Posts Tagged ‘scare tactics’
Has Power the mission of Modifying the rank order of natural passions?
Posted by: adonis49 on: March 23, 2021
Scare Tactics: The Austin Texas case
Posted on April 24, 2009
A reader commented on one of my posts and informed me that the US government and police force have invented a “machine” that can modify human behavior, invade individual privacy, and control our daily habits without having to bring citizens to interrogation.
He went on to say that everyone in Austin Texas know about this machine.
Any individual or institutional power such as executive, legislative, legal, press, media, religion, financial, or economic multinational enterprise has ultimately one purpose: modifying human behavior to coincide with a set priority of natural passions for a period of time that suit the environmental and social conditions.
Strong institutions who hold real power are Not necessarily that impressed of your “free” opinions or how informed are the public. Their goal is to keep the people in a passive state and waiting for directives and guidelines through thousands of subtle means that they have total control over.
What worry most the power-to-be are people on the move. They don’t care if this movement is within the right direction of their wishes and desires: they are simply scared of active citizens marching on because the end result cannot be controlled or forecasted.
That is why in critical periods of unrest, because of financial or economical difficulties, the government and its various branches rely on rumors that insinuate that the government is in complete power of control over the behavior of their citizens.
This fear technique works most of the time to cow the public into passive status.
Karl Jasper wrote in his book “The German Culpability”: “The one who remained passive knows that he is morally guilty every time he failed to respond to an action for protecting the threatened citizens, for reducing injustice, and for resisting infamy”
I think the reader is confusing predictive models of human behavior with models for evaluating the performance of behavior modifications.
Institutions of power know how to modify behavior for a period, which is their main power. Institutions sublet research institutions of “scientists” in statistical design, survey, poll taking, quantitative psychologists, social scientists, political “analysts”, and so forth to present models that would corroborate the desires of the fund givers.
The “professional” scientists with many grants under their belt, know how to tamper and adjust models to be biased toward the wishes of the power fund granters.
Generally, the power institutions are more astute and fool the scientists more often than not, but it is a game that the scientist learn to grasp and play in due time.
I doubt that any model for predicting human behavior can outperform the odds of a coin flipping mechanism. What the models are predicting are the behavior of a restricted sample of people who were subjected with modification treatments, by subtle means unknown to them, but obviously known by the authorities.
No, the Austin TX. “machine” is a scare tactics disseminated by people who were worked upon. This is the time to get on the move and be vocal and active.
If this terrible machine is invading individual privacy, then an investigative panel with wide power should be constituted to deliver weekly reports on its findings and progress.
The government policies are to present the image of omnipresence and omnipotent.
Almost all religions are practically copy/paste of previous ones, with small editing
Posted by: adonis49 on: July 18, 2019
Almost all religions are practically copy/paste of previous ones, with small editing
Note 1: Let’s start from the end, shall we? Almost all religions are practically copy/paste of previous ones, with small editing to correspond to the myths, stories, customs and tradition of the society it was disseminated within, before going universal, once power was secured.
Notes 2: this article is a re-editing of a previous post written on May 15, 2008.: Foundations and history of the monolithic religions
Discovering the mysteries of life and the Universe might not be attainable: for the simple reason that any paradigm would not stick long enough to capture the mind of a few generations.
This article is intended for those who accept the validity of the hypothesis that
- Earth is billions years old and that a form of mankind emerged, at least more than a couple millions years ago;
- That human kind was on the verge of extinction several times, due to drastic climatic changes and the eruption of monster volcanoes.
Thus, prior civilizations, which may have been as developed as today, could have vanished with no traces left.
We need to accept the fact that if the number of the world population was far less than it should have been at the beginning of the 19th century, from simple mathematical computation in the last 2,000 years, it is because most of our ancestors were the product of incest and Not from couples of different families or tribes, even after accounting for the casualties of wars, pestilence, famine and climate calamities.
I also would like to state that mythologies were based on real events and the transmitted verbal stories accounted for their longevity: the verbal communication of these stories extended the imagination and gave the various mythologies the religious power and the dimension that are interpreted nowadays.
When dealing with religions, people feel the need to contrast faith versus facts and logic.
People who have sincere faith must have experienced supernatural revelations or gone through a moment of irrational state of out-of-body exposure.
I believe that faith cannot be acquired by reason or logic and those who repeat frequently the word “truth” in their conversations are not sincere in their belief system because truth is plainly, simply and absolutely a subjective attitude: It means “do not bother using facts, science or logic. All those reasoning principles do not mean a thing and would not change my mind”.
Truth is for me the most dangerous term that man has invented: Truth blocks any consensus or negotiation or meaningful conversation and it connotes an extremist disposition based on ignorance and lack of intellectual interactions.
Thus, the concept of truth is practically opposite to faith, although people positively correlate it with faith.
Logic is a construct, a system of the mind used to expose a coherent hypothesis, hopefully based on some facts, or a story that hold a convincing alternative. Logic can be used in science, in rhetoric and as well in religion.
Institutionalized religions heavily make use of logic, though they hammer out the concept of faith because its concept is not founded on anything tangible or can be proved rationally.
Religion is basically a theological philosophy that has been manipulated to be grounded in myths, symbols, and secrecy to satisfy the initiated High Priests and generates its power through scare tactics within the psychic of man.
Let me offer a logical story, one of the alternative stories, of the monotheist religions of the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim religions.
The root of these three religions is the religion practiced in the Kingdom of Sumer, in southern Iraq, 6,000 years ago. This ancient religion believed in a trinity and its mythology stated that out of space creatures, arriving from the tenth dying planet, landed on earth to exploit gold and oil because the environment of their planet required abundant quantities of gold to be pulverized and injected in their outer atmosphere to rejuvenate the deteriorating environment of their planet. (Sound that saving the degradation of earth environment might require another drastic mythological story)
These creatures created human artificially (test tube for example) to serve as cheap and mechanical slaves in the mines.
After many centuries, the created human revolted against their masters and fled from the Eden of the super cruel creatures and had to fend for themselves to survive and develop their intelligence.
The Kingdom of Sumer and its far developed civilization that discovered the existence of ten planets (there is nine in our solar system so far, and lately this year the tenth planet was discovered) and their rotations; the Sumerians divided the day into 24 hours, the hours into minutes and minutes into seconds.
Ancient mythologies mention that this kingdom was destroyed by a natural calamity (resembling to an atomic explosion used by the outer space creatures).
The Sumerian mythology had ramifications into all the neighboring civilizations that came after it, when it was weakened.
Jewish “scholars” in 200 BC in Alexandria (Egypt) assembled faked stories and borrowed many myths in orde rto attach a faked history to their tribes. For examples:
It is narrated that Abraham left the Kingdom of Sumer with his tribe during a period of famine and carried with him the verbal mythology of the country.
Moses was a High Priest in Egypt and fled persecution because he adhered to the Akhenaton new religion of the one God the Sun and carried with him the ten laws and the secrets of the Egyptian religion.
Jesus was initiated by the Essen sect (indirectly related to Jewish religion), located in upper Galilee by Mount Carmel and had their Great Temple on the Mount.
The members of the Essen sect believed in knowledge and spirituality and shared the resources in common.
It is also narrated that Jesus lived for a time in Sidon (Saida) in this Lebanese southern City-State, teaching in its famous law school. Mary, his mother and part of her family were from the town of Qana (closer to the main port of Tyr that was the administrative district of Upper Galilee) and lived there when Jesus was a lecturer in the law school.
It is no fluke of an incident that Jesus and Mary attended a wedding in Qana; it is also very rational that Jesus decided to start his message after Qana when his mother removed the cover of secrecy and exposed his supernatural gifts of turning water to wine.
Jesus was a high priest in the Essen sect and preached a message based in symbolism and fables and was highly spiritual and staunchly anti-Pharisee, this Jewish sect that believed that adhering to the Laws was sufficient to be saved.
The Jewish Cabala sect is a branch of the Essen sect and is founded on the Sumerian theology and myths.
Albert Schweitzer, a theologian, physician, thinker, organ player and Nobel Peace laureate offered his version on Jesus. He said, based on the first two testaments of Mathew and Marc, that Jesus preached his message to the general public in the last year before his crucifixion.
Just six months, all in all, Jesus was accompanied by the public and the remaining months he spent them among his close disciple around Caesarea of Philippi.
In the beginning, Jesus accepted the label of a prophet among the prophets but then he reached the belief that he is the Messiah of the Jews.
Thus, he sent his disciples two by two to preach the message of the end of time (as all monolithic religions claim). Jesus was very surprised when all his disciples returned safe and sound; he expected his disciples to suffer terribly and be put to death in order for the prophesy to be accomplished.
Jesus then decided that God would accept his sacrifice and save his close disciples from atrocious deaths before the first coming of the Messiah.
The apostles and disciples of Jesus believed that Christ would return to Jerusalem during their life time, and thus they stayed in Jerusalem for as long as they could before they were forced to leave that city out of persecution by the Jews.
The Christian-Jews would not relinquish the Jewish Laws and they harassed and even persecuted St. Paul for preaching to the gentiles and establishing Christian communities based on faith in Christ who came to absolve our sins and who was resurrected from death.
St. Paul insisted that without the belief that Christ resurrected there would be no foundations for Christianity. That is true because Christianity would be another extremist and salafist Orthodox Jewish sect.
The Council of Nicea in 325 adopted only four out of the hundreds of testaments that were written, and which accounted for more credible eye-witness testimonies before four testaments were adopted as Not apocryphal (teaching of wisdom).
The authors of the four testaments were biased toward the message of their respective gurus.
For example, Marc followed Paul for a while and then he proselytized with Peter and wrote the biography of Peter.
Lucas stuck with Paul for the longest parts of his trips and the foundations of Christian communities.
The Talmudic Mathew outdid himself forcing the genealogy of Jesus to descend from David.
The educated Jean was of a noble family and wrote his testament when he was already senile at the age of 95; he had acquired the Hellenistic culture and symbolism.
It is unfortunate that Jean had to write the apocalyptic hallucination that is wrecking havoc at the beginning of every millennium. Apparently, the apocalypse is not from the same Jean the disciple.
The Arab Prophet Mohammad was not illiterate and he was initiated to the Jewish-Christian sect (the Ebionites) located in Mecca with his uncle as Patriarch of the sect.
Mohammad read the Books and listened to the proselytism of the Eastern Christian sects during his caravan commerce to and within Syria.
These Christian sects believed in the mono-physism of Jesus (No divine spiritual identity), in contrast to other monophysist sects that believed Jesus was spiritual, for example the Orthodox Church of Byzantium. These Eastern churches staunchly adhered to the Jewish Laws, the Jewish prophets and their books.
Consequently, the religion of Mohammad during its first 13 years was almost a duplicate of these Eastern Christian sects with strong Jewish foundations in their religions.
At that period of his message, Mohammad had decreed that Muslims should face toward Jerusalem for prayer. When Mohammad had to fight the Jewish tribes in Yathreb he changed the direction for prayer to facing Al Ka3ba (the Black Stone) in Mecca.
Mohammad had to flee to Medina after the Kureich tribe decided to terminate him; he then endeavored to establish firmly his community of Muslims in Yathreb (Medina).
The next phase of taking up the civil social responsibilities and politics for maintaining this community forced upon Mohammad to linking the spiritual dogma with the civil laws and regulations.
It was while strengthening the community of Islam in Medina that Mohammad had to wage many wars against a few Jewish communities who ended siding with Mohammad’s archenemy, the Kureich tribe in Mecca.
Mohammad thus learned to discriminate between the practices of the Jews and the Jewish religion and hundreds of Jews were displaced.
After Mohammad showed clemency twice with Jewish rebellions, he finally ordered the beheading of 700 members of the Jewish Khyber tribe. For some reason, Mohammad selected his nephew and son-in-law Ali to have the honor of the decapitation; it is no wonder that the Jews have an animal hatred for Ali and his followers.
To comprehend the nature of Islam it would be beneficial to collect the revealed verses before relocating to Yathreb or Medina.
Most of the verses generated in Medina were generally rules and laws designed for managing the daily lives of the believers. You will realize that most of these laws are identical to the desert and Bedouin customs of the Jews before and long after they got established in Palestine.
Personal hypothesis:
The ancestor of all the Gods that were created since antiquity is this scary total Silence before a coming major natural cataclysm. It is the silence of death when the whole earth is still and the atmosphere suffocating, no breezes of any kinds, that generates in all living creature a terrible reaction of wholesome anger, of pure revolt against the sense of death in this universal silence.
It is the silence and quietude before tornadoes, cyclones, sand desert storms and all the kinds of whirling at great magnitude in the atmosphere, the seas, deserts and the bowel of earth in volcanoes.
There is no avoiding the silence of coming cataclysms as there is no avoiding death, a correlation that people noticed and prayed for their own God of Total Silence to keep chatting through winds, birds, animals, rains, thunderstorms, shouting, crying and anything that can be heard, lest miseries, devastation and evil spirits hovering over the land befall their region.
The same behavior is applied to the starting of wars and their ending.
It is no wonder that men shout stupid songs, curse loudly at fictional enemies like if drunk, bang on batteries and metals, light and heavy metals, blow on air instruments and all the hysterical trepidation at the announcement of a major war, an ancient psychic custom within our deepest pre-historic brain to ward off the cataclysm wrapped into maddening songs of patriotism and cursing at the evil enemies.
Indeed, heavy silence is the root of our fundamental fear, and dealing with fear should pass through learning to accept silence as a necessary step to investigating our soul.
Note 3: The Catholic religion, and most of its offshoots, were extremist and bloody organizations during most of their history. They were too the primary weapons in colonizing and subjugating other people.
Note 4: Every time, anyone of these monolithic sects mentions the faked stories in the “Bible”, they are providing ammunition to the Zionist movement and its head, creator and financier the western colonial powers.
Pentagon Warns: ” Expect “Radical” Change In US Government Soon…?” Pretty funny
Posted by: adonis49 on: October 11, 2013
Pentagon Warns: ” Expect “Radical” Change In US Government Soon…”
As if the US political system is reverting to a new, reformed and revamped Communist features: The communism of the 21st century…
Scare tactics to drive the US citizens from reflecting reasonably on the changing times…
Simply because the US fiscal policies need to reflect the changing economic environment and recurring recessions as a result of the outmoded and uncontrollable capitalist system that the US and colonial powers were adopting for their growth at the expense of the rest of the world…
A highly troubling “urgent bulletin” issued earlier today by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) states that it has received information from the Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) warning to expect a “radical change” in the government of the United States, possibly within the next fortnight, based on information they have received from “highly placed” sources within the Pentagon.
Truth Channel posted this Oct. 8, 2013 “URGENT WARNING: Pentagon Warns To Expect “Radical” Change In US Government Soon”. I’m reposting this one of the top posts on wordpress.com with minor editing.
According to this MoFA bulletin, GRU intelligence assesses were notified by their Pentagon counterparts this past week that President Barack Obama is preparing to invoke the powers given to him under 50 USC Chapter 13 to hold that various American States are now in a “state of insurrection” , allowing him to invoke the National Emergencies Act under 50 USC § 1621 and invoke the highly controversial “continuity of government” plan for the United States that will let him rule with supreme powers.
Specifically, this bulletin says, Obama will invoke 50 USC § 212 that states: “ the President shall have declared by proclamation that the laws of the United States are opposed, and the execution thereof obstructed, by combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings”
The specific laws being opposed by these “combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings,” that Obama will outline in his reasoning’s for declaring a state of emergency, this bulletin continues, are the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), otherwise known as Obamacare.
The NDAA is opposed by many US States, this bulletin says, with California joining Alaska and Virginia this past week in passing a law making it illegal to be enforced in their territory, and with many other States, also, preparing to do the same.
The specific portions of the NDAA law being opposed by these US States allows for the indefinite detention without charges or trial of all American citizens and allows for their assassination should Obama order it.
The PPACA (Obamacare) law is, likewise, opposed by over half of the US States and has led to an American “shutdown” this past week that has closed 15% of their government, but has left fully 85% of it still open.
To the specific “combinations too powerful” Obama will cite in his declaration of National Emergency as being needed to be defeated by extraordinary measures, the MoFA says, is a faction of the US House of Representatives popularly known as the Republican Tea Party whom the President and his allies have likened to “hostage takers” and “political terrorists.”
Obama’s greatest fear, and reason(s) for declaring a National State of Emergency, this bulletin continues, was outlined yesterday by his US Treasury Department who released a report yesterday warning of potentially “catastrophic” damage should Congress fail to raise the debt ceiling and prevent the government from defaulting on its debt.
As the current US government shutdown crisis and debt ceiling fight have now merged, the MoFA warns in this bulletin, Obama further warned yesterday that an impasse on the debt ceiling beyond 17 October, when the US government will be essentially out of cash to pay its bills, could start a downward economic plunge worse than the recession of 5 years ago – with credit markets seizing up, the dollar’s value plummeting and US interest rates soaring and even coming close to the brink of such an unprecedented default that could roil both domestic and foreign financial markets.
Preparing to oppose Obama declare a National State of Emergency, the GRU grimly warns, is the US military who themselves are preparing to invoke 50 USC § 842 which allows them to protect America from “The Communist Party of the United States, or any successors of such party regardless of the assumed name, whose object or purpose is to overthrow the Government of the United States, or the government of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof…”
Not known to many Americans is that the Progressive movement Obama belongs to, and whose media acolyte “presstitutes” swept into office, have long been associated with the Communist Party.
And, as the World Net Daily News Service reported this past August, John C. Drew, Ph.D., the award-winning political scientist, met Obama in 1980 and wrote in 2011: “[Obama] believed that the economic stresses of the Carter years meant revolution was still imminent. The election of Reagan was simply a minor set-back in terms of the coming revolution. … Obama was blindly sticking to the simple Marxist theory … ‘there’s going to be a revolution.’ Obama said, ‘we need to be organized and grow the movement.’ In Obama’s view, our role must be to educate others so that we might usher in more quickly this inevitable revolution.”
With Obama’s “revolution” now at hand, the GRU warns in this bulletin, it is critical to note that that United States, unlike other nations, have all of their elected officials and military personal swear allegiance to the US Constitution, and not to their government or its leaders.
The most recent example of this conflict between Obama and the US military, the GRU further states, was in Egypt when the Obama regime supported Muslim Brotherhood was overthrown by the Pentagon backed Egyptian military, and who, like the United States, makes its political and military leaders swear allegiance to their constitution, not to any of its leaders.
As many in America now know that these present times are not the normal activities of a government seeking peace and prosperity, and as dozens of undisclosed Obama Presidential directives that define US national security policy and task government agencies are still unknown either to the public or, as a rule, to the US Congress, this bulletin warns in its summation that with each passing day American can be more likened to a communist dictatorship than a functioning democracy.
So bad, in fact, has the United States become that one of its legendary reporters, Pulitzer Prize winner Seymour Hersh wrote this past week that the Obama administration lies systematically yet none of the leviathans of American media, the TV networks or big print titles, challenge him.
Even worse, and in a further Sovietization of American Life by the Obama regime, the US this past week refused to grant entry visas to internationally renowned authors Ilija Trojanov and Ernst Titovets who were invited to speak at conferences, and which Justin Raimondo of the highly respected Antiwar.com blog calls “part of a disturbing pattern of repression that all points to one ineluctable conclusion: the United States is the Soviet Union of the new millennium – an ideological state with global ambitions that holds itself up as the epitome of “freedom” and yet is the single most powerful enemy of liberty worldwide.”
Filtering knowledge: Danger
Posted by: adonis49 on: April 29, 2010
Filtering knowledge: Danger;
You have got no excuses anymore to shoulder individual responsibility and acquire knowledge: Public schools are available in most States and the internet is open to everyone for information, facts, and methods in most fields of studies and for varied hobbies.
There are calls to start filtering and controlling this mass of information on the net for untenable reasons that are meant to hide the real frightening reality that is weakening the hold of central powers and multinational institutions on the kinds of knowledge we should be learning.
There are scare tactics originating from central powers that at best 50% of information and facts are not accurate or downright misleading.
Keep in mind that before the net, even a small portion of “accurate” news and information was not available to the general public: they were hidden in locked up archives or dusty sections of public libraries.
If you believe that only China and Saudi Arabia are intent on filtering information then you are being fooled big time.
The so-called democratic States are doing the filtering and control of information camouflaged under financial difficulties: large mergers into a few multinational networks capable of efficient control in times of “national emergencies “are permitted in critical sectors of the economy.
Up until the last two decades, people everywhere were subjected to culture filtered by organizations allied to central powers, supposedly most compatible to the civilization of a particular people.
Up to the 18th century, this control and culture filtering was easily feasible: schools were rare, illiteracy was high, and the printing of works was very expensive for common people to learn and continue their education.
Billions of students have no access to viable libraries or inexpensive updated books and their only bet is the availability of Internet for global knowledge.
I am no longer reading to acquire more knowledge or to be considered a cultured man.
I read to revisit topics and compare my outmoded knowledge with current facts and methods and then having the pleasure to synthesize the topic, dump the useless and archaic knowledge in the waste bin and keeping the refreshed updated knowledge.
The best method for this process is to write on topics and disseminate them and then re-edit what you disseminated as an ongoing process.
We are living longer but not necessarily benefiting from longevity.
Older people have to be reminded by action that they have plenty of potentials to contribute to society and to improve their capabilities. The best catalyst to keep up the good work is to find a way to disseminate your new outlooks so that you get updated with comments and counterpoints to go the extra mile into frequent updating of your knowledge.
What’s the use of living to be a hundred if you lost hope in your potential as a valid individual when you reach retirement age?
It is not acquiring a caravan and driving around the land that is of any proof that you still got the zest for life.
Now, if you capture new trends and new cultures, then synthesize what you capture with your outdated memory stores, comparing what you know and what is changing then you are developing potentials.
I have plenty of knowledge that may not interest people or is that useful to my own survival.
One good alternative for my knowledge to become more useful to many people and to keeping my senility at bay is to write and transmit knowledge through the process of revisiting, reworking, and synthesizing knowledge, filtering incoming information and packaging it as new knowledge so that I copy my upgraded and re-edited knowledge into other medium.
Re-editing knowledge is an intelligent overhauling and updating to newer challenges.
The job of investing energy to synthesizing your knowledge is called culture exploration. The best way to undertaking this job is to read all kinds of manuscripts, select what is of interest to you, select what you judge is of importance to the newer generations, and to becoming better discriminator in culture and civilization.
Within our individual responsibilities and as part of quality of life I suggest the following:
First, if you are a graduate professional then, in addition to publishing in professional blogs, do create a popular blog and disseminate your knowledge in layman terms with explanation of the professional terminologies. I have in mind all those empiricists and experimenters in natural, human, and social sciences.
Second, if you are an expert in any kinds of hobbies then, do create a popular blog to disseminate your excitement. It might turn out that your hobby is your best alternative “gold mine” by unconditionally your enthusiasm. The more you share the more demands for your skills and knowledge and the more money will ultimately generate.
Third, your best protection from early senility and atrophy of your brain is to invest time and energy in synthesizing and comparing new knowledge and challenges with your archaic memory stores. The more you discharge your overcrowded useless information the more youthful your quality of life.
Read, assimilate, compare, synthesize and disseminate accurate updated knowledge. This is a new hobby available to every reflecting individual. You have no excuses for failing this responsibility.
A golden opportunity is now available to developing mankind moral and emotional potentials in these challenging times of hopelessness toward the fast degradation of earth and the growing impotency of the United Nations.
Time to upgrade knowledge into useful discernment of accrued challenges.
Scare Tactics: The Austin case
Posted by: adonis49 on: April 24, 2009
Scare Tactics: The Austin case
Power: Modifying the order ranking of natural passions (April 22, 2009)
A reader commented on one of my posts and informed me that the US government and police force have invented a “machine” that can modify human behavior, invade individual privacy, and control our daily habits without having to bring citizens to interrogation. He went on to say that everyone in Austin TX know about this machine.
Any individual or institutional power such as executive, legislative, legal, press, media, religion, financial, or economic multinational enterprise has ultimately one purpose: modifying human behavior to coincide with a set priority of natural passions for a period of time that suit the environmental and social conditions.
Strong institutions who hold real power are not necessarily that impressed of your “free” opinions or how informed are the public. Their goal is to keep the people in a passive state and waiting for directives and guidelines through thousands of subtle means that they have total control over.
What worry most the power-to-be are people on the move. They don’t care if this movement is within the right direction of their wishes and desires; they are simply scared of active citizens marching on because the end result cannot be controlled or forecasted.
That is why in critical periods of unrest, because of financial or economical difficulties, the government and its various branches rely on rumors that insinuate that the government is in complete power of control over the behavior of their citizens.
This fear technique works most of the time to cow the public into passive status. Karl Jasper wrote in his book “The German Culpability”: “The one who remained passive knows that he is morally guilty every time he failed to respond to an action for protecting the threatened citizens, for reducing injustice, and for resisting infamy”
I think the reader is confusing predictive models of human behavior with models for evaluating the performance of behavior modifications. Institutions of power know how to modify behavior for a period, which is their main power. Institutions sublet research institutions of “scientists” in statistical design, survey, poll taking, quantitative psychologists, social scientists, political “analysts”, and so forth to present models that would corroborate the desires of the fund givers.
The “professional” scientists with many grants under their belt know how to tamper and adjust models to be biased toward the wishes of the power fund granters. Generally, the power institutions are more astute and foul the scientists more often than not, but it is a game that the scientist learn to grasp and play in due time.
I doubt that any model for predicting human behavior can outperform the odds of a coin flipping mechanism. What the models are predicting are the behavior of a restricted sample of people who were subjected with modification treatments, by subtle means unknown to them, but obviously known by the authorities.
No, the Austin TX “machine” is a scare tactics disseminated by people worked upon. This is the time to get on the move and be vocal and active.
If this terrible machine is invading individual privacy then an investigative panel with wide power should be constituted to deliver weekly reports on its findings and progress. The government policies are to present the image of omnipresence and omnipotent.
Austin TX Machine:individual privacy
Posted by: adonis49 on: April 22, 2009
Power: Modifying the order ranking of natural passions (April 22, 2009)
A reader commented on one of my posts and informed me that the US government and police force have invented a “machine” that can modify human behavior, invade individual privacy, and control our daily habits without having to bring citizens to interrogation. He went on to say that everyone in Austin TX know about this machine.
Any individual or institutional power such as executive, legislative, legal, press, media, religion, financial, and economic multinational has ultimately one purpose: modifying human behavior to coincide with a set priority of natural passions for a period of time that suit the environmental and social conditions.
Strong institutions who hold real power are not necessarily that impressed of your “free” opinions or how informed are the public. Their goal is to keep the people in a passive state and waiting for directives and guidelines through thousands of subtle means that they have total control over. What worry most the power to be are people on the move. They don’t care if this movement is within the right direction of their wishes and desires; they are simply scared of active citizens marching on because the end result cannot be controlled or forecasted.
That is why in critical periods of unrest because of financial or economical difficulties the government and its various branches rely on rumors that insinuate that the government is in complete power of control over the behavior of their citizens. This fear technique works most of the time to cow the public into passive status. Karl Jasper wrote in his book “The German Culpability”: “The one who remained passive knows that he is morally guilty every time he failed to respond to an action for protecting the threatened citizens, for reducing injustice, and for resisting infamy”
I think the reader is confusing predictive models of human behavior with models for evaluating the performance of behavior modifications. Institutions of power know how to modify behavior for a period, which is their main power. Institutions then sublet research institutions of “scientists” in statistical design, survey, poll taking, quantitative psychologists, social scientists, political “analysts”, and so forth to present models that would corroborate the desires of the fund givers. The “professional” scientists with many grants under their belt know how to tamper and adjust models to be biased toward the wishes of the power fund granters. Generally, the power institutions are more astute and foul the scientists more often than not but it is a game that the scientist learn to grasp and play in due time.
I doubt that any model for predicting human behavior can outperform the odds of a coin flipping mechanism. What the models are predicting are the behavior of a restricted sample of people who were subjected with modification treatments by subtle means unknown to them but obviously known by the power to be. No, the Austin TX “machine” is a scare tactics disseminated by worked upon people. This is the time to get on the move and be vocal and active.
If this terrible machine is invading individual privacy then an investigative panel with wide power should be constituted to deliver weekly reports on its findings and progress. The government policies are to present the image of omnipresence and omnicontrol.