Posts Tagged ‘Day Dream’
A Day Dream Orphanage located in Non colonial power nations
Why in non colonial power nations? Because of all the rules and regulations that anyone has to go through the bureaucratic entanglement that hinder compassion projects to fruition.
Mama should be freed from house/institution daily maintenance: No mopping, no cooking, no washing…
Mama is living with and amid the kids 24/7.
Kids with no parents, from all colors, ethnic groups, genders, religion…
She is happy to touch the kids and be touched by them. Love to talk to the kids and listening intently to what they are communicating to her and their brothers/sisters
Mama is Not an accountant and will Not manage the household.
Mama controls the quality of the food, the health and safety of the kitchen, the proper procedure for cleaning the house.
Mama is ever ready to laugh with the kids, cry when they cry, crawl on four if they do, play with the sand, walk barefoot when the kids prefer this liberty of movement. Eat with her hands if needs be.
Mama bath the kids, teach them how to wear their clothes, their shoes. Teach them how to clean after themselves in the WC and in their rooms, to hang and arrange their clothes and belonging…
Mama sleeps with the smaller kids in the dormitory. Cuddle those who suffer from nightmare. Read to them before sleep time and listen to music with them and appreciates what they like to hear.
Mama wants her house within the town. Never outside the town community, where cultist movements and a secret extremist religious sects prefer to hide their behaviors.
Mama love to take the kids out to shop, to visit museum, parks, zoos, supermarket, movie theaters, take them in bus trip, trekking in nature and camping adventures.
Yes Mama feels comfortable to initiate the kids to the outside lifestyle, working, jobs…
Mama purpose is to shield the kids from physical harm and bullies.
Mama will Not shield them from emotional and mental confrontation: the kids will feel free to express their emotions and opinions and acquire a first defensive line against the professional hypocrites who spread all kinds of mythical stories and faked prophecies.
Mama will make sure the kids are Not to attend and join religious events and ceremonies, or to get any kinds of religious teaching where their only power is to instil fear of punishment in the heart of the kids.
Mama knows that a few of the kids will grow stupid and join a few of these religious sects, with the conviction of abstract concepts that rob them from the beauty of life and nature and sane rational mind.
Note 1: Mama would be lucky if she find a soulmate (male or female), who support her dedication and is happy to live around Mama. And feel that life has a meaning around Mama. Sure, kids needs to be around males “role model”, but Mama should not feel that this is a precondition to establishing an orphanage.
Note 2: It would be advisable to have a wide range of ages among the kids: the older ones need to be exposed to care and comprehend the needs of the younger ones
Note 3: Where Extremist religious sects prefer to locate?
The active extremist members of religious sects live in ghettos in the suburbs of urban surrounding.
They observe the surrounding and have a notion of the civil laws but prefer to abide by the ghetto laws.
If the religion has a set of laws, they take it and run with it.
They are the most secretive and isolate of clans, kind of living in ghettos within ghettos.
Did you Day Dream a Utopian Project?
Posted by: adonis49 on: May 20, 2009
Did you Day Dream a Utopian Project? (May 19, 2009)
Have you day dreamt of a utopian project? I have so many times day dreamt of projects that were to be ideal in profitability, organization, equitability, fairness, encouraging and promoting individual creativities, and leaving plenty of free time for individual accomplishment and continuing education. There are moments in any one of these projects where the more utopian you strive for the more variables you have to contend with. Every detail generates its down set of variability and quickly the interactions are too many for the mind to coordinate and analyze. Suddenly, you end it as abruptly as in happy movies. Yes, it is complicated but everybody should be living happily ever after.
Then you are carried by curiosity: you want to take the dreamt up project further to its ultimate glory. The more you resolve complicated interactions among people the more your solutions revert to totalitarian solutions and the more your answers smack of a one party regime reactions to diversities. Then I realize that, fundamentally, I am not better than any dictator who managed to amass enough power to exercise coercions at will. Utopias are dangerous exercises of the mind and they sting potently the trust in our potentials to fairness and equitability. The only utility to dreaming up utopia is to vent up the bottled up anger of helplessness to act and change. Utopias are far more dangerous when a restricted and select caste of elites assemble to apply and enforce their sick view of an ideal society. Utopias are not the solution and never will improve human conditions. Read any samples of Utopias from Plato, to Tomas Moore, and to the Zionist ideology and you will realize that the end product is a subdivision of society by caste systems where people rule and the lower strata produce and serve; the end product is a huge set of rules and regulations that can put to shame the gigantic daily constraints of the Jewish Pharisee sect.
Study the Utopias of those who managed to horde power from Napoleon, to Bismarck, to Hitler, to Mussolini, to Lenin, to Stalin, to Mao Tse Tong, and finally to Bush/Cheney and the end product was destruction, utter humiliation of the people, hate crimes, and genocides.
There are other kinds of utopias. You have those forecasting the future, fifty years from now, in all sorts of topics such as political systems, emergence of new superpowers, technological breakthrough, social conditions, trends of how fast people will die of famine, and the increase in social divides among the wealthy and the dregs. Sure, those forecasters inevitably claim that they are analyzing current trends if all conditions remain controlled, though they have no idea what are those conditions and how they are controlled. Forecasting the future is another way of thinking aloud individual utopia because no one is forecasting without strong biases as to his present mind set.
So far, the only valid forecasting time line is of six months; it is adopted by the analysts of market and fashion trends of the adapters in the age category of 20 to 30 years. There is no doubt in my mind that promotional tactics biase people in believing that they are setting the trend by surfing the internet and disseminating their interests; but that how democracy should be at work. Democratic systems should expose programs and disseminate them and then evaluate what people selected after a period of six months of diffusion among the active population.