Adonis Diaries

Posts Tagged ‘racist ideology

Beyond clichés on “who is a poor”: How poverty can be vanquished? What are the battles facing poverty?

“If a progeny of young colored children (slaves) is brought forth, these are emancipated…”.  This statesman describes the  only way out of slavery condition during colonial periods.

It means that unless the kid of a slave family does not demonstrate mental abilities, skills, and potentials early on, the odd is that this kids will remain a slave…Change the word slave or colored children with “poor kid” and the meaning is the same.

“If a progeny of young Poor children is brought forth, these are emancipated to higher class systems…”  The concept of why someone is cataloged as poor is fundamentally related to this racist ideology, very prevalent even today, that a poor kid is mostly born lacking entrepreneurship abilities, characters for a sense of entitlement, education,…

A few new dimensions were added to the racial discrimination of “who is a poor” such as physical famished conditions, total lack of sanitation facilities…

Discourse on poverty has to bypass the “accepted” traditional clichés, such as viewing poverty as mainly related to famine, no access to direct financial aid, lack of healthcare facilities…

Unless the discourse on poverty is shifted to lack of education and early detection of “what’s wrong” with a baby, a community… there will be no pragmatic alternatives: Traditional public consciousness will end up guiding the non-performing policies and forms of aids…

Poverty cannot be resolved by adopting extreme ideological positions such as “pouring in massive financial aids in order to getting out of this trap…” as advanced by Jeffrey Sachs in “The end of Poverty”, or “aids do more harms than goods for the poor and we should correct and facilitate the forces of the market mechanisms…” as promoted by William Easterly in “The White man burden”

Solutions are not readily available by enhancing UN financial and political potentials, or curtailing liberal capitalism in the medium-term, or deposing despots and oligarchies…

Poverty is related and based on daily actions and activities of the masses.

Poverty eradication requires multiplying efficacious pragmatic programs supported by trained and caring personnel, willing to focus on identifying the problems and tending to the details, and having the courage and persistence to overcome the many daily problems, instead of slapping ready-made traditional solutions that do not correspond to the poverty problem.

Sure money can go a long way when used properly to priority pragmatic programs in education, healthcare, preventive medicine, sanitation, access to small enterprises, job opening…that produce fast positive effects, which do not need to wait for the Big Miracle of market “stimulation”

Sure, money can become a major barrier when not invested properly on projects not targeting essentially the most needy, through various administrative levels of waste, and squandering the good will and efforts of the workers

Any aid should be focused on the details of each program, no matter how long the process in the planning and study take…

It has been proven that educating “poor people” on the value of a facility is Not strictly monetary in nature.  For example, studies have demonstrated that those who received free mosquito nest used it as efficiently as those who could afford to pay for the nest…The usage of the mosquito nest was not as bad from both groups, even though the most poor had never used nest or believed it would make a difference…

The cost of massively offering free mosquito nests is insignificant to the expense of curing a few cases of malaria, polio, and many diseases transmitted by flees…

The contention that education is only efficacious when this need is reclaimed by parents and students is false.

The traditional schooling system is based on the pragmatic colonial exigencies in “colonial lands ” of quickly producing “elites” administrators and functionaries in the colonies.  Consequently, this schooling system focused on the brightest 10% students and ignored the remaining students who ended up dropping pretty fast or not learning anything…

This trend has reinforced the concept with the parents that “If my kid is not showing interest in learning, it is much better to take him out and get him working early on…Either you get the jack pot in education with a promising kid or education is a total waste of time and money…”

Another false concept says: “If there are no job market after the learning period, it is of no use wasting time and money on national education system…”

Fact is, the more the masses learn, the more job openings are created in the market:  The masses will adopt the necessary pressures for alternative political and economic policies…

Fact is, it is not enough to send kids to “school concentration camps“:  while in school, the kid has to learn something. at least learn to read, write and do basic math…

Teaching means enhancing the reflective power in kids, extending to them a sense of entitlement to negotiating with authority (like the teachers, the administrators…), and encouraging kids to be patient in solving problems: The longer time is spent on resolving a problem the easier the learning matter will be approached such as in math, writing, reading...

It is far less expensive in the long-term to focus on every student’s needs and potentials than pouring in money on scoring standard tests and bonuses to teachers and “performing” schools…

If the policy is to educate and train well the teachers, and institute a culture that teaching is the highest prestige in a community, and allow more than one teachers to tend to small classrooms, you’ll reap an educated citizen.

The education system in Finland does not take seriously test scores until way later in secondary higher levels.  Thousands apply to teaching positions and competition is harsh within this culture where teachers are the most respected, although not paid as highly as in other countries…

It is obvious that educated parents have assimilated the precept that preventive medicine programs (like early vaccination…) are far superior to the expensive hospital treatments.  Actually, many poor families forget or don’t take seriously preventative programs, and thus, in developed States, vaccination programs are made obligatory because the States can afford the programs and have the proper trained medical personnel.

In developing countries, forced health preventive programs are not applicable, simply for lack of resources in money, personnel, and medical facilities…

The irony is that in India, parents are refusing polio vaccination.  Why?  

The parents didn’t forget or forgive the Indian government lies for practicing in the 80’s  secret sterilization programs under false vaccination programs

As the feeling of security and safety are the most basic needs in individuals, education is the most basic building block for human development indicators and programs.

Without a sense of security and safety within a family and extended community, the individual will be constantly worried for his daily bread to survive…

Without a vast primary and secondary schooling system accessible and affordable to all, the society will be constantly facing daily survival problems, with no light at the end of the tunnel.

Note:  This post was inspired by an interview of Sophie Fay with Esther Duflo in the French weekly magazine “Le novel observateur“.

Esther Duflo is professor at MIT, has published “Rethinking poverty“.  She had published “Human development”, and “The politics of autonomy“.

“Sophie’s World” on Indo-European and Semitic civilizations; (Dec. 15, 2009)

Since the 19th century, European “nations” have been trying to set up a “coherent” racist ideology, disguised as “civilization difference”, to supporting their colonial expansions.

Thus, many European “elites” of philosophers and “thinkers” fabricated the Indo-European civilization in order to have any kind of fictitious basis to distinguish themselves from the “non-European” people. Ironically, the author Jostein Gaarder seems absolutely convinced with this fictitious story.

First and obviously, as an axiom or evident proposition, the Europeans had the best civilization. Thus, the antithesis was that the Semitic and other “Chinese sort” of civilizations were lumped at the other extreme end.

Second and obviously, Semitic civilization had to be fabricated in order to satisfy Hegel theory of dialectical processes of history for human knowledge development.

Third, the European nations had no purpose to reaching any synthesis among civilizations: They were on a war path to dominate, win, and prove the superiority of their “Indo-European civilization”.

Actually, the civil wars in Europe and the USA always ended with a victor regardless of cost, trauma, and casualties such as the civil wars in the USA, Spain, England, and France. In non-European cultures, civil wars end with no clear-cut winner in the short-term.

In China, the communists and “nationalists” signed a truce to confront the occupying Japanese. India civil war between Hindus and Moslems ended after its independence with the third of the population remaining Moslems, even though Pakistan was created for repatriating Moslems to that new State.

In Lebanon, 17 years of civil war ended with all factions losing, and their leaders appointed deputies and members in the successive governments. (that is the worst ending for any nation).

The story goes that four thousand years ago, primitive people concentrated in the Caucasus region around the Black Sea (the actual States of Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Chechnya…). They immigrated westward to central and north Europe and also eastward to Iran and India.

In the Arabic Peninsula, there were tribal people who immigrated to Syria, Iraq, Egypt, and North Africa and are called Semitic. (Now, why people would settle in arid desert land or in high mountain chains in order to survive? It looks like this rational question was beside the point. We know that people settle in mild weather regions rich in water resources, and they immigrate to God forsaken regions to flee persecutions. This logical question seems also beside the point to the Indo-European ideology).  Let us move on.

On religion: Indo-European civilization believed in a variety of Gods (this was true with the Semitic category, but facts had to be altered to suit the dichotomy method).

In the original Indian language of Sanskrit the celestial God Dyaus was transferred into Zeus, Jupiter (Jov-pater), and Tyr (for the Nordic people). (Can you show me any resemblance in phonetics?).  The Viking God Aser was transformed from Sanskrit Asura and Persian Ahura; (What about Ashur that was adopted in Babylon and the Near East or Ashtarut?)

Another example, in Latin we have Deus and in Old Norse Tivurr which were transformed from the Sanskrit Deva and the Persian Daevra; (should I continue with this masquerade of God’s names?)

(Consequently, Semitic civilization must believe in one God. Trinity is thus the creation of the Greco-Roman culture for altering Christianity initial dogma.  Allah or El was the supreme God, even though He didn’t generated money from the worshipers who dedicated their money to their more practical and pragmatic local business Gods.)

On myths: There are stories on immortal potions, struggle of the Gods against monsters of chaos, the subject playing a drama in which forces of Good and Evil confront one another in a relentless struggle, predicting the Good to win. For example, the Indo-European civilization, specifically the Greek, have tendencies to speculate on how to view the world (philosophy); they have “insight” into the history of the world and the concept of “cosmic vision”.

Thus, vision (the seeing sense) was the most important among the senses and images of Gods in pictures, and sculptures were predominantly used to honor the Gods. (Gaarder must have forgotten that “cosmic vision” is the realm of nomads in deserts, where stars appear close to hand reach.)  Indo-European civilization view history as cyclical, just like seasons; (what kinds of seasons they have up north? I thought there are long winters and a very short stuffy summers.)

Consequently, Semitic civilization had to rely on hearing or the auditory sense.  For example: “Hear, O Israel (Land of El)” or “Thus spake Jehovah”, or “In the beginning was the word”.  Why?

Because tribes relayed their culture verbally by repetitive story telling.  As if the Nordic people didn’t rely on the verbal (could they write a thousand years ago and had they documented their culture?). No matter, since the Greek learned to write then the ideology stands viable.

Anyway, since the Semitic must be in the auditory realm of the senses, then images of God in pictures and sculptures had to be prohibited for the western racist ideologies to take roots.

On after death: Transmission of the soul in Indo-Europe culture is cyclical, the soul is transferred to new-born and the ultimate purpose of life is for the soul to be released from this infernal cycle. .Thus, for the Semitic civilization, history must be linear and that is why they were preoccupied recording history!

God created the world and it will end with the Judgment Day. Thus, there is a distance between God and his creation so that Semitic believers were to be redeemed from their sins by prayers, and the study of the scriptures rather than by self-communion and meditation as Indo-European behave!

Can we propose that Hegel’s theory of dialectical processes of history for human knowledge development had set the stage for western superiority ideology, the re-writing of history to suit the feable minded philosophers and politicians?




September 2020

Blog Stats

  • 1,419,374 hits

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by

Join 771 other followers

%d bloggers like this: