorers, adventurers, exploiters, and colonial expansionists refused to admit limitations to their intelligence and undertaking power. They had grand “destiny” to impose and prove: man is born to reign and dominate and not to complain. Something broke then we fix it. Something blocked expansion then we erased it: there are always solutions to difficulties. There are no inherent problems to the enterprising man; as Napoleon said “Impossible is not in my vocabulary”.
Jules Verne never missed a good shooting spree story at savages; in “Five weeks in balloon” they are shooting at the African negros from the top of a balloon; in “The children of captain Grant” they are shooting at will on Maoris in New Guinea from the top of rocky hills; in “The travel around the world in 80 days” they are killing the Sioux Indians from the doors of moving wagons; in “From Earth to the moon” they are annihilating the Seminole Indians; in “Mathias Sandorf” the savage Senoussis of Libya are exterminated.
Colonialism was initiated and undertaken by “democratically” elected government; thus fascism, Nazism, and communism have nothing to do with the spirit of “modernizing” the “barbaric” people. Our current modern man is typified by “Hot Air” Charles Branson; I don’t means his cross Atlantic, Pacific, or around the world balloons and airliners but gases emanating from his ass hole. The Western heroes are children who do not want to be rebuffed from the game: the entire planet is their game land. “When we were children, we were told not to feel afraid or cry: it was shameful. It was a time, and still is pretty much, when growing up meant to vanquish fear; to live in the delusion of the all conquering man.”
Human intelligence and know how are intrinsically community intelligence. It is the community that initiates man to things and behavior. Man needs at least 16 years of inter-communal aid and secure before he gets aware of his individuality and begins to revolt and seek a semblance of independence.
We are at a junction when man is capable of envisioning a limited earth (weight, circumference, volume, and extractable minerals) and limits to the biosphere (thickness, density, and constituents). There are intersections at several levels of consciousness. We are beginning to comprehend the limitations of technology to containing the power of nature such as tsunamis, earthquakes, volcanoes, and changing climates; the catastrophic consequences of mastering nuclear energy (Chernobyl is a striking example); the long term problems of gigantic projects such as deviating rivers, and building monster dams. We realize that our survival is intrinsically linked to the biosphere. It is a junction of the meeting of man’s brain with the limits of biosphere and our recognition that biosphere is much more complex and that it has indeed engendered our kind of intelligence.
We are harassed with the dictum “Science is neutral; experiments are unbiased”. One of the urgent tasks of the United Nations is to investigate how science and research are financed or funded. Everything has a political direction and I contend that sciences, research, and technologies are primarily driven by deep pocket political interest groups. We can no longer keep fighting those biased and politically oriented “research” results instead of focusing on the reality of earth/biosphere degradations.
Book reviews: Of controversial manuscripts? Posted in 2008
Many of the books that I have reviewed were written prior to 2008, before I discovered wordpress.com, and they might be categorized as controversial.
It is not my job to fall into that trap of judging what is fine to read. I simply reviews, summarizes, and add my comments of what I have read that express deep feeling and personal reflections.
I always give my “expert” opinions anyway: It is your right to express your opinion.
There are books that I had to publish several posts on particular chapters, simply because topics are interesting and need further development.
1) “Life after Life” by Dr. Raymond Moody, (written in June 7, 2004)
2) “A Priest among “Les Loubards”” by Guy Gilbert, (written in July 22, 2004)
3) “We the Living” by Ayn Rand, (written in July, 24, 2004)
4) “Prophesies of End of Time” by Paco Rabanne, (November 15, 2004)
5) “Alexander the Great”, (November 20, 2004)
6) “The Lexus and the Olive Tree” by Thomas Friedman (July 28, 2006)
7) “Season of Migration to the North” by Tayeb Saleh, (August 10, 2006)
8) “The Princes of the Crazy Years” by Gilbert Gilleminault and Philippe Bernert.
9) “Carlos Ghosn: Citoyen du Monde” by Philippe Ries, (Septembre 27, 2006)
10) “Abbo”by Nabil Al Milhem, (November 23, 2006)
11) “Human Types; Essence and the Enneagram” by Suzan Zannos, (December 6, 2006)
12) “One hundred fallacies on the Middle East (ME)” by Fred Haliday, (March 2, 2007)
13) “Origins” by Amin Maaluf, February 15, 2007
14) “Imagined Masculinity” edited by Mai Ghoussoub and Emma Sinclair-Webb
15) “Post-modernism: the Arabs in a video snapshot” by Mai Ghoussoub,( March 4, 2007)
16) “The Joke” by Milan Kundera, (March 22, 2007)
17) “Fahrenheit 451” by Ray Bradbury, March 28, 2007
18) “Biography” of In3am Ra3d, April 7, 2007
19) “Al-Walid Bin Talal”, April 4, 2007
20) “The Gardens of Light” by Amin Maaluf, April 19, 2007
21) “Two old women” by Velma Wallis, May 1, 2007
22) “I heard the owl call my name” by Margaret Craven, May 3, 2007
23) “A woman of independent means” by Elizabeth Forsythe Hailey, May 6, 2007
24) “The Gospel according to Pilate” by Eric-Emmanuel Schmitt, May 9, 2007
25) “Les innovations du XXI siecle qui vont changer notre vie” by Eric de Riedmatten.
26) “Tuesdays with Morrie” by Mitch Albom, July 3, 2007
27) “Liban: le salut par la culture” by Phares Zoghbi, August 19, 2007
28) “Finding Joy” by Charlote Davis Kasl, August 22, 2007
29) “Tadjoura” by Jean Francois Deniau, Septembre 6, 2007
30) “How to dance forever” by Daniel Nagrin, September 8, 2007
31. “The Second sex” by Simone de Beauvoir, (September 21, 2007)
32. “A short history of nearly everything” by Bill Bryson, (September 25, 2007)
33. “The God of mirrors” by Robert Reilly, (October 1st, 2007)
34. “The tipping point” by Malcom Gladwell, (October 9, 2007)
35. “The social structure of Lebanon: democracy or servitude?” by Safia Saadeh
October 15, 2007
36. “Fallaci interviews Fallaci and Apocalypse”, by Oriana Falaci (November 8, 2007)
37. “Aicha la bien-aime du Prophet” by Genevieve Chauvel (November 19, 2007)
38. “Tess of the D’Uberville” Thomas Hardy, (December 19, 2007)
39. “Le livre des saviors” edited by Constantin von Barloewen (December 22, 2007)
40. Gandhi’s non-violent resistance guidelines (February 21, 2008)
41. “The Da Vinci Code” by Dan Brown (March 12, 2008)
42. “La reine de Palmyre” by Denise Brahimi (March 26, 2007)
43. “Culture et resistance” by Edward W. Said (April 18, 2008)
44. “L’Avorton de Dieu; une vie de Saint Paul” by Alain Decaux (April 23, 2008)
45. “Down and out in Paris and London” by George Orwell (July 14, 2008)
46. “Why the Arab World is not free?” by Moustapha Safouan (July 21, 2008)
47. “Igino Giordani” by Jean-Marie Wallet and Tommaso Sorgi (August 5, 2008)
48. “Building a durable World” in “Science et Vie” magazine special issue of June 2008 (August 10, 2008)