Adonis Diaries

Posts Tagged ‘Half-cooked literates trailing feudal process

Time says: “My story of eagle and storm”; (Apr. 28, 2010)

Paved decrepit path: Half-cooked literates trailing feudal process; (May 1, 2010)


This farce has dragged on too long; (May 4, 2010)


Who made the Gods? (May 5, 2010)

“You are a thief”; (May 7, 2010)


Just for today; (May 8, 2010)


Old fragrance from the dead; (May 8, 2010)

Tarbouch, Gunbaz, and Sherwal municipal election in Lebanon; (May 4, 2010)

Part 2: Municipal election in Lebanon

This article is a follow-up on “Paved decrepit path: Half-cooked literates trailing feudal process” (link in note) describing the current Lebanese municipal election.  The results are in.  I’ll report the election results shortly: The results are the least interesting part in the story.

I contend that it is the process of planning, conducting, and following up an election that reflects accurately the mentality behind the political exercises and not the ideology or political inclinations.

For example, a candidate to a municipal election started four months prior to election date to spread his intention to run on a change and reform platform and he ended up following a feudal process.

After four months of preparation, a candidate who explicitly proclaims to be anti-feudalism but implicitly relishes the feudal process and applies feudal attitudes in his practices, can he but perpetuate the feudal political structureHow should you expect the municipal council to function if he is elected?

Feudal process cannot be broken unless a democratic spirit runs the election process of meeting with voters, public assemblies, and asking for input: It is an educational process for people to gain confidence in their individual potentials and be encouraged to offer opinions, suggestions, and determination to participate.

So far, municipal election in Lebanon is trailing exactly the feudal process, either out of ignorance of the mechanisms to running campaigns differently or, most likely, because of a deep-rooted traditional sets of behaviors that economic and political structures were designed to enhance archaic processes.

The two reasons go hand in hand since they are intrinsically linked to blocking meaningful changes in social political behaviors. Ideas do not change political systems; incremental and patient practices to changing individual behaviors do.

Briefly, a few candidates come forward as “leaders” to form lists of candidates to the council from among the various families or clans by projecting a feudal image; you get this feeling that if they wore the tarbouch, the sherwal,  and the gunbaz (outdated traditional attires of  respectively hat, XXXL loose pants, and robe) then you are transplanted into the 19th century.

One of my cousins is a supposed leader of a list; he didn’t deem it appropriate to pay me a visit and expose his intentions or ask for my opinions.

Actually, no one of the other three lists of candidates contacted me by any medium. You might think that they are respecting my seclusion or recluse life style (a mile away from hometown) but that is not correct.

The real reason is they all believed that I am in the “bag” of one list on clannish affiliation and that in a feudal system I am not supposed to be a reflecting individual who may change his mind.

In the mind of this “tarbouch” cousin, election is mainly technical exercises of “pointage” (voters in the bag and voters definitely opposite) and selecting half-cooked literates, similar to his mentality: Intellectuals are considered nuisance.

In the mind of this tarbouch cousin, intellectuals are just good to extend flatulent suggestions with no zeal to back opinions up on the field. My tarbouch cousin has a mindset that he is an expert psychologist and can judge people from the first glance:  you are either an ass-moving helper or just a vote in the bag due to clan affiliation.

I’ll label the three lists of candidates with feudal images; list of the Tayyar is the Tarbouch list, the list of the Kataeb the Sherwal list; and the list of the current and former mayor that is supported by Deputy Michel Murr as Gunbaz list.

The head of candidates in the Gunbaz list obtained 1,375 votes with a median of 1,050; the head of the Tarbouch list got 1025 votes with a median of 850; the head of the Sherwal list snatched around 850 with a median around 625.

Rumors are circulating that the four operators or keys or (mafateeh) in the Sherwal list were sold out to the Gunbaz list: they called up the troops of clans waiting for the last moment to vote as prices for the clan increased.

Rumors are spreading that about $600,000 were spent by the Gunbaz list on this election, mainly buying votes in the afternoon.

One female candidate in the Tarbouch managed a breakthrough (khara2t el lista).  It is evident that at least four candidates in the Tarbouch could have made it if they focused on the election campaign and luring voters instead of throwing early Victory celebrations a week ahead of Election Day.

Feudal system is a dangerous trap that most educated and highly cultured people fall in the process, simply by moving with the tide of clannish affiliations.

One of these cultured individuals did exactly what feudal mentality demands.  I had spread the news that I am not voting and had refrained to giving ride to my folks to the voting booths early morning. The Tarbouch strategy was to coax all its supporters to vote early morning in order to “saving their souls” from being purchased by the other deeper pockets lists.

By 3 pm, the cultured friend called me up and asked the favor of voting for at least his brother and one of his friend candidates. He said that I should do it by principle.

Paradoxically, I am the one to put forward this term “by principle” because the two candidates never contacted me and had considered me a non-reflecting person not worth talking to.  In the mind of my cultured friend, “by principle” meant obeying the clannish custom “I am with my brother against the others no matter what“.

Sadly, it never came to my cultured friend’s mind to ask the reasons for my reluctance and, worse, he didn’t care: His response felt like a kind of blackmail of either vote for my friend or consider 55 years of friendship as erased!

If I was not a stubborn guy who never misses his right of voting, I would have decided to decline voting altogether.

In Election Day, voters should be left to their conscience to vote; campaigning is done before Election Day.

Calling at 3 pm on Election Day on someone to vote is unseemly, and very displaced; this behavior should be left to feudal practices buying voters as the “price is right”.

I did vote and I included also the six women running on the three lists just to even out the odds.  I am glad to announce that three women are in the council this time around.

Another funny fact.

My brother-in-law heard my mother saying that I am not going to vote. He got hot and lectured me on the necessity of voting as my most undeniable and valuable rights.  After coming from church, he brought with him a pamphlet that the Bishop was distributing urging Christians to vote; he insisted that I read the pamphlet as confirmation of his position; neither I nor his eldest son paid much attention to the leaflet.

The new “global internet cultured” generation are focusing on issues of civil marriage, lowering voting rights to the 18 year-old, safe driving, and an ecological Lebanon. Basically, the most needed fundamental reforms.

Most candidates want change wearing the attitudes, posturing, and practices of the Tarbouch feudal.   I am in the dark as to why this municipal campaign was necessary: it was not a political campaign in my hometown; it was not even a campaign, period.

The entire exercise was that one list wore a tarbouch and the other one a gunbaz.

The result is the same in performance in the municipal council for either winners.

I had to be harsh:  I can no longer suffer this farce to be prolonged indefinitely.  Someone has to come down and do investigative reporting to clarify issues, which are as if they are the best kept secrets.

Everything can happen in Lebanon; even election on Constitutional date this time around.

Note: You may read Part 1

Paved decrepit path: Half-cooked literates trailing feudal process; (May 1, 2010)

Municipal Elections in Lebanon

In my hometown, there are obtuse half-cooked literates constituting the newer classes of feudal “bosses” running for municipal election, and forming lists of candidates:  These literates may be able to read but they don’t (at best they browse their “favorite” daily); they could write a few sentences but never do. The feudal process of packaging lists of candidates goes as follows:

The “bosses” of each list, bored and in need of occasional excitements, get together in non formal setting (custom of relaxed chattering postures go nicely with entente in town’s affairs). First, the contending bosses lukewarm attempt to form joint lists, just for the sake of confirming in their famous pamphlets that they communicated and discussed town interests but unfortunately, communication failed miserably.

Under more favorable conditions, analyzing the various pamphlets could be very interesting and an essential part of the election. I discovered that the pamphlets were similar and pretty identical; kind of copy-paste of older versions.  Programs are out of the question: they don’t rhyme with feudal prerogatives. The logic is simple “why fool the voters with programs if they don’t take them seriously? The voters have learned not to take election programs with a grain of salt; even if the candidates wished to follow a program wholeheartedly.”

The process is applying the well-tested image of feudal mentality and practices:  Candidates got to be selected from the half illiterates from the various families or clans.  Yes,  a functional municipal council requires one boss; discussions and accounting must be kept totally opaque.  Once a list is complete (in our town the council is constituted of 15 members), then “eureka”: changes are on the way with the speed of a bullet train.

Now, each boss has a roster of voters and “pointage” of the leaning of each voter is undertaken.  For example, is this voter pro or con?  Does he need special attention to pay him a visit?  Is this vote to be bought and how much?  Does this voter can lean on the larger members of the family or clan?  I was not contacted one way or the other; I guess all the bosses classified me as a definite voter for one list; that I am not a reflecting individual; that I never change my minds and that no one ever change his position in a feudal town.

Now, taxis are hired and chauffeurs are dispatched to drop the famous lists of candidate to residences; the names of the lists comes with a long trail of the names of the father and grandfathers for discrimination purposes and for the older generations to reminisce on genealogy of the town. Anyway, why exacerbate matters with CVs: candidates are simple citizens and not government members? Mystery is the best tool to win the hearts and minds of voters: the less known is the character the better to win election: The more known is the figure the more warped the picture due to accumulated calumnies and belittling chats.

In my hometown, three lists of candidates are contending for the municipal council. Each bosses of lists included two female candidates.  How could they include more than two out of 15 members?  The bosses have no business with women and don’t know the varieties of women around: obviously, no professional women advisors were deemed viable in the selection process.  You hear rumors that valiant attempts to lure women in “politics” failed.  First, have women be contacted at the beginning of the process?  Second, what kinds of politics the bosses do for the benefit of the town to encourage women to participate?  Do they contact the proper sources in power and deep pocket to promote projects?  Are they in touch with foreign embassies to arranging twin coupling with foreign municipalities?  Are they planning and allocating funds to modernizing the administration?  Do they have in mind to starting a semblance of transparency in administration, project planning, discussion, and decision-making to encourage the general public to participating in town business?

I have no intention of voting: the “bosses” of the three lists took me for granted as a stupid clannish member of the community and they didn’t find it worth it of their time to contact me or include me in the process. I met with one boss of the Tayyar at a library; he was taking video of poetry recital and his son playing flute; that was a month before election time; he didn’t know me but I recognized him; we got into talking and he promised to relay my suggestions to the coming evening meeting for selecting candidates and resuming alliance discussions.  I never heard of him. My gut feeling is that he relayed my position but the code name was: “only half-cooked literate are permitted to butt in.”

No one of the candidates in the three list cared for my opinion then, why should they care for my vote?  If I ever change my mind then I might vote for the six female candidates on the three lists: The town is want of excitements.  Deep down, I wish excitements might degenerate into immolation of a couple of town people at the alters of the Gods of Ignorance and of the Absurd.  As far as I am concerned political parties in Lebanon are not valid parties:  two cheeks of the same ass; they stink.

Note:  They claim that a stupid individual is one who talks at the wrong moment.  My problem is not discriminating what is the proper timing:  I have missed so many opportunities postponing what I had to say.  I suggest to people not to clutter their brain of what timing is proper, and just talk and get talking.  I do write all the time.




December 2022

Blog Stats

  • 1,513,649 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by

Join 820 other followers
%d bloggers like this: