Adonis Diaries

Posts Tagged ‘government

A government was Not supposed to be for profit: Return the wealth to the citizens

Almost every State has foreign debts and internal debts to public institutions. Why the collected taxes from citizens are “invested” so that the elite class reap the profits?

Mind you that the US has $30 trillion in sovereign debt and increasing steadily and rapidly. Japan comes second. Even oil producing countries accumulated astronomical debts.

Where all the “Fresh Money” evaporated? And how much these Money are covered with real wealth?

اكبر عملية نصب… في تاريخ البشرية
يقال وما يقال ان الدين العام وغيره من الكلام الفارغ
….
كل الدول على الكوكب مديونة وعليها دين عام هائل مثل لبنان وأكثر منه بكثير
ومن هذه الدول الولايات المتحدة واليابان

عمل الدولة هو في الاساس عند نشأنها، تكون مفلسة فتقوم بطبع العملات وترميها في السوق.

الدول لا تربح وليس الهدف من انشائها هو الربح!

الدولة دائما هي المفعل الذي يحرك السوق
وعليها ان تبقى مديونة وليس لشعوبها ان تكون مديونة.

فالاوراق دائما تنتقل من الدولة الى المجتمع ولا يعود لها سوى بعض العائدات والضرائب.

ان ما يقال ان لبنان او الدولة اللبنانية مفلسة هو ابتكار مافيوزي

فالدولة اللبنانية غنية بعقاراتها واملاكها والعقارات الاميرية ومواردها الطبيعية ومؤسساتها كافة

وهذا الدين هو لا شيء بالنسبة لاملاكها وقدرتها وطاقاتها والضرائب التي تجنيها

ان عجز الدولة عن الدفع هو اصطناعي
لأن ادارتها اقتصرت على سحب العملات الصعبة من المواطنين الذين عملوا في الخارج والداخل بكد للحصول على العملات الصعبة.

ارقام بسيطة دون الدخول في تعقيدات الاموال.

ان ما تبقى من اموال بعد المصروف والدين والهدر، حسب تصريح المركزي هو ٣٠ مليار دولار احتياط
دون احتساب ما لدى المصارف من عشرات المليارات.

فلا يوجد مصرف لديه اقل من ٥٠٠ مليون دولار
ما يعني اقل تقدير ٣٥ مليار $ مع المصارف(٧٠ مصرف)

أن قيمة احتياط الذهب وحده اصبحت اكثر من ١٥ مليار دولار

هذا بعد الافلاس الذي يزعمونه!

المجموع هو ٨٠ مليار دولار لا تزال موجودة مقابل الليرة اللبنانية (تغطية الليرة بالذهب والدولار فقط ولم تحتسب التغطية التجارية لأن العملات تكون مغطاة ايضا بالميزان التجاري والحركة الاقتصادية)

٨٠ مليار $ موزعة على الشعب اللبناني عدده ٦ مليون نسمة=١٣٣٣٣$ لكل فرد لبناني من اطفال وعجزة وشباب وعاطلين عن العمل..
على سعر دولار اليوم وهو ٣٣٠٠ في السوق السوداء
ما يساوي ٤٤ مليون ليرة ليرة لكل فرد

أي انه فرضيا وزعنا الاموال الكاش على الشعب بالتساوي يكون لكل عائلة لبنانية من اربعة اشخاص ١٧٦ مليون ليرة لبنانية مغطاة بالذهب والدولار على اقل تقدير!
يعني اذا نام الشعب على ضهرو سنين
بيقدر يعيش ويصرف!

اما اذا تكلمنا عن موجودات الدولة العقارية من املاك خاصة واملاك عامة وهي لا تحصى تساوي مليارات الدولارات ويستوجب احصاؤها بدقة

ولما كانت الاملاك الاميرية وحدها مساحتها حوالي ٣٠٠٠كلم مربع أي ٣ مليار متر مربع يساوى المتر ما لا يقا عن ١٠٠$ وهي اراضي ذات مواقع خلابة واقتصادية وتحتوي على ثروات طبيعية

وقيمتها الاجمالية لا تقل عن ٣٠٠ مليار دولار
هذا ما عدا الثروات الغازية المرتقبة والبترولية

واذا اردنا تقييم هذه الثروات فأنها تجعل من الدولة اللبنانية من اغنى دول العالم!

كل هذا موجود، واعلنوا افلاس لبنان وعسرة المصارف!

السؤالات المطروحة: وين الافلاس؟؟ ولش حارمين الناس من مصرياتها

ان الضمانة الوحيدة للشعب اللبناني هي القضاء السريع وعليه التحرك بسرعة ضمن القوانين النافذة حاليا لفضح الاسماء وتوجيه التهم
ولماذا انتظار قانون جديد لمكافحة الفساد يسنونه على قياسهم؟

أوليس الافضل البدء بالتحقيقات الآن قبل ضياع الأدلة
وأكيد التحقيق مع كلن يعني كلن.

Delivering for citizens: How to triple the success rate of government transformations

An increase in the number of successful government transformations could help solve society’s greatest challenges, serve citizens better, and support the more productive use of public resources.

Governments around the world know that to deliver for citizens, they must transform the services they provide.

Aging populations are putting huge pressure on health and social services; educational systems need to equip young people with the skills for a technology-driven world; and the changing shape of cities is creating new demands on infrastructure. Many government services do not meet citizens’ growing expectations. These trends are contributing to public discontent.

Unfortunately, around 80% of government efforts to transform performance don’t fully meet their objectives—a key finding of a survey of nearly 3,000 public officials across 18 countries as part of a new study by the McKinsey Center for Government.

The study also includes insights from 80 case studies, as well as 30 in-depth interviews with leaders who have personally led transformations in government. Between them, these leaders have more than 300 years of collective experience in what it takes to succeed.

The failure rate of government transformations is far too high. It represents a huge missed opportunity to tackle society’s greatest challenges more effectively, to give citizens better experiences with government, and to make more productive use of limited public resources.

If governments around the world matched their most improved counterparts, they could save as much as $3.5 trillion a year by 2021 while maintaining today’s levels of service quality.

Alternatively, they could release substantial funds for the services citizens most care about, while keeping overall government expenditure constant.

Of course, this is easier said than done. Government leaders often have limited political capital, particularly in sensitive services such as education and healthcare, and in instances where ministers serve in a minority or coalition government.

The public sector often has too many priorities: leaders try to reform too much, across too broad a waterfront. Another challenge is a lack of leadership longevity. For example, a review of ministers of health across 23 countries from 1990 to 2009 found that half of them served for less than two years in office.

To grasp the prize, governments can learn from the 20% of transformations that do achieve their goals.

Our study not only shows what that involves but also highlights dozens of real-world success stories. It identifies five disciplines that, together, can more than triple the success rate of government transformations (exhibit).

These disciplines may seem obvious, but our research shows that they are extremely difficult to get right. We call them the five Cs:

Together, five disciplines can more than triple the success rate of government transformations
  • Committed leadership. Transformation leaders must go beyond standard public-sector management routines, committing extraordinary energy to the effort, taking personal responsibility for success or failure, leading by example to facilitate change, and challenging long-established conventions.
  • To inspire the transformation, they must spend substantial time communicating face-to-face with the people affected, listening as much as they talk.
  • Clear purpose and priorities. Successful transformations paint a compelling picture of their destination and make it crystal clear, to public servants and citizens alike, why change is necessary. In setting objectives, less is more: successful efforts keep targets few, specific, and outcome based.
  • One successful educational transformation in our study, for example, had just four major targets, covering enrollment in schools, enrollment in universities, evaluations, and information systems.
  • Cadence and coordination in delivery. Transformations differ markedly from traditional public-sector policy-development and implementation efforts.
  • They require a fast yet steady pace; a flatter hierarchy, with close collaboration among different agencies and functions; and flexibility, so problems are solved as they arise. They also require an empowered, focused transformation team to drive and track progress.
  • Compelling communication. Few governments communicate effectively enough to win hearts and minds. Nearly 90% of the participants in our survey said that the transformation would have been more successful if there had been more engagement with frontline employees.
  • Transformations need well-planned, in-depth, and genuine two-way communication with all the groups affected by change—especially the employees of the organization undergoing the transformation.
  • Capability for change. Although many highly skilled people work for government, they rarely have deep expertise and experience in change management. Reliance on business-as-usual capabilities is a major contributor to the high failure rate of government transformations.
  • Three sets of skills are particularly important: the ability to run complex, large-scale service-delivery organizations; project and program-management smarts; and digital and analytics capabilities.

Our study, looking ahead to the next horizon of government transformations, also draws inspiration from technology-enabled change initiatives in the most advanced public- and private-sector organizations. These pioneers are using the concept of citizen experience to understand the end-to-end customer journey in services such as public transport and business licensing.

They are drawing on design thinking to reconfigure these services in a way that integrates the needs of people, the possibilities of technology, and the requirements of the provider organization. And they are deploying agile practices to design, prototype, and test services—quickly—with users. Governments around the world can apply these innovations to transform their services at a faster pace and lower cost and, most importantly, to create outcomes that truly respond to the priorities of citizens.

Download Delivering for citizens: How to triple the success rate of government transformations, the full report on which this article is based (PDF–5.4MB).


adonis49

adonis49

adonis49

December 2020
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Blog Stats

  • 1,442,695 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.adonisbouh@gmail.com

Join 788 other followers

%d bloggers like this: