Adonis Diaries

Posts Tagged ‘democratic spirit

Israel 2011: Less “democratic” and far more sectarian. By Antoine Shalhat.

The Palestinian/Israeli journalist reported from Akka, translated from Arabic and published in the Daily Al Nahar:

“Today is the Hebrew New Year.  It is the occasion for the census bureau to submit its report on Israel demographic status, and for Israel Democracy Center to transmit statistical analysis on democratic trends in Israel communities.

That is going to be tough to dealing with Israel society tendencies, retrograding in its concept of democracy and increased base of religious political ideology.

Secular people have dropped to 42% and religious Israelis have increased to 58%.  The Jews who want a “pure Jewish State” have jumped to 78%.  Meaning:

First, they want to transfer every citizens who is not Jewish by origin.

Second, they want to prohibit non-Jewish citizens to have a say in the discussions pertaining to social and economic matters

Third, cancelling the right to discussing self-autonomy alternatives.

Democratic spirit in Israel is declining.

About 51% of the Jews want to prohibit free-expressions in attacking government political decisions.

Another example, 58% are saying that speakers are not to extend political opinions in universities.

Another example, 63% want to impose political censorship on educational materials in schools and academic institutions…

The political climate in Israel, in the last two years, is for greater power to the extreme right religious parties: The Parliament (Knesset) has legislated many laws

1. prohibiting opposition to preemptive war policies,

2. any condemnation to “Israel Defense Forces” behaviors such as actions against civil rights and assaulting associations and organizations investigating activities smacking of violence on civil rights, or

3.  any discussion on resolving the Palestinian problems

The Legal consultant in the “Association of human rights in Israel” said: “In the last two years, we are witnessing increased signs on the field that demonstrate growing polarization of religious intransigence among the sectarian parties.  The trend is to killing any position out of the “National consensus” because it constitutes a serious threat to Israel security.  Any critique is viewed as anti-patriotic…

The trends in Israel, year after year, are of communities less democratic and far more sectarian.

The French weekly Le Nouvel Observateur published last week:

“Israel Shin Beth (internal intelligence agency) is worried of the good organization of the Jewish terrorist cells in the colonies, or Jewish settlements in the West Bank and Gaza.  The Jewish terrorist cells, called “youth of the hills”, adopted Al Qaeda principles in organization and decentralized formations, and have in possession large supplies of military hardware.  They certainly have tight connections in the army and many public institutions…”

(How could this happen if the organization and facilitation of these cells are not generated from the Shin Beth itself? The Shin Beth has all the potentials, the means, and the intelligence pieces for these kinds of terrorist activities)

Note:  You may read this article on the varieties of Jewishness  jewish-ashkenazi-sephardim-hebrew-israeli-semitic-hasidic-and-what-else/

Tarbouch, Gunbaz, and Sherwal municipal election in Lebanon; (May 4, 2010)

Part 2: Municipal election in Lebanon

This article is a follow-up on “Paved decrepit path: Half-cooked literates trailing feudal process” (link in note) describing the current Lebanese municipal election.  The results are in.  I’ll report the election results shortly: The results are the least interesting part in the story.

I contend that it is the process of planning, conducting, and following up an election that reflects accurately the mentality behind the political exercises and not the ideology or political inclinations.

For example, a candidate to a municipal election started four months prior to election date to spread his intention to run on a change and reform platform and he ended up following a feudal process.

After four months of preparation, a candidate who explicitly proclaims to be anti-feudalism but implicitly relishes the feudal process and applies feudal attitudes in his practices, can he but perpetuate the feudal political structureHow should you expect the municipal council to function if he is elected?

Feudal process cannot be broken unless a democratic spirit runs the election process of meeting with voters, public assemblies, and asking for input: It is an educational process for people to gain confidence in their individual potentials and be encouraged to offer opinions, suggestions, and determination to participate.

So far, municipal election in Lebanon is trailing exactly the feudal process, either out of ignorance of the mechanisms to running campaigns differently or, most likely, because of a deep-rooted traditional sets of behaviors that economic and political structures were designed to enhance archaic processes.

The two reasons go hand in hand since they are intrinsically linked to blocking meaningful changes in social political behaviors. Ideas do not change political systems; incremental and patient practices to changing individual behaviors do.

Briefly, a few candidates come forward as “leaders” to form lists of candidates to the council from among the various families or clans by projecting a feudal image; you get this feeling that if they wore the tarbouch, the sherwal,  and the gunbaz (outdated traditional attires of  respectively hat, XXXL loose pants, and robe) then you are transplanted into the 19th century.

One of my cousins is a supposed leader of a list; he didn’t deem it appropriate to pay me a visit and expose his intentions or ask for my opinions.

Actually, no one of the other three lists of candidates contacted me by any medium. You might think that they are respecting my seclusion or recluse life style (a mile away from hometown) but that is not correct.

The real reason is they all believed that I am in the “bag” of one list on clannish affiliation and that in a feudal system I am not supposed to be a reflecting individual who may change his mind.

In the mind of this “tarbouch” cousin, election is mainly technical exercises of “pointage” (voters in the bag and voters definitely opposite) and selecting half-cooked literates, similar to his mentality: Intellectuals are considered nuisance.

In the mind of this tarbouch cousin, intellectuals are just good to extend flatulent suggestions with no zeal to back opinions up on the field. My tarbouch cousin has a mindset that he is an expert psychologist and can judge people from the first glance:  you are either an ass-moving helper or just a vote in the bag due to clan affiliation.

I’ll label the three lists of candidates with feudal images; list of the Tayyar is the Tarbouch list, the list of the Kataeb the Sherwal list; and the list of the current and former mayor that is supported by Deputy Michel Murr as Gunbaz list.

The head of candidates in the Gunbaz list obtained 1,375 votes with a median of 1,050; the head of the Tarbouch list got 1025 votes with a median of 850; the head of the Sherwal list snatched around 850 with a median around 625.

Rumors are circulating that the four operators or keys or (mafateeh) in the Sherwal list were sold out to the Gunbaz list: they called up the troops of clans waiting for the last moment to vote as prices for the clan increased.

Rumors are spreading that about $600,000 were spent by the Gunbaz list on this election, mainly buying votes in the afternoon.

One female candidate in the Tarbouch managed a breakthrough (khara2t el lista).  It is evident that at least four candidates in the Tarbouch could have made it if they focused on the election campaign and luring voters instead of throwing early Victory celebrations a week ahead of Election Day.

Feudal system is a dangerous trap that most educated and highly cultured people fall in the process, simply by moving with the tide of clannish affiliations.

One of these cultured individuals did exactly what feudal mentality demands.  I had spread the news that I am not voting and had refrained to giving ride to my folks to the voting booths early morning. The Tarbouch strategy was to coax all its supporters to vote early morning in order to “saving their souls” from being purchased by the other deeper pockets lists.

By 3 pm, the cultured friend called me up and asked the favor of voting for at least his brother and one of his friend candidates. He said that I should do it by principle.

Paradoxically, I am the one to put forward this term “by principle” because the two candidates never contacted me and had considered me a non-reflecting person not worth talking to.  In the mind of my cultured friend, “by principle” meant obeying the clannish custom “I am with my brother against the others no matter what“.

Sadly, it never came to my cultured friend’s mind to ask the reasons for my reluctance and, worse, he didn’t care: His response felt like a kind of blackmail of either vote for my friend or consider 55 years of friendship as erased!

If I was not a stubborn guy who never misses his right of voting, I would have decided to decline voting altogether.

In Election Day, voters should be left to their conscience to vote; campaigning is done before Election Day.

Calling at 3 pm on Election Day on someone to vote is unseemly, and very displaced; this behavior should be left to feudal practices buying voters as the “price is right”.

I did vote and I included also the six women running on the three lists just to even out the odds.  I am glad to announce that three women are in the council this time around.

Another funny fact.

My brother-in-law heard my mother saying that I am not going to vote. He got hot and lectured me on the necessity of voting as my most undeniable and valuable rights.  After coming from church, he brought with him a pamphlet that the Bishop was distributing urging Christians to vote; he insisted that I read the pamphlet as confirmation of his position; neither I nor his eldest son paid much attention to the leaflet.

The new “global internet cultured” generation are focusing on issues of civil marriage, lowering voting rights to the 18 year-old, safe driving, and an ecological Lebanon. Basically, the most needed fundamental reforms.

Most candidates want change wearing the attitudes, posturing, and practices of the Tarbouch feudal.   I am in the dark as to why this municipal campaign was necessary: it was not a political campaign in my hometown; it was not even a campaign, period.

The entire exercise was that one list wore a tarbouch and the other one a gunbaz.

The result is the same in performance in the municipal council for either winners.

I had to be harsh:  I can no longer suffer this farce to be prolonged indefinitely.  Someone has to come down and do investigative reporting to clarify issues, which are as if they are the best kept secrets.

Everything can happen in Lebanon; even election on Constitutional date this time around.

Note: You may read Part 1




December 2021

Blog Stats

  • 1,485,160 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by

Join 816 other followers

%d bloggers like this: