Posts Tagged ‘knowledge’
Twilight of “Love of Knowledge”?
Posted by: adonis49 on: April 21, 2021
Inertia of a thinking system in “Love of Knowledge”. Part 1
Posted on January 27, 2010
- In: philosophy | politics/finance Today
- There is this notion that philosophers are after the “Truth”, based on the assumption that they have this urge to go to the tiniest details and exhaustive possibilities of a concept.
- I beg to differ. Once a philosopher starts building structures for his line of thinking, then it is the system that tows and guides the “Truth”. It takes an insurmountable character of honesty to shake off the inertia erected by a system for a philosopher to restart his independent reflection in search of truth.
Philosophy from Antiquity till now was what is currently called “Ideology of the power to be” of the politico-economic system (the dominant classes of the period).
Philosophy was the super-structure of the apologetic social structure of a culture that has been flourishing for decades. Consequently, philosophy tried to make sense of the mood of the time.
What is striking is that most philosophical systems refrained to include the economical structure aspect into the equation. At best, the economic structure was indirectly referred to.
For example, slavery was accepted as a qualitative level in human nature: since animals are difficult to communicate with then it is better to leave it as is. It was if economy was a taboo notion because the class structure could not be altered.
Every politico-economic dominant class needs a valid interpretation of the statue-quo coupled with a rationale for the intelligentsia to take stock of the inevitable status that settled in and come along.
Thus, philosophers’ interpretations always were phased out by several decades of the “has been reality”.
In periods of alliances between the religious institutions and the monarchy it was required for God to taking center stage: people had to get used to letting God run their destinies.
Usually, the philosophical lines of thinking revolved in that guideline; these philosophical trends lasted long because the power was concentrated in the hand of the almighty alliance.
Superstition was king and empirical works led the bold experimenters to the fire to be burned alive as witches. Knowledge was built around abstract concepts or the realm of religious dogmas. Religious institutions dictated how the universe functioned and detailed the proper mental activities.
In periods of the rising middle classes (of traders, merchants, and lately the industrial class of entrepreneurs) philosophical systems set man in center stage of the universe.
It was important that man regains his place instead of God: The church-monarchy alliance was not to regain political-economic supremacy and control. Consequently, man was to discover and investigate his “backyard” (earth and universe).
Scientific knowledge, empirical experiments, discovery, and world adventures were the result of opening up new market for exploiting many more people for added values of merchandises, and mostly for enslaving and exploiting more people.
Hegel realized the historical interpretation process of philosophical structures as a fundamental aspect of civilization changes, but Hegel failed to find the intimate connection with the politico-economic source.
The historical dialectic method could make sense of the super structure of “knowledge” development in an a posteriori phase; thus historical dialectics could not forecast the synthesis for the current period since the source of the dialectics (politico-economics) was not within his range of expertise.
It was Marx who realized the power of historical dialectics when applied to politico-economic realities. It made sense from Marx position to declare that history started when class struggle was identified as the catalyst for change and knowledge development.
It means that if a “hot” culture wants to understand or create a history for its society, then it must invest in gathering artifacts and ancient manuscripts that shed light on the class structures through the phases of its history.
Democratic systems are trying hard to diminish civil administration interference with religions in its habit of demanding religious inputs and backing to political activities and programs. This phenomena is called “separation of religion and civil rules”
Commencement Address to graduating Harvard architects, May 30, 2011
I do disseminate articles that are worth re-publishing, as well as translating what I think people need to read. I edited out redundant sentences and shortened the speech.
“By getting this far, the Harvard Graduate School of Design class of 2011, have proved that you possess a certain, incredible talent. It’s a talent that is unique to our species. And if you were to rank this talent among members of our species in general, I have no doubt you would all be in the top 1% of 1%.
I’m not talking about intelligence, fine breeding, good looks, dress sense, or compelling social skills. I am talking about the talent which some would call… imagination or invention or innovation. It is the remarkable ability first of all to model some aspect of the external world inside our heads… and secondly to play with that mental model until suddenly… bingo… you find a a way to rearrange it so that it’s actually better. This is the amazing engine that underpins both technology the T of TED, and Design the D of TED. It is this skill that has made possible human progress of the last 50,000 years.
Espoused in a mind over here, I think I can just about make out… a gorgeous building, full of natural light whose bio-inspired curves evoke wonder and delight in everyone who sees it. Over there, I can see a once barren industrial wasteland converted into a glorious city park where people gather, mill, walk, play and dream. Here is a spectacular city of the future, one in which cars are replaced by intelligent, next-generation transport systems, and human-scale meeting places where people naturally mingle and connect. A city which breathes and adjusts and interacts with its citizens like a living system.
Today there’s a growing consensus that we should think of humans differently. That far from living in separate cultural bubbles, we actually share millions of years of evolutionary history. That there are far more ways that we are the same than that we’re different. The anthropologist Donald Brown has documented more than 200 human universals present in every culture on earth. They ranged from things like body adornment, feasting, dancing to common facial expressions and, yes, shared aesthetic values. This latter question has been the subject of countless experiments around the world in the past couple decades, and they’ve mostly revealed an amazing degree of resonance among vastly different people on what they find… beautiful.
This shift is surely allowing us to change the language in which architecture is discussed. In a world of pure cultural relativism, there are no absolutes to appeal to. To succeed you had to learn the opaque language of a tight-knit clique of critics and opinion formers. It didn’t matter if the rest of the world was left scratching its head.
Today, slowly, gingerly, it’s become possible once again to use language the rest of us can understand. I think it’s even OK to use that B word again: Beauty. Not as a proxy for arrogant artistic self-expression, but as a quest to tap into something that can resonate deeply in millions of souls around the world. I’m happy to report that in the last couple years at TED, we’ve been wowed by a new generation of architects like Joshua Prince-Ramus, Bjarke Ingels, Liz Diller, Thomas Heatherwick and others, as they’ve shared with us – in plain English – their passion, their dreams, and yes, the beauty of what they’re created.
When Thomas Heatherwick shared his vision for a stunning, new residential complex in Kuala Lumpur, curved out from narrow bases like a bed of tulips, I had just one thought. I wish I had been born in the future.
I suppose an architect might have dreamed of such a development 30 years ago… but it could never have been built. And that brings us to the second trend. Technology is changing the rules of what’s possible. The astounding power of computer-assisted design and new construction techniques are giving us the ability to actually build what before could only have been a whimsical doodle on a sketch-pad.. .
Suddenly, the fractals and curves of Mother Nature, are a legitimate part of the architectural lexicon. And around the world, as people watch these new buildings arise, instead of muttering “monstrosity”, their jaws are dropping, their eyes moistening.
And finally, perhaps most important of all, we’re at a moment in history where the world is paying attention to you like never before. As leading designers of scale, you, more than anyone else, hold in your hands the answers to the most important question we all face. Namely this. Can the coming world of 10 billion people survive and flourish without consuming itself in the process.
The answers if they are to be found, – and I think they will – will come from… design. Better ways to pattern our lives. There is nothing written into our nature that says that the only path to a wonderful, rich, meaningful life is to own two cars and a McMansion in the suburbs.
But it’s becoming urgent for the world to start to see a compelling alternative vision. Probably it’s going to come down to re-imagining what a city can be, and making it so wonderful, that few people would want to live anywhere else. If there are to be 10 billion of us, we will have to live close to each other — if only to give the rest of nature a chance.
Indeed, more than half the world already lives in cities and the best of them offer so much to the world : richer culture, a greater sense of community, a far lower carbon footprint per person – and the collision of ideas that nurtures innovation. And the future cities you will help create need not feel claustrophobic or soulless.
By sculpting beautiful new forms into the city’s structures and landscapes; by incorporating light, plants, trees, water; by imagining new ways to connect with each other and work with each other, you will allow the coming crowd to live more richly, more meaningfully, than has ever been possible in history – and to do so without sacrificing your grandchildren.
Let me offer a few personal advices to you as you embark on your career. Everything from “one word: plastics”. to… “follow your dream, pursue your passion”. Indeed the mantra of romantically pursuing passion is hammered into us by countless movies, novels and pulp TV. I’m not convinced it is very good advice. Apart from the fact that many people aren’t sure what their passion is, even if they were, there are lots of wonderful things in life that absolutely should not be pursued directly. Take love. We all want it. But there’s a word for people who pursue love a little too directly. Stalker.
Or take happiness. Go after that wholeheartedly and most likely you’ll end up a hedonist, a narcissist, an addict. A great musician who wants to pursue the absolute in artistic creativity doesn’t get there by being creative. She gets there by being disciplined. By learning, listening and by practicing for hours… until one day the creativity just flows of its own accord.
Knowledge, discipline, generosity. If you pursue those with all the determination you possess, one day before too long, without you even knowing it, the chance to realize your most spectacular dreams will come gently tap you on the shoulder and whisper… let’s go. And you’ll be ready”. (end of quote)
Architects and engineering designers are not necessarily better than others in retaining any model fresh in the mind for any length of time. They are trained to transcribe their models on paper, or on any other medium, with details in two dimensions of various sections. The transcribed sections can be read to reconstitute the entire model at will.
Designing is a long process that involve studying and analysing people behaviors so that the end-product is useful, safe, and acceptable by the users. It is a shame if designers are not exposed to the human capabilities, limitations, and behaviors. It is a greater shame if any design is done for “art sake”, not taking into account the end users acceptance, even if the designer is rich enough not to design for monetary remuneration.
Power: Not a Point of View
Posted by: adonis49 on: March 10, 2009
Power: Not a Point of View (March 9, 2009)
Iran is planning to build 20 atomic power sites to generate electricity.
Russia has aided finishing the first power station for a cost exceeding one billion dollars. Iran is not only the fourth exporter of oil but has also huge reserves in oil and gas. And yet, Iran spends enormous amount of hard cash money to import oil products and gasoline from overseas refineries.
The Iranians are building a second atomic power generator, almost alone and strong with the expertise they acquired. The Iranian officials said that oil is a precious commodity that should not be wasted to generating dirty power.
The developed nations have oil reserves but prefer to purchase oil at a reduced price in order to save their oil resources for their chemical and pharmaceutical industries for later generations. (Actually, chemical industries rely almost exclusively on oil products.)
The Arab Gulf States have established “sovereign funds” for the next generations but they all have vanished during the latest economic and financial recession. What is left are highways and built stones.
I am exaggerating on purpose. This piece is meant to be a wake-up call. It is time to invest of the human potentials, social institutions, and political reforms.
Lebanon used to export electricity to Syria and Jordan in the 30’s during the French mandate. Presently, and 80 years later, and 65 years after its “independence”, Lebanon import electricity from Syria, Jordan, and Egypt. The populations of all these States have quadrupled in 80 years while Lebanon barely doubled, due to massive immigration, and we could not even double our power production.
Our neighboring States have reached sort of power sufficiency and exporting surplus electricity to Lebanon. Lebanon has plenty of water and rivers but we failed to invest properly on our natural resources and hydraulic potentials.
Not only we have not enough electricity, and none of it is hydraulically generated, but we have no running water. We receive water twice a week for a few hours and we have to filtrate and purify what we receive.
The Lebanese family has to pay twice for electrical power and for water by supplementing their needs from the scalpers of private providers. The main culprits are those “Christian” Maronite political parties who claimed that the power of Lebanon resides in its military weakness. Implicitly, those sectarian political parties meant that Lebanon should not challenge the dicta of Israel regarding our planning of our water resources.
Mind you that Israel purpose is to divert all our rivers toward its own Zionist State.
Electricity is a kind of power and oil and gas are essentials for locomotion and mechanization and industries. Nevertheless, nations are judged developed according to the level of their research institutions.
You might start the “egg or chicken” priority of security and stability first, but this is not the case. When States invest on almost everything except knowledge base and research institutions, then you should not hope for stability and security.
Developed nations respect States that focus their energies and resources on knowledge, literacy, and technologies and are willing to protect them from neighboring bullies.
Developed nations respect States that generate highly educated and well trained citizens regardless of size, origin, and natural resources.
Power is the level and quality of education, an education targeting the needs of the population and neighboring markets.
Power is no longer a point of view.