Posts Tagged ‘Hanna Arndt’
“Farewell Beirut” (book review, part 3)
Posted by: adonis49 on: December 4, 2008
“Farewell Beirut”, by Mai Ghoussoub (Part 3, November 16, 2008)
Note: Paragraphs in parentheses are my own interjections.
The third part of my review was hard and I delayed it too long because the demons that Mai is battling with are spread throughout the book.
I decided not to try to have a coherent or logical links among the different emotions that were troubling Mai and I will leave it to the readers to do their own homework and reflections.
The main theme in “Farewell Beirut” is “revenge” and the associated concepts of honor, genocides, nationalism, heroes, traitors, denouncers, martyrdom, punishment, hate, love and the fundamental human emotions that might be interpreted differently through the ages, and civilizations but where the moral values of wrong and right should not be left to personal matters of point of views.
There are cases of transient insanity such as degraded human values, mocked tradition, and disobedience of State laws and rules.
For example, why we tend to be more lenient toward the rotten moral values of officials simply because they didn’t show rigidity in the mind? If we admit that “traitors” are the product of dictatorship and wars and that this breed of people are present in locations fraught with danger (then most of us might have played the role of traitors under the right conditions).
People have the tendency to be more lenient with deficiency in morality than with extremist positions in ideologies and religious beliefs.
For example, burning witches is related to extreme social and religious dogmatism as a reaction for seeking consensus in an established social order. Heroes are not necessarily that honorable; take the case of this child who denounced his father who helped a few Gulag prisoners to escape to the soviet authorities and in return was awarded a medal of honor and much propaganda.
Take for example the French women who had sexual relationship with German officers during WWII and many of them begot offspring; they had their head shaven since hair is the most representative of female pride.
These head shaven ladies were the scapegoats to releasing the emotions for frustration and rage among the hungry Parisians. The worst part is that the mothers brought their kids with them to watch the dishonoring ritual. The women watchers are badly dressed which reflect a bad conscience in being part of the ceremony.
While the German used modern techniques to hide their genocide, the French “victors” adopted medieval means to humiliate and get revenge on the traitors and informers.
John Steinbeck said “We cannot take pictures of war because war is fundamentally emotions“.
In our back head, we always have fears for the reaction of those we have persecuted. The French star singer Arlettie reacted furiously and said “What! Are they also meddling in how we use our sex parts?” Many women had to survive under siege and everyone according to his potentials and skills.
The Argentinean navy officer Adolfo Silingo said:
“I was responsible for killing 30 people with my own hands and I do not feel remorse or repentance because I was following orders and I got used after the initial shock surprise. We knew that we were killing humans but we kept killing them! The civilians were in a semi comatose state from torture and we threw them out of the airplane like puppy dolls.
Most of the navy contingents participated in these mass killings” Adolfo is spending his life drunk on the streets trying to forget the “dirty war” during the dictatorship against his own people.
General Paul Tibits who dropped the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima is not penitent. These kinds of people were once considered heroes: how do you view them now?
Hanna Arndt would like to comprehend “Why these people did chose to stop thinking?”
Brecht screamed in one of his plays “Woo to the nations that count too many heroes!”
Simone Veil didn’t take it personal that she was incarcerated because she was Jew; she was interested to know “how people are propelled into a climate of condemning and defaming others”
This question is pertinent “Is it legitimate to hide truth in order to secure social peace?
How can we manage to forget and yet not take chances for the recurrence of the same sorts of atrocities?”
It is most difficult to find common denominators among the concepts of justice, moral values, and politics when judging cases of genocides.
Bertolt Brecht said: “Tragedies is about human suffering expressed in less seriousness than comedies. The perpetrators of genocides are not great criminal politiciasns but simple people who allowed horrifying political crimes to pass”