Adonis Diaries

Posts Tagged ‘Forms of liquid money are not neutral

Smell of your money

I explained in a previous post “Color of your money” ( that liquidity (currencies and banknotes) is no longer neutral and that it has lost its mythical concept of a “lubricating” medium to facilitate the exchange of merchandise   This post is investigating the other attributes of money on family, close relative relationships, and how it might have contributed in changing value systems.

Money has acquired an “intrinsic” value,  independent of the barter value concept or image that most economists are still  trying to perpetuate for over a century.

The rationale was that, since money is mainly an oiling mechanism to encourage and expand commerce then, money should be dissociated from the economic factors of national worth.

The fact is that the lubricating notion of money was tampered with since after US independence when Britain regained its monopoly over issuing US money supply, which shrank the expanding internal trades.  For example,  when the authority refrains from accommodating economic expansion by infusing more money in the market then, money is overvalued:  Particular merchandises gets practically more expensive, internal market shrinks, export is slowed down, and commerce suffers because of lack of liquidity.

When a person is in need of liquid money then he is at disadvantage when bargaining for the right price of goods that he is trying to sell as liquid money is overvalued.

The dollar is still powerful ,though it is not worth a dime if accounted on factors such as national debt, gold reserves, or even manufactured goods.  The liquidity of the dollar, being accepted as a global currency for global exchange, is its fundamental power.   The dollar is steadily being challenged to be replaced by a basket of valuable reserves indexes.

This article “Smell of your money” examines the effects of money in the affective sphere among family members and close relatives.

Sociologists started with the hypothesis that money will enhance rational “cold” interactions among family members and thus, money will eventually tarnish the traditional family value standards.  Currently, sociologists came to the realization that it was changes in the value systems that affected monetary exchanges among family members.

For example, working wives decide on either a proportional (equity) division of incoming salaries or stubbornly insist on equal shares in the household expenses, even though women might be earning less than men.

Why this irrational decision for equal shares?

In this struggle for acquiring autonomy and equality between genders in society, a wife might react as if “equitability” is promoting the perception of older generation values of “man economic dominance and power in the household”.

Money has different smell and is not neutral relative to its sources.

For example, single mothers smell money differently with respect to the sources:  money received from State welfare systems is accounted differently than money acquired by other means and spent differently on personal wants.  Thus, money is spent and viewed differently.

Money gained from prostitution is lavishly spent on luxury items.  At first, we might attribute this lavish behavior as “re-investing” in the business: to catch high scale clients you have got to look it!  Then, the luxury trend makes room to a different smell of money: luxury generates luxurious behaviors that are not easily broken.  Money from prostitution is set aside for personal class statue appearances  (class standing) and reactions to society’s perception for this oldest of businesses.

Another example is related to divorce cases. Adultery is always and originally an affective hurt that might lead to divorce.  Adultery behavior is mainly mentioned and it then takes the forefront in monetary negotiation in a divorce deal when one party does not feel that the division is fair. The issue is “how much was spent to entertaining the lover?

Adultery thus becomes an important economic factor for dilapidation of family “confidence” and traditional value systems.  Adultery remuneration in divorce cases is comparable to winning the lotto: we feel free to spending lavishly this extra windfall that was not earned from our sweat.

Another example of smell of money is the gifts to family members.

Gifts are transformed from gifts in kinds into liquid money, though verbal “contracts” are usually attached on how money should be spent.  In the 1920’s, US social assistance to the poorer classes attached clauses on how money aid should be spent.  Consequently, social workers acquired vast supervisory leverage to controlling the recipients of money aid. Maybe one day, verbal contracts will be accepted by courts as information and communication technologies become standard tools in most family applications.

Change in value systems is the major factor that easily explains social transformations, but there are needs to considering the consequences of intermediate direct factors.

The intermediate factor is, for example, the expansion and development of economic base that generates various wants and needs.

The immediate factor is the transformation, due to economic expansion, to the creation of various forms of liquidity in money such as checks, credit cards, and technical facilities to withdrawing cash money.

Forms of liquid money are not neutral: they qualitatively contribute to value transformations within family relations.




November 2020

Blog Stats

  • 1,439,767 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by

Join 782 other followers

%d bloggers like this: