It’s No Myth:
Robots and Artificial Intelligence Will Erase Jobs in Nearly Every Industry
With the unemployment rate falling to 5.3 percent, the lowest in seven years, policy makers are heaving a sigh of relief. (Every time these short terms sighs of relief to fool the people)
Indeed, with the technology boom in progress, there is a lot to be optimistic about.
Manufacturing will be returning to U.S. shores with robots doing the job of Chinese workers;
American carmakers will be mass-producing self-driving electric vehicles;
technology companies will develop medical devices that greatly improve health and longevity;
we will have unlimited clean energy and 3D print our daily needs.
The cost of all of these things will plummet and make it possible to provide for the basic needs of every human being.
(No sweat hoping. And what of the people who needs a job?)
I am talking about technology advances that are happening now, which will bear fruit in the 2020s. (How about in 50 years if no major calamities hit us before then?)
But policy makers will have a big new problem to deal with: the disappearance of human jobs.
Not only will there be fewer jobs for people doing manual work, the jobs of knowledge workers will also be replaced by computers.
(So even educated people will have no jobs?)
Almost every industry and profession will be impacted and this will create a new set of social problems — because most people can’t adapt to such dramatic change. (Why should they?)
If we can develop the economic structures necessary to distribute the prosperity we are creating (here we go again), most people will no longer have to work to sustain themselves. They will be free to pursue other creative endeavors (assuming that the opportunities are there?
The problem is that without jobs, they will not have the dignity, social engagement, and sense of fulfillment that comes from work.
The life, liberty and pursuit of happiness that the constitution entitles us to won’t be through labor, it will have to be through other means. (How about we start thinking of these other means?)
It is imperative that we understand the changes that are happening and find ways to cushion the impacts.
The technology elite who are leading this revolution will reassure you that there is nothing to worry about because we will create new jobs just as we did in previous centuries when the economy transitioned from agrarian to industrial to knowledge-based. (kids were working in the mining industries, in tunnels deep inside the bowel of earth)
Tech mogul Marc Andreessen has called the notion of a jobless future a “Luddite fallacy,” referring to past fears that machines would take human jobs away. Those fears turned out to be unfounded because we created newer and better jobs and were much better off. (Please expand on these new jobs and their cumulative trauma disorders)
True, we are living better lives. But what is missing from these arguments is the timeframe over which the transitions occurred.
The industrial revolution unfolded over centuries. Today’s technology revolutions are happening within years.
We will surely create a few intellectually-challenging jobs, but we won’t be able to retrain the workers who lose today’s jobs.
The working people will experience the same unemployment and despair that their forefathers did. It is they who we need to worry about. (Which means 6 billion people?)
The first large wave of unemployment will be caused by self-driving cars. (if the technology is here, who in his right head will give up control over the car?)
These will provide tremendous benefit by eliminating traffic accidents and congestion, making commuting time more productive, and reducing energy usage. But they will eliminate the jobs of millions of taxi and truck drivers and delivery people.
Fully-automated robotic cars are no longer in the realm of science fiction; you can see Google’s cars on the streets of Mountain View, Calif. There are also self-driving trucks on our highways (they should be banned) and self-driving tractors on farms.
Uber just hired away dozens of engineers from Carnegie Mellon University to build its own robotic cars. It will surely start replacing its human drivers as soon as its technology is ready — later in this decade (And give away the profit it is amassing by hiring drivers?).
As Uber CEO Travis Kalanick reportedly said in an interview, “The reason Uber could be expensive is you’re paying for the other dude in the car. When there is no other dude in the car, the cost of taking an Uber anywhere is cheaper. Even on a road trip. (Assuming the clients will prefer Not having this dude on the wheel)”
The dude in the driver’s seat will go away.
Manufacturing will be the next industry to be transformed.
Robots have, for many years, been able to perform surgery, milk cows, do military reconnaissance and combat, and assemble goods. But they weren’t dexterous enough to do the type of work that humans do in installing circuit boards.
The latest generation of industrial robots by ABB of Switzerland and Rethink Robotics of Boston can do this however. ABB’s robot, Yumi, can even thread a needle. It costs only $40,000.
China, fearing the demise of its industry, is setting up fully-automated robotic factories in the hope that by becoming more price-competitive, it can continue to be the manufacturing capital of the world.
But its advantage only holds up as long as the supply chains are in China and shipping raw materials and finished goods over the oceans remains cost-effective.
Don’t forget that our robots are as productive as theirs are; they too don’t join labor unions (yet) and will work around the clock without complaining.
Supply chains will surely shift and the trickle of returning manufacturing will become a flood.
But there will be few jobs for humans once the new, local factories are built.
With advances in artificial intelligence, any job that requires the analysis of information can be done better by computers. This includes the jobs of physicians, lawyers, accountants, and stock brokers.
We will still need some humans to interact with the ones who prefer human contact, but the grunt work will disappear. The machines will need very few humans to help them.
This jobless future will surely create social problems — but it may be an opportunity for humanity to uplift itself. (That is the biggest lie that has been perpetrated this century)
Why do we need to work 40, 50, or 60 hours a week, after all? Just as we were better off leaving the long and hard agrarian and factory jobs behind, we may be better off without the mindless work at the office.
What if we could be working 10 or 15 hours per week from anywhere we want and have the remaining time for leisure, social work, or attainment of knowledge?
Yes, there will be a booming tourism and recreation industry and new jobs will be created in these — for some people. (Assuming the money are there for these entertainment)
There are as many things to be excited about as to fear.
If we are smart enough to develop technologies that solve the problems of disease, hunger, energy, and education, we can — and surely will — develop solutions to our social problems. (Then why famine is still harvesting millions of people?)
But we need to start by understanding where we are headed and prepare for the changes.
We need to get beyond the claims of a Luddite fallacy — to a discussion about the new future.
Vivek Wadhwa is a fellow at Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University, director of research at Center for Entrepreneurship and Research Commercialization at Duke, and distinguished fellow at Singularity University.
His past appointments include Harvard Law School, University of California Berkeley, and Emory University. Follow him on Twitter @wadhwa.
Adonis Diaries 